Q sending message to Stalberg/Saad | Page 12 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
Toggle sidebar

Q sending message to Stalberg/Saad

OhHolyToews said:
Conversely, the 3rd line was very good against Minnesota, why break up a good thing? Stalberg playing his game in transition and getting the puck in deep and working the boards sets up the rest of the line. Saying he has done nothing shows a lack of understanding of hockey and how it is a team game.

The 3rd line worked in the first series, worked all year long and you want to break it up to potentially score a bit more? You take what you can get from your depth in the playoffs and our depth was good in round 1.

Some people...
Click to expand...

Correction, Bickell and Shaw were very good against Minnesota...Stalberg was more of a passenger and wasn't playing his game. He has done nothing, he wasn't using his speed, he wasn't getting the puck deep or working the boards.

Q wanted to light a fire under his ass, but instead of taking the criticism, Stalberg went all *****y and is probably getting heat for that too.

I trust Q's decisions, having him in or out of Gm1 isn't going to make a difference in the series. We have more than capable NHLers on this team that can play, it doesn't hurt our depth much at all.
 
Hawkaholic said:
Correction, Bickell and Shaw were very good against Minnesota...Stalberg was more of a passenger and wasn't playing his game. He has done nothing, he wasn't using his speed, he wasn't getting the puck deep or working the boards.

Q wanted to light a fire under his ass, but instead of taking the criticism, Stalberg went all *****y and is probably getting heat for that too.

I trust Q's decisions, having him in or out of Gm1 isn't going to make a difference in the series. We have more than capable NHLers on this team that can play, it doesn't hurt our depth much at all.
Click to expand...

Yes. Carcillo isn't one of them.
 
Hawkaholic said:
Correction, Bickell and Shaw were very good against Minnesota...Stalberg was more of a passenger and wasn't playing his game. He has done nothing, he wasn't using his speed, he wasn't getting the puck deep or working the boards.

Q wanted to light a fire under his ass, but instead of taking the criticism, Stalberg went all *****y and is probably getting heat for that too.

I trust Q's decisions, having him in or out of Gm1 isn't going to make a difference in the series. We have more than capable NHLers on this team that can play, it doesn't hurt our depth much at all.
Click to expand...

Alright, well despite your inability to understand line chemistry, blatant speculation or watch the games, please tell me which player on the Hawks roster currently not playing has been show to be more capable, IN THE NHL, THIS YEAR, than Stalberg?
 
I think it's become clear that Stalberg didnt' want 4th line duty!

Chris Kuc ‏@ChrisKuc 3m
Source said #Blackhawks winger Viktor Stalberg questioned his role--or lack of it--in certain situations.


Chris Kuc ‏@ChrisKuc 7m
Told by source that Viktor Stalberg is sitting Game 1 for #Blackhawks vs. #RedWings not because of poor play or injury.
 
OhHolyToews said:
Alright, well despite your inability to understand line chemistry, blatant speculation or watch the games, please tell me which player on the Hawks roster currently not playing has been show to be more capable, IN THE NHL, THIS YEAR, than Stalberg?
Click to expand...

None, that's why they aren't playing.
 
Chris Kuc ‏@ChrisKuc 15m
#Blackhawks coach Joel Quenneville said winger Viktor Stalberg will not play in Game 1 vs. #RedWings: "Coach's decision."

Chris Kuc ‏@ChrisKuc 6m
Told by source that Viktor Stalberg is sitting Game 1 for #Blackhawks vs. #RedWings not because of poor play or injury.

Chris Kuc ‏@ChrisKuc 2m
Source said #Blackhawks winger Viktor Stalberg questioned his role--or lack of it--in certain situations.

tumblr_mgqabdO41h1r7wgupo1_500.jpg
 
We're sitting Stalberg for complaining about having no PP time?

How about telling him to earn it instead of playing a far inferior hockey player
 
What kind of player questions his role in the middle of the playoffs?

A selfish player, one that shouldn't be near a team that has Cup aspirations.

I'm done here, I support Q (the head coach, one of the best) and his decisions.
 
So you're on one of the best teams in hockey in the 2nd round of the playoffs and think to yourself, "Now is a good time to question my 'role' on the team". Ugh.
 
Hawkaholic said:
What kind of player questions his role in the middle of the playoffs?

A selfish player, one that shouldn't be near a team that has Cup aspirations.

I'm done here, I support Q (the head coach, one of the best) and his decisions.
Click to expand...

In all fairness to both our sides here, I guess its all relative

Did Stalberg pull a Mike Rupp and just leave practice when he wasn't getting time with the PP units? Or did he go into Q's office and ask why his PP time was cut so offensive wizard Marcus Kruger can play over a minute per game on the PP?
 
theaub said:
In all fairness to both our sides here, I guess its all relative

Did Stalberg pull a Mike Rupp and just leave practice when he wasn't getting time with the PP units? Or did he go into Q's office and ask why his PP time was cut so offensive wizard Marcus Kruger can play over a minute per game on the PP?
Click to expand...

Chris Kuc ‏@ChrisKuc 2m
@JayZawaski670 I'm told Stalberg questioned his role to coaches (not sure which one) on his role.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom