Agreed, maybe C-. I'd add Mrazek to the disappointment column as well.
I suppose. Hard to rate him in only 5 periods in the net though.
Agreed, maybe C-. I'd add Mrazek to the disappointment column as well.
That's a large part of the 'disappointment'.I suppose. Hard to rate him in only 5 periods in the net though.
Kase - A
Bunting - A
Kampf - B+
Mrazek - B-
Ritchie - C-
overall: B
I bet you can guess who sits in the front row.What subject do you teach and how do I get into your class? Could use and easy A
How are we rating the key additions now that we've seen the players for a dozen or so games?
It's almost like everything Dubas touches turns to shit
I don't fault Dubas from moving on from Andersen.More important how are we grading those key losses and players considered expendables?
Zach Hyman .. 11 games 7-3-10 points who is currently outproducing our Rocket Richard winner Matthews 10 games 5-3-8 points.
Jared McCann .. 8 games 3-4-7 points who is outproducing > Ritchie 13 games 0-1-1 points + Kase 13 games 1-1-2 points + Kampf 13 games 1-0-1 point [= 39 games 2 goals 2 assists 4 points] combined.
Freddy Andersen .. 10 games 9-1-0 record (1st overall) & GA/G = 1.73 (4th) & SV% = .939 (Tied-5th) >>> Petr Mrazek (on LTIR) 1-1-0 record & GA/G = 4.20 & SV% = .877
This could have been soooooo easy ...
- Don't protect Holl $2.0 mil in expansion but Jared McCann (@$2.9 mil) instead.
- Don't sign Ritchie + Kase + Kampf for $5.25 mil but re-sign Hyman instead.
- Don't waste $3.5 mil on injured Mrazek but re-sign Andersen @$4.5 mil to tandem with Campbell.
- Cut/waive Engvall and sign Michael Bunting instead.
What this all shows is last years players & team >>> this years new players and team, BUT last years players and team was not good enough to win a playoff round as heavy favourites.
However if the team direction is downwards by the transactions made intended to improve, how does that effect the grade performance of the GM?
Leafs currently on pace for 95 points = marginal playoff team / wild card.
'We can and we will'One by one the shine of each of this summer's value signings is starting to wear off. Bunting is holding the fort but even he is slowing down as well.
God help us if we have to go through another attempt to fix things next summer.
This could have been soooooo easy ...
- Don't protect Holl $2.0 mil in expansion but Jared McCann (@$2.9 mil) instead.
- Don't sign Ritchie + Kase + Kampf for $5.25 mil but re-sign Hyman instead.
- Don't waste $3.5 mil on injured Mrazek but re-sign Andersen @$4.5 mil to tandem with Campbell.
- Cut/waive Engvall and sign Michael Bunting instead.
** Essentially a few minor tweaks and we could have brought back last years team and been in a better position today.
One by one the shine of each of this summer's value signings is starting to wear off. Bunting is holding the fort but even he is slowing down as well.
God help us if we have to go through another attempt to fix things next summer.
More important how are we grading those key losses and players considered expendables?
Zach Hyman .. 11 games 7-3-10 points who is currently outproducing our Rocket Richard winner Matthews 10 games 5-3-8 points.
Jared McCann .. 8 games 3-4-7 points who is outproducing > Ritchie 13 games 0-1-1 points + Kase 13 games 1-1-2 points + Kampf 13 games 1-0-1 point [= 39 games 2 goals 2 assists 4 points] combined.
Freddy Andersen .. 10 games 9-1-0 record (1st overall) & GA/G = 1.73 (4th) & SV% = .939 (Tied-5th) >>> Petr Mrazek (on LTIR) 1-1-0 record & GA/G = 4.20 & SV% = .877
This could have been soooooo easy ...
- Don't protect Holl $2.0 mil in expansion but Jared McCann (@$2.9 mil) instead.
- Don't sign Ritchie + Kase + Kampf for $5.25 mil but re-sign Hyman instead.
- Don't waste $3.5 mil on injured Mrazek but re-sign Andersen @$4.5 mil to tandem with Campbell.
- Cut/waive Engvall and sign Michael Bunting instead.
** Essentially a few minor tweaks and we could have brought back last years team and been in a better position today.
What this all shows is last years players & team >>> this years new players and team, BUT last years players and team was not good enough to win a playoff round as heavy favourites.
However if the team direction is downwards by the transactions made intended to improve, how does that effect the grade performance of the GM?
Leafs currently on pace for 95 points = marginal playoff team / wild card.
I don't fault Dubas from moving on from Andersen.
That's an annual event now isn't it?
They'll need to shuffle the deck chairs again to pay for the raises to Reilly, Campbell, and to a lesser degree Sandin and Liljegren.
Freddy Andersen's league best numbers in most goalie stats categories in front of a Carolina built team, sure look different then Andersen numbers ever did in front of a Dubas built team did.
Andersen's best personal stats as a Leaf goalie was back in 2017-18 with 38 wins and record setting 105 point Leafs team.
Then the Leafs changed GM's and Andersen's stats began to decline each year thereafter, until he was set free and now he is back on top again.
I wonder what conclusions we could draw from that, when grading GM performance even if we didn't want that player back?
your build + core are probably wrong.
It’s the same thing over and over again.But they care deeply and will develop that killer instinct any year now.
It’s the same thing over and over again.
String of good games then a series of failing to start on time, followed by an epic loss to a Zamboni driver or restroom attendant.
Prople think we crap on them for a 5-7 game stint but it really is a continuation of every lack of intensity, killer instinct, what have you. If you don’t have it now, sorry.
It’s the collection of the 4 plus the salary of the 4 that will be the nail in the coffin.
Switch a Marner/Nylander with a Marchand type, free some money to upgrade Engvall/Kerfoots to guys like a Justin Williams, Oshie, Palmeri, etc. or continue in the same loop we are in.
Andersen will be judged by his playoff performance. It's a wait and see at this point.Freddy Andersen's league best numbers in most goalie stats categories in front of a Carolina built team, sure look different then Andersen numbers ever did in front of a Dubas built team did.
Andersen's best personal stats as a Leaf goalie was back in 2017-18 with 38 wins and record setting 105 point Leafs team.
Then the Leafs changed GM's and Andersen's stats began to decline each year thereafter, until he was set free and now he is back on top again.
I wonder what conclusions we could draw from that, when grading GM performance even if we didn't want that player back?