- Jun 13, 2010
- 42,061
- 20,708
Good news here, whoever gets #3 - Pickering or Koivunen - the other is practically the automatic #4.
Went with Murashov. Granted it is based on more limited sample size, but he has been impressive in what little I have seen…. Also, Russia has been producing such impressive goaltenders in the past 15ish years…. Hoping he’s the next great one.
Good news here, whoever gets #3 - Pickering or Koivunen - the other is practically the automatic #4.
Well that would just be wrong and they should feel bad.Not necessarily. What if all the people who voted for Pickering vote for Murashov?
Well that would just be wrong and they should feel bad.
Next poll will be like:Nah. Murashov has the highest potential of the remaining prospects. He's the logical # 4 here after Pickering if you have any mindfulness in your life.
Ponomarev next for me. And I have plenty of mindfulness.Nah. Murashov has the highest potential of the remaining prospects. He's the logical # 4 here after Pickering if you have any mindfulness in your life.
Same. Though I have a feeling I will have to change my vote.Ponomarev next for me. And I have plenty of mindfulness.
Ponomarev next for me. And I have plenty of mindfulness.
Highest ceiling and isn't that far away from being ready to find out if he will realize that potential. I like Murashov's potential as well but i think its a longer and more winding road to get there. Pickering's close to Koivunen, but the ceiling is lower. Pickering could wind up as a Dumoulin level player. Koivunen has Guentzel potential.I think Koivunen has the highest ceiling of the remaining players, so I picked him.
The fact that he doesn't have much playing time in North America does give me a bit of pause, so I can see why someone would choose Pickering over him.
I like Koivunen but he most certainly does not.Highest ceiling and isn't that far away from being ready to find out if he will realize that potential. I like Murashov's potential as well but i think its a longer and more winding road to get there. Pickering's close to Koivunen, but the ceiling is lower. Pickering could wind up as a Dumoulin level player. Koivunen has Guentzel potential.
Highest ceiling and isn't that far away from being ready to find out if he will realize that potential. I like Murashov's potential as well but i think its a longer and more winding road to get there. Pickering's close to Koivunen, but the ceiling is lower. Pickering could wind up as a Dumoulin level player. Koivunen has Guentzel potential.
Koivunen looks like a much more tenacious player than Puusy, he's all gas no brakes. His game seems much better suited for the way the game is evolving.
If Koivunen turns into a 40 goal scorer I will pose naked for one of Trouba’s paintings.
If he turns into a 50-60 point winger I’ll be overjoyed.
I’ll wear just a tie and he can call it the “business man”.You have to cover your naked body in paint and jump against a canvas to do a Trouba piece.
I don’t know shit about goalie prospects so I generally don’t vote for themYeah, I'd go Murashov and then Pono or Poulin with Koivunen after those guys.
Indeed. Puustinen has some speed and skill but nothing earth shattering. Kid needs to get a fire lit under him if he wants to stay with the big boys.Koivunen looks like a much more tenacious player than Puusy, he's all gas no brakes. His game seems much better suited for the way the game is evolving.
Koivunen has Lehkonen potential if he figures it out & puts it all together.Highest ceiling and isn't that far away from being ready to find out if he will realize that potential. I like Murashov's potential as well but i think its a longer and more winding road to get there. Pickering's close to Koivunen, but the ceiling is lower. Pickering could wind up as a Dumoulin level player. Koivunen has Guentzel potential.
Koivunen has Lehkonen potential if he figures it out & puts it all together.
40-50 points a season NHLer was my thought, that's allI don't see the comparsion at all there.