Big Muddy
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2019
- 8,964
- 4,329
???? so you want to guess at something you don’t know????? But you want your uneducated guess to mean more than mine????
The escalator has been used multiple times in years. For your “percentage of a percentage” theory to be correct. The escalator would have increase as a function of the amount of free agents. It got used as a full 5% and sometimes .5%. You have no evidence that the determining factor was the number of free agents.
Mckenzie and LeBrun have continually mentioned how escrow will be lower this year. It will be the lowest in ages.
star RFAs took shorter deals to hedge against the giant cap explosion that is expected in 2 years.
There are 2 known facts. 1.) that escrow is lower this year due to lower payouts
2.) that dramatic cap increases are expected with the next deals.
There is no doubt that what I am saying is the truth. The only question is how much it will actually affect the cap this year.
I think you are not understanding what I said. I was just pointing out that there is a much larger percentage of players already under contract versus the players needing a new contract in any given year.
And, when the NHLPA puts the escalator percentage to a vote, the majority rules and perhaps the majority will vote the way they did last year. Based on data that I saw, escrow levels increased over several years after 2011. Maybe the players got increasingly frustrated over escrow & escrow increases and decided to take action.
The current contract between the NHL and the Comcast owned NBC and NBC SportsNet expires at the end of the 2021-22 season.
Any ways, going to move on to another topic versus beating this one to death & I hope it goes up to $88 m next year.
Last edited: