You say this as if I or anyone else would give a shit if you one day decided to do thatThats fair, I also go out of my way to crap on Cricket, F1, Rugby, and most soccer leagues, not to mention things like video game subthreads about forenight, CS, Second Life, and War Craft - its must indifference of these things that keep me involved in posting about them. Wait, that doesn't make sense at all... oh ya, I've never ever posted about any of this stuff because I don't care. But now I do, for some reason, very odd.
Oh man, did we just become friends? I dont give a shit if you love hockey or shuffleboard, I just dont like people that run though and gate keep their sports. As a far of women's sports, that gate keeping is brutal. As a hockey fan, its probably the worst version of it. Can you just let people love the sport no matter their skill level? Then we are friends.You say this as if I or anyone else would give a shit if you one day decided to do that
The womens game is fine IMO, it is what it is. Cages dont stop us seeing those people because, as a personal that loves the NHL, non-fans cant tell the difference between a full shield and a half shield. The change comes with showing characters (ahem, PASTA) while wearing their jerseys between play.I would do the following:
1. Reduce size or weight of pucks a bit so women can have the same velocity in shooting as men, that will make the game more exciting and punish team that turtle around their own net as women have harder scoring from distance.
2. Allow hitting full on, will make for some drama and increase emotional investment from fans and create more competitive tension between teams!
3. Remove cages and full shields to make players more personal on the ice. Its annoying only seeing cages and no personalities out there.
That could be a good start in the right direction! And thats coming from someone that watches womens hockey every week and has been for years.
This, one of the main reasons for small market leagues like this to fail is when even the few people that want to follow it don’t have an easy/inexpensive way to follow it. They are off to a bad start with how today I wanted to check the scores and their website wasn’t giving live score updates.Depends how accessible they make it for me as a hockey fan and cable cutter. If the PWHL makes me jumps through hoops to watch, not making games available to watch online or charging an exorbitant price for an esoteric streaming plan, not having a radio broadcast available online, etc., I probably won't bother. As a Yank cable-cutter, every year I try to follow the WJC from preliminary round to final, but due to the difficulty of actually following a game through legal means, I end up just boxscore checking every other day and the IIHF sees none of my money.
Professional girls’ hockey? Really?
Wow! Not too sure how this league will survive. Can’t see fans flicking to girls’ hockey. There’s just no visceral connection to mske a fan buy in. Hope they can make it, but seriously doubt they will. 1 season and then it’s done imo.Indeed. The Premier Federation has existed for 4 years.
"Daryl Watts took a financial hit when the Premier Hockey League was bought out and the Professional Women's Hockey League took its place. The 24-year-old forward from Toronto signed a two-year contract in January with the PHF's Toronto Six that would have paid her a league-record $150,000 US in 2023-24."
With the PWHL she will make just 55 000$, so she lost 2/3s of her salary when the PWHPA nuked the Premier Federation!
One key difference being that if you aren't into F1 or another sport you can just ignore it and not consume any of that content. In the context of the PWHL, Sportsnet, as an example, is likely going to try to make it part of every single NHL broadcast for the rest of the season, so it's a bit harder to simply ignore like you are suggesting.My only other point is why poo-poo something you don't give a crap about? Just let it be. I think F1 is the dumbest 'sport' in the world, but its popular. My reference to it in 2 posts on the HF boards is literally the extent of my interaction with it in 37 years of my life. Live that way, its easier than trying to crap on everything I don't like.
Has this happened?One key difference being that if you aren't into F1 or another sport you can just ignore it and not consume any of that content. In the context of the PWHL, Sportsnet, as an example, is likely going to try to make it part of every single NHL broadcast for the rest of the season, so it's a bit harder to simply ignore like you are suggesting.
Do you doubt that it will? I can't give you a definitive answer for today since it's day one for the league and the only NHL game today was the TNT broadcast and not Sportsnet, but the Sportsnet panel has definitely talked about the PWHL in the past. Additional example is how the NHL has had female players in the ASG a few years now.Has this happened?
This is a lot of words to say 'No'.Do you doubt that it will? I can't give you a definitive answer for today since it's day one for the league and the only NHL game today was the TNT broadcast and not Sportsnet, but the Sportsnet panel has definitely talked about the PWHL in the past. Additional example is how the NHL has had female players in the ASG a few years now.
My point is that you are advising people to just 'ignore' it as if it's F1 or table tennis or something totally unrelated, when in reality there is likely going to be an attempt by the NHL and Sportsnet to wrap it into NHL discussion to try to drive awareness. It's just not as clear cut a division as you implied.
I just like high quality hockey and I do not believe the women's game is high quality
Good thing I am in no way gatekeeping thenOh man, did we just become friends? I dont give a shit if you love hockey or shuffleboard, I just dont like people that run though and gate keep their sports. As a far of women's sports, that gate keeping is brutal. As a hockey fan, its probably the worst version of it. Can you just let people love the sport no matter their skill level? Then we are friends.
I pretty clearly said that it's been discussed in past Sportsnet broadcasts, but I can't answer definitively since the PWHL season started since there has been one NHL game since that happened and it wasn't even a Sportsnet broadcast.This is a lot of words to say 'No'.
I mean it has started a bit. When doing their "favourite moments of 2023" with Kelly Hrudey, Kevin Bieksa, and Jennifer Botterill, the males gave NHL answers (Vegas championship, Bedard arrival) while Botterill said the creation of the PWHL was hers.Has this happened?
I would do the following:
1. Reduce size or weight of pucks a bit so women can have the same velocity in shooting as men, that will make the game more exciting and punish team that turtle around their own net as women have harder scoring from distance.
2. Allow hitting full on, will make for some drama and increase emotional investment from fans and create more competitive tension between teams!
3. Remove cages and full shields to make players more personal on the ice. Its annoying only seeing cages and no personalities out there. New fans need to recognize the players easily.
That could be a good start in the right direction! And thats coming from someone that watches womens hockey every week and has been for years.
His overall idea makes sense though as the NA sports market is over saturated and it's easier to gain a new market than trying to steal an existing market away.The idea that women have some obligation to watch is ridiculous.
Fair enough good friend, let's toast to the new women's hockey league, and hope they have nothing but success. Your support is appreciated.Good thing I am in no way gatekeeping then
Right so you don't have an example, you can just say 'not yet' too.I pretty clearly said that it's been discussed in past Sportsnet broadcasts, but I can't answer definitively since the PWHL season started since there has been one NHL game since that happened and it wasn't even a Sportsnet broadcast.
You're the one that compared F1 to another hockey league as if it's just as easy to ignore.
How about this then - there's a 3v3 PWHL game in this year's ASG. Does that make it easier for you to understand that people can't just ignore it while consuming NHL content?
Your point about soccer doesn't work though as hockey fans don't need to leave the continent to see those 7 better leagues and that's what makes this leagues success so much more difficult.I agree with your first point, mostly. The crux of it anyway - for women's leagues to succeed, they do need support from women (and men).
The second point I have a problem with. The MLS is, what, the 8th best league in the world? Maybe? And when it started, even lower? Premier league fans shitting all over the MLS and making fun of it's competition level brought absolutely zero to the table. It didn't help the premier league, it didn't help the MLS, it didn't help the game overall, it just made:
1. Assholes feel better about themselves, despite never touching the field, for WATCHING the 'better' game
2. Kept casual fans away for no reason other than the as described point one people gate keeping and being loud
I don't give a shit if you go to a game or not, nor what you think about the league. I don't care about the league, but I also dont go to or give a shit about the AHL. Whats important is that I don't run around telling everyone how I don't give a shit about the AHL, and that anyone that does is an idiot.
Reflect. grow up, be better.