Confirmed with Link: Rangers Acquire Rights to RW Barclay Goodrow; Signs Contract (6 Years, $3.642M AAV)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
M-NTC with a 15 team submit list. If they need to, it's easy to get out of...
Not really, because of the contract structure. If they had frontloaded the contract it would've made moving it much easier...
 
I'll say this, even though it's a big overpayment, they didn't give Barclay this money to be a 4th liner. He's going to be a first option penalty killer and consistently in the top 9, playing big minutes like he did for Tampa Bay down the stretch.

As a contender you want three scoring lines, but you can accomplish this without every top 9 forward being a finesse guy. Goodrow with two skill guys provides a bit of balance.

The big question now is how his body holds up over the duration of the contract.
 
I'll say this, even though it's a big overpayment, they didn't give Barclay this money to be a 4th liner. He's going to be a first option penalty killer and consistently in the top 9, playing big minutes like he did for Tampa Bay down the stretch.

As a contender you want three scoring lines, but you can accomplish this without every top 9 forward being a finesse guy. Goodrow with two skill guys provides a bit of balance.

The big question now is how his body holds up over the duration of the contract.
Pretty much how I feel as well. And I'm good with it. Overpaying a guy like him by $500-600k isn't going to make or break the salary cap, especially when the escrow is paid back and the cap shoots up over $90M. We were missing this exact player and paid a premium to add him. And the premium is just salary cap...no other organizational assets.

With the way they structured this deal, I'm guessing they view him taking on that role for 4 years. Puts him at 32 years old. I can't say I disagree with that. If he's still playing at the same level, you ride it out for 2 more years. If he isn't, a cap floor team looking to cheaply acquire a veteran might come knocking.
 
I’m genuinely shocked at how many people like this deal.

I'm split on this:

On one hand, I LOVE the idea of Goodrow with this team. Perfectly fits our needs up front, and I figured he was the cheapest to acquire from that Tampa 3rd line.

On the other hand, I HATE the AAV, the term, the contract structuring for the type of player he is. This is a contract doomed to come back to bite us; you don't give these contracts to bottom 6 guys from ages 28-34.

I guess the question is: does the downside of the contract itself enough completely overtake the benefits that I am excited to see with having him on the opening night roster next year? Right now, I'm really not sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LORDE and Off Sides
I'll keep an open mind of course. But 1st reaction is too long a contract.

Reminds me of other off seasons where we chased veteran role players and over paid them...only to dump their contracts asap. Brian Skrudland...Mike Keane...Aaron Ward...etc

We just saw Pittsburgh expose and lose Tanev in the expansion draft, after giving him a similar contract. Shows how much they valued that contract in relative terms.
 
Meh, we paid Smith more to do less and the Rangers seem to have to overpay for at least one position every season. As long as this is the worst of it this time round it's really not too bad.
I expect he'll get a long look on the Panarin line and end up around 14-15 mins per game
 
1) Let Fast walk because of an extra year and 500k.
2) Didn't pay up for Bennett

We were desperate to correct Gortons 'dropped balls' and it showed. I'd rather they went higher AAV but for 4 years. Anyway you try to spin it, we gave a good PKer a 6 year contract.

He helps shore up a lot of our weaknesses... even though I think we still need one more guy like him.
 
I’m genuinely shocked at how many people like this deal.

Shiny new toy syndrome. Check back in a few years if he’s not as effective and people are complaining about the bad contract that still has a ways to go.
 
People really bitch about everything, huh? I swear, if you're acting like this when we get a 3rd liner, how the f are you guys gonna react when Buch is traded or if we get Eichel?

Changes to the team were and are needed. Everyone knew these types of changes were coming. So what is the shock? Everyone chill out, and smoke some trees.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad