Post-Game Talk: Post Game NYI down the Jets

Status
Not open for further replies.

Howard Chuck

Registered User
Jan 24, 2012
15,801
20,556
Winnipeg
Yes Howard, I get all that -
But this is a PGT and I was commenting on the game - not the year, or last year or the history of the team.
My sarcasm was more in light of how we can't look at a game without dragging in all the negatives from past games / seasons.
Fair enough. I guess that should really go in the coaching thread.
 

tbcwpg

Moderator
Jan 25, 2011
16,685
20,172
Hellebuyck looked weak on both goals. The first goal he took forever getting over and was really deep in his net. He was outplayed by the other goalie, pure and simple.
Yes, a good team should not lose a game after giving up two goals, but we're not a good team right now.

I think going after Hellebuyck for his play last night is digging a bit far into nitpicking territory. He was very good.
 

DannyGallivan

Your world frightens and confuses me
Aug 25, 2017
7,627
10,338
Melonville
I think going after Hellebuyck for his play last night is digging a bit far into nitpicking territory. He was very good.
He made three great saves, gave up two weak goals. I'll give him a plus 1 on that scale. So yes, even if he gave up three or four weak goals, the Jets had enough chances to legitimately have outscored the Islanders.

...and if I hear one more excuse that the Jets penalty killers are too "new" to understand the nuances of our system, I'll puke. Our passive system simply sucks - period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aries56 and 1stDan

JetsWillFly4Ever

Registered User
May 21, 2011
6,381
9,585
Winnipeg MB.
I can’t believe I just read this, lol. Copp doesn’t get anywhere near the top 6 on a decent team.
Probably not (though we did just see the much worse Tanev go to the top 6 in PIT), but neither does Little.

Little has been ineffective with those wingers 5v5 for a while, Copp is at least helping defensively and getting good possession numbers. I'd prefer the Jets to ride it out with Copp for a larger sample.
 

1stDan

Registered User
Jan 6, 2018
348
353
He made three great saves, gave up two weak goals. I'll give him a plus 1 on that scale. So yes, even if he gave up three or four weak goals, the Jets had enough chances to legitimately have outscored the Islanders.

...and if I hear one more excuse that the Jets penalty killers are too "new" to understand the nuances of our system, I'll puke. Our passive system simply sucks - period.
This is one of the few complaints I can really get behind. All of the high% PK teams run a very aggressive kill these days.
 

nobody imp0rtant

Registered pessimist
May 23, 2018
10,945
18,293
He made three great saves, gave up two weak goals. I'll give him a plus 1 on that scale. So yes, even if he gave up three or four weak goals, the Jets had enough chances to legitimately have outscored the Islanders.

...and if I hear one more excuse that the Jets penalty killers are too "new" to understand the nuances of our system, I'll puke. Our passive system simply sucks - period.

Great saves are often a product of luck. Weak goals on the other hand often indicate a deficiency. Bottom line, a mistake is a mistake, and the good never negates the bad. It's not like reffing. :sarcasm:

 
  • Like
Reactions: macmaroon

googleIsMyFriend

Registered User
Dec 6, 2016
218
99
I liked how well jets played in this game. Jets did outmuscle, outwork and outshot opponent but they just couldn't score. I was little bit of surprised that they did shoot blanks, but that is hockey i suppose. Anyway, very promising game.

PoMo is actually good coach. 2nd and 3rd line were on fire today and their TOI was quite high. I liked it. Patty is a beast at the moment, he should shoot more i think. Playmaker-Patrik is a good thing, but he should be more selfish. Heinola played well, he should stay in NHL. He doesn't need to play all the 82 games, when he is tired put him in the PB. This would be a great way to get in NHL.

PK Still suck.
 

DannyGallivan

Your world frightens and confuses me
Aug 25, 2017
7,627
10,338
Melonville
Great saves are often a product of luck. Weak goals on the other hand often indicate a deficiency. Bottom line, a mistake is a mistake, and the good never negates the bad. It's not like reffing. :sarcasm:


Absolutely love that commercial.

And as far as great saves goes, so much of it is positional. You ever notice that almost all the time, when you see a great glove save in slow motion replay, the puck more or less was shot into the glove before the goalie made his grand follow-through.
 

AKAChip

Registered User
Nov 19, 2013
3,162
4,561
Winnipeg
He made three great saves, gave up two weak goals. I'll give him a plus 1 on that scale. So yes, even if he gave up three or four weak goals, the Jets had enough chances to legitimately have outscored the Islanders.

