Is he completely checked out? He must know by now his group isn't good enough to be able to win enough to save his job before Xmas. Just a matter of time.
This is more of a reply to your post in the GDT from lat night where you said ...
"
Not to pile it on but if we are being honest, when has two big long-term UFA signings gone so south so quickly? Not just the Bruns, I mean league-wide?
If Zadorov and Lindholm had zero trade protection, does any NHL GM take on either of those contracts? Would any sane GM believe either player is still in the NHL 5-6-7 years from now? What GM takes on vitrually guaranteed buy-outs, at least they way this is already trending?
What does Jacobs think about the $84 million Sweeney and Neely committed to these two players?"
I understand what you are saying.
Now if it were only the two big FA signings that were playing below expectations then that would be a concern.
However, when multiple players, overall team structure, and team play have fallen so far below what was expected not only of fans, but by the players and management, and the coach says he doesn't have any answers; I think they really have no choice than to make a change behind the bench.
Before we go blaming all the players - bring in a new voice, a new system and game structure to see if things improve.
If game structure and different aspects of team play improve, such as defensive zone coverage, pk & pp, offensive zone setup , but they still struggle to score goals then Sweeny can attempt to make a trade or two to address that issue.
If Sweeny fails to make moves of significance that improve the roster, then he is fair game to be replaced as well. Of course roster improvements are 'usually' more productive during the off season, so judgment on Sweeney may be put off ntil next season.
It may or may not be fair to Montgomery, but the way things currently are, they need to start there with a change. Even if just an internal interm replacement.