Post-Game Talk: Rangers 2 - Canadiens 3

[Infinitum Vitae*]

Going back to the subject of the post game talk... I didn't notice stralman in the third period all to much

 

[kovazub94]

Lines in practice:


Carl Hagelin, Brad Richards, Marty St. Louis
Jesper Fast, Dominic Moore, Rick Nash
Benoit Pouliot, Derick Brassard, Mats Zuccarello
JT Miller, Brian Boyle, Derek Dorsett

Kreider with a maintenance day. Swap him in for Fast and it looks about right.

D. Moore should have it "easier" to stand in for north-south Stepan than east-west Brassard. I wouldn't trust Miller 1C duty in a this type of the game. Not yet.

 

[Amazing Kreiderman]

I agree. It's like loving your country but hating your government.

As a South African, I know what you're talking about

 

[KOVALEV022473]

Yes. I feel so ashamed.

Being schooled by some great minds here.

Perhaps this is the thread you are referencing:

http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?p=85497159

Solid stuff.

Whats your deal man? TheBigWhistle and I pointed out the throwing of NBA games by an official, to make the point there are biases/agendas in sports that can dictate the outcome of the game! It doesn't matter if it was only one WAS CAUGHT, it only takes one jurors comments or actions for a mistrial! You're always the first person in here shooting people down for voicing their opinions on a message board and questioning their motives for watching the games.You are not the arbiter of objective reasoning in here my friend.

 

[jerseyjinx94]

You made something up and got called on it.

I understand why you now have to change the subject, yet again.

Defend whatever you want. I only pointed out the idiocy of saying the league has it in for the Rangers. You are entitled to disagree.

Although I may not agree with the way you approached your point, I agree, it is absolutely delusional thinking to suggest the league has a fix in against the Rangers. It's beyond absurd, in my eyes.

Also your penalty shot analysis is slightly off. From the league website:

"(iii) The player in possession and control (or, in the judgment of the Referee, clearly would have obtained possession and control of the puck) must have been denied a reasonable chance to score (the fact that he got a shot off does not automatically eliminate this play from the penalty shot consideration criteria. If the foul was from behind and he was denied a “more†reasonable scoring opportunity due to the foul, then the penalty shot should be awarded);"

Come to think of it, I don't know why a shot wasn't awarded then. I always assumed if you got a shot off, there was no shot awarded. I guess it just makes it less likely

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

Whats your deal man? TheBigWhistle and I pointed out the throwing of NBA games by an official, to make the point there are biases/agendas in sports that can dictate the outcome of the game! It doesn't matter if it was only one WAS CAUGHT, it only takes one jurors comments or actions for a mistrial! You're always the first person in here shooting people down for voicing their opinions on a message board and questioning their motives for watching the games.You are not the arbiter of objective reasoning in here my friend.

Hey I'm Right there with ya my friend!!..I also love your avatar

 

[KOVALEV022473]

Hey I'm Right there with ya my friend!!..I also love your avatar

Thanks! I got it from a picture NYRfan68 posted in the Krieder thread. Its hilarious!

 

[Jabroni]

Let's bring this to the pre game thread.