OT: Raise the Jolly Roger: Congrats to the Houston Cheaters on their win

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sure they would want to dump it in theory, but Soto is also so valuable that they could quite rightly demand the top 3 or 4 prospects in a good system for him and a team should probably give them up.

The Nats are really in a bad situation and sort of have been since they moved Turner and Scherzer last year. We shouldn't forget that they did manage to win it all, but I don't exactly see a linear path to rebuilding. They should probably just focus on making Soto a National for life, but they still have some real constraints that will make it difficult for them to contend.

I think a Soto trade wouldn't necessarily correlate with typical surplus value calculation just because there's basically no precedent for trading him. If you were an acquiring team in a big market who had the ability to just make him your franchise player for life, you just do it and figure out how to restock your system later IMO.

This is a good point. At $450M and 1WAR being at ~$8M right now, he would need to produce 56 WAR over the lifespan of the contract. Which will likely run until he's 36-37.

IMO the best recent comps are Harper, Miggy and Pujols. Machado, Betts and Trout are also great players they get defensive value which Soto won't.
Harper from age 24-29 (6 years): 21.5WAR - probably going to end at about 23. I don't think he will reach that 56WAR.
Cabrera from 24-36: 54.1WAR
Pujols from 24-36: 80.6WAR

Just for Ss and Gs I'll also plug in Manny Ramirez. Of course not natural, but a similar profile of a prodigious corner OF: 63WAR

So based on Cabrera, Pujols and Manny - IMO his 3 most recent comps - he should exceed the contract value by 5-15WAR. Then of course you have the kinda discount value where the surplus value vs. contract is likely to be higher for the first few years...could see that at 20-25WAR of surplus value which equates to 150WAR of prospect value.
 
I think it's important to note on Barco, he was gaining a lot of steam at the end of the 2021 college season and early this year. Assuming he's healthy next summer, I'm starting to get more and more intrigued w/this lefty.






10. Nationals — Hunter Barco, LHP, Florida

Barco has been a full-time starter essentially from day one with the Gators—no small feat considering some of the other pitchers on the staff he’s had to compete with. Over two seasons (including the shortened 2020 season) the 6-foot-4 southpaw has posted a 3.52 ERA in 102.1 innings, with 120 strikeouts and 32 walks. He has a four-pitch mix with a fastball that gets into the mid-90s, a low 80s swing-and-miss slider and a curve and changeup that are thrown less frequently. Barco ranked as the No. 32 prospect in the 2019 draft class out of high school.

Also had this to say about Johnson who went 5th

5. Royals — Termarr Johnson, SS, Mays HS, Atlanta

Johnson has some of the best barrel control and pure hitting traits in the 2022 class and seems totally in control of every at-bat with top-of-the-order upside. He’s performed at a high level with Team USA and has played shortstop, second base and centerfield, with almost unconsciously smooth actions and sure hands defensively. He’s listed at 5-foot-10, 175 pounds and doesn’t have the most projectable frame, but does everything on the field at a very high level already. Johnson is uncommitted.
 
Good find on Barco -- I'm trying to keep an open mind until we see him pitch for a while in the minors and what kind of plan we have for him. The thing that has me feeling so-so about it is that most people don't seem to like his fastball, but I did see some speculation that we might change his pitch mix.

For a way too early look at next year, it seems like there is a pretty solid college group towards the top of the class. The chatter I've seen is that the overall group isn't that deep, but there are some pretty good names towards the top. Besides Jacob Gonzalez and Dylan Crews, one name who is around the 5-10 range is Enrique Bradfield Jr., who watchers of Rocker/Leiter last year will no doubt remember for his insane speed at Vandy.

The new wrinkle will be the lotto, which will assign the order of the top-6 picks as well as who gets into them (i.e., while it's extremely unlikely, the worst team could pick 7th).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImporterExporter
2023 Mock out from BA:

Has us picking 7th and getting a guy I would be thrilled with.


7. Pirates — Enrique Bradfield, OF, Vanderbilt

Bradfield is among the most exciting players in the country. A top-of-the-scale runner who covers a massive amount of ground in center field with ease, Bradfield is a terror for opposing batteries and he can easily turn a single or a walk into a double with his wheels on the bases. In 2022 he stole 46 bags and wasn’t caught a single time, and he also went from a single home run as a freshman to eight as a sophomore. While power will never be a featured part of his game, adding strength to a still-lean frame could make him all the more dangerous on both sides of the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: td_ice
2023 Mock out from BA:

Has us picking 7th and getting a guy I would be thrilled with.

Definitely an intriguing player and could be the type who won't go quite as high as the top-5 because power will be all projection. He's a plus fielder at a premium position and the speed is off the charts elite, so he'd be a fun old school table setter. I don't really know enough about his game to know how quickly the hit tool could move through the minors, but I like the sound of him.

