Post-Game Talk: Rangers 2 - Canadiens 3

[THE BIG WHISTLE]

Yes.

I do know if we lost Hank in a similar fashion, people here would be bellowing just as loudly as Montreal fans are. They are no better or worse.

Why wasn't there a penalty shot or a penalty called???
If my defenseman trips or slashes a player on a breakaway on my goalie and he collides with him, then all bets are off, it's part of the game. So don't put me in a category of the minority.

 

[jerseyjinx94]

Was Kreider slashed/tripped on that breakaway in Game 1 ?

Yeah he was tripped. It goes both ways. There's no fix against the Rangers. That's delusional thinking.

 

[chosen]

Why wasn't there a penalty shot or a penalty called???
If my defenseman trips or slashes a player on a breakaway on my goalie and he collides with him, then all bets are off, it's part of the game. So don't put me in a category of the minority.

This is the first post where I have seen a fan say that should have been a penalty shot.

 

[THE BIG WHISTLE]

Yeah he was tripped. It goes both ways. There's no fix against the Rangers. That's delusional thinking.

Who said there was a fix, when did a Canadien get tripped on a breakaway and it was not called??? Did I miss the two late interference hits the Rangers did with one resulting in a shoulder injury and the other a broken jaw ?? I have to start watching these games a little closer

 

[THE BIG WHISTLE]

This is the first post where I have seen a fan say that should have been a penalty shot.

You don't think a penalty shot was warranted in that situation? If not please tell me your criteria of a penalty shot

 

[chosen]

You don't think a penalty shot was warranted in that situation? If not please tell me your criteria of a penalty shot

I will certainly do so right after you answer my last question about the NBA.

 

[Holocene]

This is the first post where I have seen a fan say that should have been a penalty shot.

Really? It's been discussed all over the boards.

 

[chosen]

Really? It's been discussed all over the boards.

Then I missed it, and I thought I had read close to all of it.

Anyway, the defender did not come from directly behind and Kreider got off a shot, so I don't see under what criteria it qualifies.

 

[THE BIG WHISTLE]

I will certainly do so right after you answer my last question about the NBA.

I don't have time like you do to go back and research that incident. I am going on what I read and heard from a reliable source. If you don't believe me ,I really don't give a rats ass.

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

Really? It's been discussed all over the boards.

Yea seriously all the fans I talked to thought it was a penalty shot

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

Then I missed it, and I thought I had read close to all of it.

Anyway, the defender did not come from directly behind and Kreider got off a shot, so I don't see under what criteria it qualifies.

Lol just give up already...your getting schooled and everyone sees it

 

[THE BIG WHISTLE]

Then I missed it, and I thought I had read close to all of it.

Anyway, the defender did not come from directly behind and Kreider got off a shot, so I don't see under what criteria it qualifies.

There have been penalty shots awarded this season when the player got the shot off. The number one criteria for a penalty shot is if the player is impeded in anyway, I believe the slash/trip easily fits under that

 

[chosen]

I don't have time like you do to go back and research that incident. I am going on what I read and heard from a reliable source. If you don't believe me ,I really don't give a rats ass.

I had the time to look it up. It took all of 10 seconds. Guess you are too busy, as evidenced by your having time to write more things here.

Pretty weak.

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

There have been penalty shots awarded this season when the player got the shot off. The number one criteria for a penalty shot is if the player is impeded in anyway, I believe the slash/trip easily fits under that

I remember when McD lifted a islanders stick and they called it a penalty shot.. complete BS

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

I had the time to look it up. It took all of 10 seconds. Guess you are too busy, as evidenced by your having time to write more things here.

Pretty weak.

Pretty weak is you trying to win a argument that you lost a long time ago

 

[chosen]

Lol just give up already...your getting schooled and everyone sees it

Yes. I feel so ashamed.

Being schooled by some great minds here.

Perhaps this is the thread you are referencing:

http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?p=85497159

Solid stuff.

 

[THE BIG WHISTLE]

I had the time to look it up. It took all of 10 seconds. Guess you are too busy, as evidenced by your having time to write more things here.

Pretty weak.

That's because you are always looking for away to prove someone wrong. You must be the life of the party. I just came to support one of me fellow Ranger brothers, who let his emotions out on how he felt about the officials but yet had to hear a so called fellow fan just chastise him with their condescending attitude

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

Yes. I feel so ashamed.

Being schooled by some great minds here.

Yup including yours

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

That's because you are always looking for away to prove someone wrong. You must be the life of the party. I just came to support one of me fellow Ranger brothers, who let his emotions out on how he felt about the officials but yet had to hear a so called fellow fan just chastise him with their condescending attitude

Agree with this...rangers fans need to stick together

 

[chosen]

That's because you are always looking for away to prove someone wrong. You must be the life of the party. I just came to support one of me fellow Ranger brothers, who let his emotions out on how he felt about the officials but yet had to hear a so called fellow fan just chastise him with their condescending attitude

You made something up and got called on it.

I understand why you now have to change the subject, yet again.

Defend whatever you want. I only pointed out the idiocy of saying the league has it in for the Rangers. You are entitled to disagree.

 

[chosen]

Yup including yours

This response didn't even make sense.

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

You made something up and got called on it.

I understand why you now have to change the subject, yet again

Defend whatever you want. I only pointed out the idiocy of saying the league has it in for the Rangers. You are entitled to disagree.

Well we can definitely see you don't sit in the blue seats... psht.. I don't think I can even call you a fan of the blueshirts... because Ranger fans stick together unlike you

 

[5 4 Fighting]

This response didn't even make sense.

Lol exactly. Some people aren't the sharpest tools in the shed, it's all good

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

This response didn't even make sense.

That's because you don't have a "Great mind" like the posters on this board

 

[Infinitum Vitae*]

Lol exactly. Some people aren't the sharpest tools in the shed, it's all good

Insulting my intelligence.. Pretty sure that's a infraction