dogthateats
Registered User
- May 26, 2011
- 13,045
- 16,506
I think the main question is probably just comfort with making reads and getting used to an entirely different position. 1B always seems like the more natural option for a catcher (thinking of Grandal), but there's not necessarily a reason it can't be tried.
I am a little bit apprehensive just because Davis has been a catcher full-time, and clearly has the tenacity and team leader type mentality that makes him suitable for it. The angle of transitioning him fully would be pretty extreme, and it's hard to know for sure what doing it part-time would look like with his development.
That stuff is hard enough to watch on MLB broadcasts, let alone the MiLB feeds, but I think the main questions with him are general framing and defense along with pitch calling and game management, which he didn't do in college. He's clearly got the work ethic to improve, so my mindset is that he needs to get back from injury and keep at it full time this year in AA. You probably don't start thinking about alternatives until the winter, and in any case, it seems exceedingly likely that he will not debut in MLB until after Super Two next year at the earliest.
It was a good follow-up performance. Noted: after allowing the leadoff double, he struck out the next two batters before finishing it off with a weak ground ball.Solometo had a strong 2nd start down in Florida this evening.
It's nice to see Solometo getting into affiliate ball so quickly and finding success early on.
Besides Bae, someone who is coming on strong in Indianapolis right now is Swaggerty, who seems to finally have things clicking at the plate. This is important because as nice as it's been to see good signs out of various OFs, Swaggerty still has some of the strongest carrying tools, not to mention his draft profile. He's had a very bumpy road between the injuries and the Covid year, but the package of tools is really more important to look at than the cumulative results.
More pointedly, if he will hit MLB pitching, then he's a starting OF because of the speed and defense, and maybe a nice complement to Hayes at the very top of the lineup. I like Hayes in the leadoff spot, but it might be a nice shot in the arm to Swaggerty's MLB debut if he has Hayes hitting behind him in the lineup. I think he's still rightly flying under the radar in terms of prospects since he started slow, but if his game is on the upswing, then that could be a pretty exciting development for the latter half of the MLB season and beyond.
It does perhaps throw a slight wrench into the Cruz to OF discussions. It's also unfortunate that Gamel got injured, since he was putting up a very solid year and should be a decent piece to dangle at the deadline. We just have to see how everything unfolds, but I think the best outcome might be to get Gamel and Newman back, then have both Swaggerty and Cruz up in MLB and into fairly regular playing time. See what kind of minor pieces you can get for Newman and Gamel and then let the kids play.
Newman should not be that difficult to deal if he's healthy, since a good defender / contact guy has a role on even pretty good teams as the final guy on the bench. I think between Castillo's defense, Castro's competence, and Cruz's impending debut, there's no need to worry about hanging onto Newman anymore as the default option.
Yes, I think I would let Swaggerty continue to cook throughout the month and see how it goes. I don't really think we need to lose much sleep over Gamel -- he either comes back and can slot right in and returns something ok in a trade or he doesn't. Swaggerty's had such a bumpy path that I think 6 strong weeks or so is what you want to see, which might time it more around the all star break or even after.
I also agree that Mitchell should at least be given some run, as clearly he played well enough to be added to the 40-man roster. Right now, with Marcano really playing well, it's a balancing act to get both him and Suwinski into the mix regularly, so I think it's the right thought in general to pump the brakes and let things continue to shake out before really acting. I do think Swaggerty is a more important long-term guy because of the overall tool package, but let's see if he keeps this play up for another month or more.
With Bolton, I'm of the mindset that AAA reps are not hugely important except in rare cases. For pitchers especially, what makes them viable in MLB is if they have the quality of pitches and know how to use them. I think the pandemic year really showed that. The pertinent question for me is mainly opportunity and roster jockeying if the guy isn't on the 40-man. I'm surprised to look it up now and see that Bolton isn't, which is I guess one more benefit to us of not having the Rule 5 draft this year.
There are clearly some guys who can be DFA'd (Fletcher, Park, eventually Chang and Yoshi), but I think it's also fine to wait until it's needed at the MLB level. Keller will get more run to see if he can dial the sinker in and show something, and at some point you also just have to think about innings. Bolton has injury history, and it's a decent bet that one of the MLB pitchers will get injured at some point. There's no reason to rush with him, though I will say that I watched his start last night and was impressed. Hopefully he can string together some more and stay healthy.
Craziness to see the Pirates sweep the Dodgers. Dont think anyone saw that coming.
Yinz guys got it figured.Yes, I think I would let Swaggerty continue to cook throughout the month and see how it goes. I don't really think we need to lose much sleep over Gamel -- he either comes back and can slot right in and returns something ok in a trade or he doesn't. Swaggerty's had such a bumpy path that I think 6 strong weeks or so is what you want to see, which might time it more around the all star break or even after.
I also agree that Mitchell should at least be given some run, as clearly he played well enough to be added to the 40-man roster. Right now, with Marcano really playing well, it's a balancing act to get both him and Suwinski into the mix regularly, so I think it's the right thought in general to pump the brakes and let things continue to shake out before really acting. I do think Swaggerty is a more important long-term guy because of the overall tool package, but let's see if he keeps this play up for another month or more.
With Bolton, I'm of the mindset that AAA reps are not hugely important except in rare cases. For pitchers especially, what makes them viable in MLB is if they have the quality of pitches and know how to use them. I think the pandemic year really showed that. The pertinent question for me is mainly opportunity and roster jockeying if the guy isn't on the 40-man. I'm surprised to look it up now and see that Bolton isn't, which is I guess one more benefit to us of not having the Rule 5 draft this year.
There are clearly some guys who can be DFA'd (Fletcher, Park, eventually Chang and Yoshi), but I think it's also fine to wait until it's needed at the MLB level. Keller will get more run to see if he can dial the sinker in and show something, and at some point you also just have to think about innings. Bolton has injury history, and it's a decent bet that one of the MLB pitchers will get injured at some point. There's no reason to rush with him, though I will say that I watched his start last night and was impressed. Hopefully he can string together some more and stay healthy.
I agree that we need to pump the brakes on any kind of 2022 will be meaningful in terms of wins. Even just this weekend's series might be easier said than done -- the DBacks have played pretty well this year and won't be a pushover. And then soon after, we have 8 road games vs. the Braves and Cardinals. If we navigate that with something like 5-3, that will be exciting, but doesn't change the prognosis anyways.
With that said, I think the principle still stands that to make this team better going forward, external-to-the-organization talent will have to be added. I do not think it's even a remote possibility, but that could mean something like getting in the mix for Frankie Montas and signing him to an extension. It could also mean ponying up relatively serious $ for Musgrove this winter.
This is a cold way to look at it, but prospects are primarily currency for MLB teams. The remainder of the year should primarily be about playing the various young players for experience and continuing to assess them, but if we need to tap into the depth in order to make the MLB team better for the next few years, then IMO that's the entire point, so I don't have a problem with it in principle, though there is an obvious list of guys who should be basically untouchable.