Miamipuck
Al Swearengen
It's quite a bit of fun poking the bees nest but the guy was respectful. He isn't blustery and or having an opinion that's outrageous. It should be ok to post it in that instance.
Post-Game Talk: Rangers 2 - Canadiens 3
- Thread starter Beacon
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
- Status
It's quite a bit of fun poking the bees nest but the guy was respectful. He isn't blustery and or having an opinion that's outrageous. It should be ok to post it in that instance.
If your a Habs fan, this is not the place for you at this time. You have 2 boards to discuss your opinion.
I would be against any Rangers fan going into the Habs boards after a loss and especialy after an incident like Price.
It's not that you said anything wrong, it's that posting in here based on your views, after a tough loss is not proper etiquette. It's common sense.
Gardner McKay
RIP, Jimmy.
Im not saying it isn't okay to post. I am just saying, even if you are respectful, don't be surprised when you are met by an angry mob.
The Rangers had some mistakes here and there and lacked finish, but they ultimately dominated the game. The reaction to the Prust blindside on Stepan probably hurt us, but there's no blaming the guys for wanting to protect their own.
I'm very pleased with the fight, with not giving up, with tying the game with an empty net which the Rangers never do. I think there's no reason to doubt their ability to win game 4.
While some people expected the Canadiens to sweep, I don't think anyone honestly considered a Rangers sweep. The Rangers don't sweep, they take it in 7.
EDIT: Would be nice to get Brassgod back in the lineup.
I'm very pleased with the fight, with not giving up, with tying the game with an empty net which the Rangers never do. I think there's no reason to doubt their ability to win game 4.
While some people expected the Canadiens to sweep, I don't think anyone honestly considered a Rangers sweep. The Rangers don't sweep, they take it in 7.
EDIT: Would be nice to get Brassgod back in the lineup.
I'm not a "Habs fan" - I'm a hockey fan. I'm stating my opinion on the hit and the possible suspension, using facts and images. I think it's fine to state the reality of a situation, no? It was a late hit, but not to the head. I'm assuming it will be one game. It should have been a 2-minute interference call, but certainly Mr. Bettman isn't pulling strings or anything to change any outcomes.
Suspension..if not one Cleary they do have it out for the rangers.. if that was.brown or toress (sp?) They would be going crazy and talk about getting suspended for the series
Jarkko Immonen
#42 Artem Anisimov
Conveniently throwing that info out before the 4 p.m. hearing...
Can he play with a broken jaw?
Can he play with a broken jaw?
Then why not discuss it on the main board, instead of here? There is a thread dedicated to it. That is why that board is created.
It is common sense to know how inappropriate it is to come onto another teams board and argue against their fans, again, regardless of facts, after a tough loss like that.
The Kreider play was clearly not his fault, but you don't see me going into the Habs board to prove it with facts and frames and what not.
That's because it's disrespectful and I have respect for the emotions this game brings with it.
Again, there is a DESIGNATED spot for discussions for fans like you. Why you need to preach your opinion elsewhere is beyond me.
Jarkko Immonen
#42 Artem Anisimov
Darren Dreger @DarrenDreger 8s
Doctors cleared him to play last night. Says diagnosis on Stepan made this am. He requires surgery. No timeline for return.
Doctors cleared him to play last night. Says diagnosis on Stepan made this am. He requires surgery. No timeline for return.
I don't care about your attempt to justify your opinion as "more impartial and thus more rational". Doesn't mean you're right.
I also don't care that the principle point of contact was the "chest". That really means nothing to me. For your information, hits to the chest that lead to the head snapping back violently can sometimes lead to concussions, too.
I'm looking at a 4th line player, who plays minimal minutes and doesn't affect the score of a game directly too often, locking his sight on a player without a puck who is not looking at him (nor within an appropriate time frame to expect physical contact - in effect not thinking that he needs to protect himself from physical harm) and then blindsiding him to the upper chest, neck and chin. There are rules in the league that protect players who are unaware and not involved in a play from being a part of the play.
Unfortunately, this safety department operates likes this: injury = suspension, non-injury = no suspension. They don't take into account the intent unless there is an injury.
Nevertheless, I find it laughable that you claim you are a "hockey fan" when you not only condone such on-ice antics, but trivialize their actual significance. 2 minute interference? Get out of here with that ****. You're incising the board for no discernible reason.
haohmaru
boomshakalaka
But...it wasn't a headshot...right? Can't believe what some of these "experts"'(Roenick, etc...)!have said about that hit
It's fine. Brassard will be back (hopefully) next game. Miller will be center on the first line. Guys need to step up. Miller will be a star. Time to put on his big boy pants. Guy can play. We will have to deal with his defensive liability.
haohmaru
boomshakalaka
Players need to step up - namely, Miller.
Step is a big loss, but I'm telling you - Miller will be a star. He's gonna have to really step up now.
Yup, because people break their jaw when getting hit in the chest all the time.
You are so painfully wrong, its not even funny. Time to crawl back in your hole and go away.
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=720368&navid=nhl:topheads
phone hearing for Prust. Suspension incoming. It has been reviewed, if no suspension was coming there would not be a phone hearing. What is the limit on suspensions with phone hearings?
Clearly Prust's goal of injuring top player for retribution was achieved. I did not take me long to hate Montreal.
"Finish" your checks boys.
phone hearing for Prust. Suspension incoming. It has been reviewed, if no suspension was coming there would not be a phone hearing. What is the limit on suspensions with phone hearings?
Clearly Prust's goal of injuring top player for retribution was achieved. I did not take me long to hate Montreal.
"Finish" your checks boys.
Player's go down with injury, others have to come in. Miller's ceiling - in terms of potential and playing ability - is much higher than anyone else's who isn't playing.
Put Moore back on the 4th line, we clearly have a hole on that line now that Carcillo can't play.
Brassard & Richards on the other two lines. Miller with Kreider and Nash.
That needs to be the line.
Doubtful. We don't have a Thornton and Lucic to make them pay. Dorsett can't slip and slide his way into payback. Just not in the cards, in that sense.
- Status
Latest posts
-
-
Speculation: Roster Building thread - Part XVII - (TDL is March 7th)- Latest: jerseyjinx94
