Comments I'm pretty sure I read this afternoon in the GDT, too lay to go look:
"Bishop? Ugh Shutout incoming"
"Kucherov is playing? 100% chance he scores his first against us"
Really depressing how predictable it is. Clockwork.
Cause it'd be nice if you ever backed up one of your points with facts about WHY Erat sucks? I don't think this team needs him but he certainly doesn't suck.
I backed it up, he wouldnt add anything to this team. What would he add?
Lundqvist did play pretty poorly.
But this argument that giving up a soft goal "takes the wind out of the team's sales" is such a ********* argument. Wasn't Vigneault supposed to unlock the offense so we didnt have to worry about Lundqvist playing out of his mind every night? What happened with that?
Lundqvist did play pretty poorly.
But this argument that giving up a soft goal "takes the wind out of the team's sales" is such a ********* argument. Wasn't Vigneault supposed to unlock the offense so we didnt have to worry about Lundqvist playing out of his mind every night? What happened with that?
"Erat sucks because he doesn't add anything to this team".
50 points and great two way play?
SA16 has a point. Instead of looking at obtainable options that aren't bad players to begin with, lets just talk about how we can trade Del Zotto for Kane and Yakupov. Cause that'll ever happen.
"Erat sucks because he doesn't add anything to this team".
50 points and great two way play?
SA16 has a point. Instead of looking at obtainable options that aren't bad players to begin with, lets just talk about how we can trade Del Zotto for Kane and Yakupov. Cause that'll ever happen.
I agree. DZ will never be traded for Kane or Yakupov. I never said that. Try again
Lundqvist did play pretty poorly.
But this argument that giving up a soft goal "takes the wind out of the team's sales" is such a ********* argument. Wasn't Vigneault supposed to unlock the offense so we didnt have to worry about Lundqvist playing out of his mind every night? What happened with that?
Erat?
So we're officially in "anything will do" mode now?
I agree with you that we played worse against Dallas.
What happened with it is that not enough players on the team have the talent to excel in an offensive system. Those that do are easily stopped.
Lundqvist did play pretty poorly.
But this argument that giving up a soft goal "takes the wind out of the team's sales" is such a ********* argument. Wasn't Vigneault supposed to unlock the offense so we didnt have to worry about Lundqvist playing out of his mind every night? What happened with that?
"Erat sucks because he doesn't add anything to this team".
50 points and great two way play?
SA16 has a point. Instead of looking at obtainable options that aren't bad players to begin with, lets just talk about how we can trade Del Zotto for Kane and Yakupov. Cause that'll ever happen.
I know you didn't say that but it had to do with my point.
How?
If (RangerHank or w/e his name is) you don't like my suggestion how about coming up with a legitimate suggestion instead? Someone that we can get without getting rid of major pieces? Sure you can get Kane if you'd like to give up DZ, top prospects, first round picks etc...or you can get someone more on Erat's level (not necessarily him) for picks or lesser prospects. The point is he, or a player like him, is an upgrade on our 3rd line wing spot which is what we need. Replace a ~30 point player with a ~50 point player (maybe a little less if he's getting less minutes than usual and less PP time of course) and you have an improved roster. You also have additional depth in case of injury. We basically have 5 very solid wingers now in Kreider/Zucc/Callahan/Nash/Hagelin. We need one more. Richards can be one but then we are weak at C and would need to get a top 3 center to take his spot.
That everybody that can be realistically obtained sucks and the only solution to the goal problem is elite young kids that are never getting dealt.