The top of the draft looks pretty solid right now, as much or even more as this year. It's always too early at this point, but college and some prep bats are usually a good early indication and tend to stick around. The lists so far all seem unanimously high on Jacob Gonzalez, Dylan Crews, and Brock Wilkens, and then prep OFs Max Clark and Walker Jenkins look like good bets for high picks. Who knows what will happen with the pitching, but some lists mention a lot of guys.

I don't quite grasp the ins and outs of the lotto system yet, but I assume that the odds listed are both for the #1 pick and then also for getting any pick inside of the actual top 6 lotto picks? Or perhaps the odds are recalculated? Either way, as much as I hate entertaining these thoughts, the odds become meaningfully better once you get into the bottom 5. 1, 2, and 3 worst all have 16.5% chance and 5 has a 10% chance.

Oakland and Washington are probably in a class of their own and will sell/continue to get beat up by playoff teams. Then there are probably 6 or 7 teams who could shake out in nearly any order. It'd be nice to somehow claw up to 3rd and maybe get a shot at Crews, but there are so many ifs before we entertain that kind of hypothetical that it's better to assume we'll have a top 7-8 pick and that there's a pretty decent group of bats.
 
I would definitely be out on trading Vogelbach because of the strong indications that it would give that 2023 is another punt year (as if we aren't practically already there...). He's under team control for nothing next year and while there is probably a world where some younger bats surpass him, I doubt we'll have several candidates who need to play over him, and even in that case, he can come off the bench at 1.5M.

One change of scenery candidate who I would definitely be interested in though is Dom Smith. Has regressed somewhat, but plays a very good defensive 1B and has had inconsistent playing time this year. I'm not exactly sure what the Mets would be looking for in a deal, but he could be a good calculated risk to acquire and see if he can turn it around -- 2 years of control, slides right into a platoon with Chavis.
 
Vogelbach could really, really benefit from banning the shift next year. Worth considering. And I know I gave him a lot of shit earlier.
 
Except Delay is producing right now. Pretty much since they called him up. What was Jake Stallings doing at 27 again?

Now that we are on the other side of the draft and the ASB, I'd like to revisit this series of posts and what the Pirates should be doing in the second half of the season.

Initially, with regard to Delay, it's absolutely ridiculous to suggest he should be the catcher the rest of this year and next year. His collective minor league OPS in 2021 and 2022 is .532, and 31 not terrible MLB AB's doesn't erase 6 years of ineptitude. Hell, it would be one thing if he was great defensively, but he's throwing out 22% of base stealers and has 2 errors in 12 games. And yeah what was Stallings doing at 27? Oh, he was posting a .789 OPS at AAA with excellent defense. So what was the point of that comparison again?

The bigger issue is that the next 2.5 months have to start being auditions to sort out the prospects and any AB given to Newman or Marisnick or Yoshi or VanMeter is a waste of time. Nothing any of those guys is going to do over the next 12 days is going to make a team decide to throw a real prospect at the Pirates to acquire at the deadline, and the only thing this organization should care about doing for the rest of the season is getting a good look at guys like Marcano and Swaggerty and Suwinski and Bae and Mitchell to see what we have what we don't. At some point they have to make decisions as to who is part of the future and who isn't, and that's a lot more easily accomplished giving the kids a chance than it is watching Josh VanMeter 5x a week.
 
I don't expect much out of Delay but I like the little I've seen from him so far and I'm fine with him continuing to get ABs. He and Heineman are basically org guys and have the same amount of control left. No real expectations, as we basically need to re-sign Perez next year and hope for the best, but might as well run an audition for someone to have the inside track as the backup catcher.

Otherwise, I think patience should already be extraordinarily thin in terms of playing time and not turning the page on guys, and it should only get more extremely if the deadline comes and goes in a week and a half and about 3-4 roster spots at minimum don't turn over.

With that said, maybe my biggest delusion is that BC needs to get creative in terms of taking some risks on guys who are on the outs elsewhere but might thrive with opportunity and still have some years of control left. I already mentioned Dom Smith, and another who could be worth chasing is Andujar. I'm a little more intrigued by Smith because he already fits at a position where we basically have nothing, but Andujar is a big bat from the right side and could fit in the OF mix.

The obvious problem is that I'm not really sure we have the best pieces to make a play for these kinds of guys. Stratton might be appealing as a veteran bullpen guy who slots into a kind of MRP on a better team, but beyond that I'm not sure. In any case, I think this is all highly unlikely, but the barest minimum is that we need to get a look at 3-4 of the group of prospects in AAA.
 
