7- Buffalo (The most mediocre team in the past 20 years)
Mediocre means like, middling. The Sabres had like two seasons where they were good and like 12 where they were absolutely terrible. They're not close to mediocre.
Yeah I mean, Avs had sv% like that in the playoffs and won the cup. People always seem to post these stats, but Campbell was 0.914 in the playoffs, wasn't the reason you lost at the end of the season.
What I'm saying is that in the context of that chart which was an entirely different stat, how is being 2 goals higher than expected, bad? It seems totally fine, other than the fact that he's ranked 68, but then we need to see how many goalies are ahead of him that played like less than 10 games because the chart seems disingenuous having so many guys with miniscule sample sizes on there.
It's about provided value, not ability. If Vasilevskiy were to look like shit and put up an .890 save percentage next year, and then leave, you could reasonably say the Lightning shouldn't have moved him because Vasilevskiy is good and that was a weird fluke, but you couldn't really justify saying the Lightning should be worse than the year before based on losing him, because the year before hew as terrible. Doesn't really matter if the goalies ahead of him were in small samples, the teams got those values.
Anyway, I don't think Murray is very good but I don't know if any other team could replace a guy who was a 29 year old AHLer/backup until a year and a half ago with a 28 year old with two Cup rings and get criticized for it, but here we are.
Campbell had an .897 in the playoffs.
The real killer thing is that Vasilevskiy sucked too. Meanwhile, against Montreal he played well, and Carey Price played like Patrick Roy.