...and if I hear one more excuse that the Jets penalty killers are too "new" to understand the nuances of our system, I'll puke. Our passive system simply sucks - period.
Penalty killing is extremely easy. Really the only way you can screw it up is by playing too passive. It’s unbelievable how simple the fix is and yet...
 

Jetfaninflorida

Southernmost Jet Fan
Dec 13, 2013
15,758
19,163
Florida
The Jets won't do well in the West trying to play a predominantly perimeter offense. Our forwards are showing a complete reluctance to go to the net against eastern conference teams (Lowry excepted). We are going to be an easy stop on the schedule for Western conference teams other than bottom dwellers like the Wild if what we have seen through the first 9 games is representative of how we are going to play this year.
 

rkp

Registered User
Mar 31, 2011
3,159
2,415
I don't see the players quitting on the coach....sometimes their motivation is questionable.
A new coach will only confirm the depth issues and character issues in the locker room.
Who will we blame then. Edmonton tried 5 (?) Different coaches same result.

The new reality.


and how long should this group of players/org stick with PoMo?...till they are no longer functional as players....look at Buffalo, St Louis and yes Edmonton with a new coach..

Buff is missed on PP&PK...don't want him back
Time is needed to gel with 5 key losses of personnel
Cap hockey sucks
 

Robinson2187

Registered Schmoozer
Nov 22, 2015
2,574
2,143
Comox BC
My ongoing frustration with Wheeler stems less from the giving, more from the receiving. He can be a real klutz out there. I don't recall when I first started noticing this but it's been quite a while, certainly last season and probably beyond. Maybe I'm just excessively focused on it now, but every game I can't help but shake my head at the number of times the flow of play is disrupted because he's bobbled a puck put right on his stick.

I wish someone would go all Colonel Jessup on him.

View attachment 265987
Yeah he's always been a bit of a klutz at times. His first 2 or 3 games were outstanding, going to the net more, skating great and more upright and controlling the puck better. He's fallen off a bit.
 

raideralex99

Whiteout Is Coming.
Dec 18, 2015
5,215
10,540
West Coast
He made three great saves, gave up two weak goals. I'll give him a plus 1 on that scale. So yes, even if he gave up three or four weak goals, the Jets had enough chances to legitimately have outscored the Islanders.

...and if I hear one more excuse that the Jets penalty killers are too "new" to understand the nuances of our system, I'll puke. Our passive system simply sucks - period.
Watch that first goal again. Hellebuyck was screened on that play ... he had to look around the Islander player who was standing right in front of him. That split second to see who had the puck made him a second too late to get all the way across the crease.
This is WFT is matter with the Jets PP nobody goes to the front of the net. I guess they are scared to get hit by a Laine shot or a big defenceman ... wimps. Seriously any goalie can stop a puck they can see from the blue line.
 

Jimmyjets

Registered User
Oct 22, 2014
1,316
1,632
I keep seeing 55 taking the last draws while 17 was on the ice, haunting my dreams

Was so strange. After the icing the Jets bench was screaming they wanted the faceoff at the other dot but the linesman wouldn't move it over. Then the Jets called a timeout but I just wonder what the screw up was there and who elects which dot they use?

Who said they wanted it on that dot? The coaches clearly wanted it on the other side so Lowry could take the draw. Linesman doesn't move it over. We lose the draw and they pot an empty netter. Just the cherry on top of a frustrating game that we should have won.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sipowicz

sipowicz

The thrill is gone
Mar 16, 2011
32,260
43,251
Probably not (though we did just see the much worse Tanev go to the top 6 in PIT), but neither does Little.

Little has been ineffective with those wingers 5v5 for a while, Copp is at least helping defensively and getting good possession numbers. I'd prefer the Jets to ride it out with Copp for a larger sample.

There's never been a problem with Little's defensive game! Even most Copp proponents just have to admit, 1 goal and 2 assists through 9 games playing with Connor and Ehlers isn't good. Copp doesn't make Connor or Ehlers better and in fact takes away from their potential offence, anyone but Copp with Connor and Ehlers would be a huge improvement!
 

Howard Chuck

Registered User
Jan 24, 2012
15,801
20,556
Winnipeg
Watch that first goal again. Hellebuyck was screened on that play ... he had to look around the Islander player who was standing right in front of him. That split second to see who had the puck made him a second too late to get all the way across the crease.
This is WFT is matter with the Jets PP nobody goes to the front of the net. I guess they are scared to get hit by a Laine shot or a big defenceman ... wimps. Seriously any goalie can stop a puck they can see from the blue line.
Both PP goals in the previous game as well.

I don't know why we never have anyone in front of the net, either on the PP or 5x5.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad