Yeah Jim Nill and Steve Yzerman sure are bad at their jobs… they also just pass out HHOF credentials to idiots, reaching… We are taking the last five years of Holland in Detroit and turning it into a referendum on a guy that has been in hockey management and scouting roles for 40 years. I choose the bigger sample size. A team he just played a massive part in just booked his 7th trip to the finals, all luck I am sure…
Part of the problem here is that people are conflating two topics: the aptitude of Ken Holland throughout his career, and how likeable he is now that he's no longer with the Wings.
I can say he still has talent as a general manager and root against him based on his last several years in Detroit.
And that last part doesn't have to have anything to do with his former success here, because sports is entertainment, not a marriage. Kenny could have been perfect for 50 years, but if he's at least partly responsible for a product heading the wrong way on the entertainment scale - which, as a customer, can be based on whatever subjective and illogical criteria I choose - I can choose to no longer support him because he's screwing with what I find entertaining. Really, the most LOGICAL stance in fandom is the bandwagon fan, because that's based on current return on investment instead of sentiment or perceived loyalty/tradition/etc.
So everybody is free to cheer for or against whomever they please. But Holland having won big in Detroit certainly doesn't mean the fans owe him anything.