Now that we are on the other side of the draft and the ASB, I'd like to revisit this series of posts and what the Pirates should be doing in the second half of the season.

Initially, with regard to Delay, it's absolutely ridiculous to suggest he should be the catcher the rest of this year and next year. His collective minor league OPS in 2021 and 2022 is .532, and 31 not terrible MLB AB's doesn't erase 6 years of ineptitude. Hell, it would be one thing if he was great defensively, but he's throwing out 22% of base stealers and has 2 errors in 12 games. And yeah what was Stallings doing at 27? Oh, he was posting a .789 OPS at AAA with excellent defense. So what was the point of that comparison again?

The bigger issue is that the next 2.5 months have to start being auditions to sort out the prospects and any AB given to Newman or Marisnick or Yoshi or VanMeter is a waste of time. Nothing any of those guys is going to do over the next 12 days is going to make a team decide to throw a real prospect at the Pirates to acquire at the deadline, and the only thing this organization should care about doing for the rest of the season is getting a good look at guys like Marcano and Swaggerty and Suwinski and Bae and Mitchell to see what we have what we don't. At some point they have to make decisions as to who is part of the future and who isn't, and that's a lot more easily accomplished giving the kids a chance than it is watching Josh VanMeter 5x a week.


Who else is going to C over Daley that has shown any legitimate ability? Perez? Career game was great, but he's a horrendous bat, solid defensively. Next. Heineman? Can't hit, solid defensively. Next.

There is nobody else. Maybe you give Carter Bins a look later in the year, I'd be fine w/that. But so far, Daley has hit the ball, very well, and not sucked defensively. Nobody is saying he's the locked in guy into next year (yet) based on 30+ AB's but he's the only guy I've watched this year that looks like he knows what he's doing at the dish. And neither Perez or Heineman are so much better defensively that it makes up for their non existent offense, which if you haven't been paying attention, sucks. So I want a C that can hit. Let Daley continue to hit until he doesn't.

But again, there is nobody else to be the main guy the last 2.5 months. Best player wins. It's a crap shoot until Perez is healthy/back (no guarantee) or Davis shows up, which given his injury woes almost certainly won't be until 2024 now.

Let Newman play until the trade deadline. One, he's performing, which serves 2 purposes. It helps the team, A, and B, it at least gets teams looking and plenty can use a MI, who plays great D, runs well, and this year, is hitting the ball well. One way or another, he's gone or benched in favor of Marcano/Bae in August/September. And if he does stay, and is playing every day over those guys, then f*** Shelton and to a lesser extent, Cherington, as he could push the buttons if needed.

This is why I support trading Quintana and revisiting him in the winter during FA. His value is going to be solid. Obviously less than Musgrove but his price tag and lefty status helps the cause. We're not going to win anything. We all know that. But you took a gamble on a guy for dirt cheap and are now in position to get at least 2-3 dart throws, for a few months of work.

I don't understand why some people don't see/consider this approach. Short of having a much larger payroll there is no way to do it otherwise.

These half baked notions of signing guys to long term extensions are 99% fantasy, Until Nutting proves he's going to A, spend on his own guys (more than one) and two, outside players, we have to operate as if we're pinching pennies and must squeeze every bit of value and potential as possible out of players who can't help us win this year.

Plus, in this case, if Quintana had a good experience, and I'd wager it's been pretty good given the turnaround (plus PNC isn't a bad park to pitch in) he's certainly in play this winter. So, IF, Nutting starts to do what he did about 10-11 years ago, and opens the purse strings a bit, then you can say, Jose, what about 3/45? We want you to be an inning eater veteran on the front end of a winning window. That is, if we're given permission to spend money.

Worst case, he signs for more money elsewhere but we still got value beyond his being here, and the system absolutely needs more P prospects, even post draft.

Obviously the shocker would be spending on someone like Musgrove, but that's a locked in pipe dream IMHO.

Regardless, the players that you should absolutely move given their value being about as high as it would get moving forward:

1. Quintana - Maybe you get someone just inside a team's top 10, but I'd wager it'll be something more like a 12-15 ranked guy and then a pair of 20-30ish types. Given how much the system has been built up the last 2 years, I'd personally rather take 1 top 10 player straight up and gamble on the upside, especially if the prospect is having a strong year vs the much lower ranked dart throws, which do eat up system space.

2. Newman - Given the glut of MI/OF prospects we have, the space is needed. Newman, even if he settles down into a mid 600 OPS guy the rest of the year, still gives contenders a very reliable bench option, who can run, and defend really well. Return won't be much. 2 dart throws outside the top 20.

3. VanMeeter/Marisnick/Yoshi/Gamel - Get whatever you can for them. Even if it's just international bonus money. Otherwise DFA them. Gamel should get you something at least. I'd be shocked if Yoshi brought anything. We need to get Sunwinski back up down the line. You have Mitchell, Bae, Marcano, Castillo. Reynolds could be coming back, we'll see. The OF should be youngster from August onward.

Guys you definitely listen on:

1. Vogel - Dude is mashing righties and given every team has a DH, some contender will need a fat guy who can mash right handed P. Cheap, can be brought back again cheap next year. I would like to see him stay as one of the few vets for reasons DJ mentioned. However, if you get a stronger than expected offer, it's understandable to move him.

2. Bednar - Doubt he's moved, but again if the offer is really good, you have to consider it. I don't want to see him moved. I think he was overworked and really struggling to maintain his form the last few weeks/moth. Give the guy an easy pace out of the break. Let DL Santos get some looks, he's not been used terribly much yet.

I don't move Reynolds and I'll be shocked if he is, especially now that he's hurt and Soto in the mix.

Get what you can for the upper portion of the list and then let the young guns get reps every day moving forward.

I'm not a big fan of bringing in guys from outside the org. who have been struggling heavily and will only get in the way of our existing prospects. Dom Smith makes some sense since we really don't have any 1B prospects, but a guy like Andujar? No thanks. Hasn't done anything since 2018 and that's a loooong time in between good-bad. He'd just get in the way of guys we already have who need looks, and present as much, if not more upside anway, IMO.
 
I would definitely trade Vogelbach because I think you can effectively replace him with Madris. Vogelbach is nice to have against righties, but he's way too flawed of a player for me to bother keeping. If a contender wants him as a platoon DH option and would give up something for him, I would absolutely take them up on that.

Quintana, Gamel, Newman and Vogelbach are no-brainers to trade at the deadline IMO. Even if you keep guys like Marisnick, Vanmeter and such, just moving out those few veterans with value will give you the roster spots needed to call up guys like Marcano, Suwinski and such. My goal would be to have this lineup after the trade deadline:

C: Perez/Heineman
1B: Chavis
2B: Marcano
3B: Hayes
SS: Cruz
LF: Marisnick
CF: Reynolds
RF: Suwinski
DH: Tsutsugo (just for the rest of the year and then let him go after the year)
Extras: Castillo, Heineman/Perez, VanMeter, Madris

I don't care if they keep guys like Tsutsugo and VanMeter as well, but I'm not sure they have quite enough guys in AAA to fill out the roster if you trade all of the veterans on the roster.
 
I think with the scarcity of pitching and the number of buyers, we're probably trading Quintana. I've been skeptical all year that we'll get much of anything for him, and I am still pretty skeptical, but I think we'll get something more for him than what we got for Anderson.

As much as I'd like to think that we could trade and re-sign Quintana, it's something that rarely ever happens. It's impossible to know what Quintana wants to do, as he's never won a World Series and will definitely get some kind of offer this winter from a better team than us. I think if he's not interested in returning, you just trade him and tank worse/figure out something for his innings, but if he is interested in a return, then the best way is probably to keep him around, unless he really wants to try for a ring this year.

Otherwise, it's a lot of bleh. I assume Gamel and Marisnik will be bench upgrades for someone, and perhaps Newman, but there's not much of value coming back for any of that. The frustrating reality is that we're pretty light on good and interesting players, so any kind of bigger deadline splash probably doesn't bode well. In other words, for example, we could probably try and move Wil Crowe for something, but the the bullpen is set back even further next year.

We've seen a 40-man roster merry go round for basically Cherington's entire tenure, and I think there's a pretty close relationship between Shelton's playing time decisions and Cherington's roster decisions. Whatever else happens, there need to be some serious questions if we don't start maximizing playing time for young players starting in August.
 
We've seen a 40-man roster merry go round for basically Cherington's entire tenure, and I think there's a pretty close relationship between Shelton's playing time decisions and Cherington's roster decisions. Whatever else happens, there need to be some serious questions if we don't start maximizing playing time for young players starting in August.
I don't think Cherington thinks the upper minors hitting crew is very good. Which is a shame, because he assembled like half of them. But it will help keep expectations low - where he likes them.
 
I get that Kevin Newman has hit fairly well in 2022, as much as a .694 OPS is. That doesn't change the facts that he turns 29 this month, was sub-600 OPS the past two full seasons, he's not going to be back in 2023, this organization has middle infielder prospects coming out its ass, and whether they win 1 or 2 more games the rest of the way than they would otherwise is completely inconsequential, even if you assume that playing Newman over Marcano or Peguero would accomplish that. If you want to play him until August 2, fine, whatever - still a waste of two weeks of development and evaluation, but it's two weeks. After that there's NO reason to keep playing Kevin Newman regularly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gallatin
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad