Duchene2MacKinnon
In the hands of Genius
- Aug 8, 2006
- 47,599
- 10,426
No lines. If you can’t clearly determine with the naked eye that it’s clearly offside in the time between the goal and the restart, it stands.Yes. Give VAR one line. No zooming in. Problem solved.
One line is my compromise. But zero line(s) is best.No lines. If you can’t clearly determine with the naked eye that it’s clearly offside in the time between the goal and the restart, it stands.
I can live with that one but had that happened pre-VAR, I wouldn't have thought "wow, that's a travesty."
Frank Lampard kicking the ball all the way to Botswana at the 2010 World Cup and the ref saying it didn't cross the line is the type of call I want to see overturned or you end up doing more harm than good.
Yes. Give VAR one line. No zooming in. Problem solved.
Two things to me make it different. Salah had more possession than Welbeck did. The PK was called on the field, not from upstairs.I know I'm the guy that can't let it go, but I just can't with you guys right now. Not going to talk about it again, I'm sure everyone is sick of it, but...
You just saw a play like this given 4 weeks ago, only with even less contact, and everyone said it was "stonewall"...
Well, this year we need to look at the facts. They choose their favorites and try to create a close title race. I've noticed that Man City have been getting every small decision apart from the Leicester game. Leicester always get decisions in their favour. VAR never sees their red card incidents. Chelsea got two soft penalties against Palace, a soft penalty against Brighton and had a goal stand after a Havertz handball against West Brom.
Things like these are not given with VAR, when it is one of the leagues favorites.![]()
That’s my point though. You shouldn’t be able to reverse what the naked eye can’t see.The reason you can’t do this is inconsistent angles. There are definitely some that look way onside or offside even with a line on the pitch but turn out the other way when you use the Hawkeye stuff.
Also, Klopp v. Chris Wilder isn't the cage match I expected this season, but it's a PPV I would 100% pay for.
Mane being fairly ruled offside would have been beneficial to my team? What?“I can live with that one”.... lol of course you can it would be beneficial to your team.
That’s my point though. You shouldn’t be able to reverse what the naked eye can’t see.
I think Savant put it perfectly. You're going too far when you have to start drawing lines instead of looking at it.Mane was very clearly offside. If that had been allowed to stand it would have definitely qualified as a travesty in a one goal game.
The Salah one was close, but still clearly offside in the replay. It wasn’t a case of debating over which pixel was used or where the arm begins and shoulder stops. It wouldn’t have been a travesty if it’s stood obviously, but I also don’t know how you can possibly implement offside reviews and not have that called back.
I mean this goes back to the “tie goes to the runner” scenario. I stand by what I said. If you need to zoom into armpits and toenails it shouldn’t be over turned. The lines aren’t consistent either because the VAR official gets to redraw them over and over. If you have to zoom in and use multiple cameras it is no longer “clear and obvious”But in those cases the naked eye probably could see it if you had a better camera angle. It’s like trying to judge if the ball went over the goal line from the standard midfield TV angle. Yea in obvious cases you can, but the close ones you really can’t because you don’t have a good angle.
Yeah you are right. Typing too fast. Meant to have the word early in there.The issue isn’t a Saturday game, Liverpool needs to play today, it’s the 12:30 local kickoff as opposed to 4:30 or 7pm.
I think Savant put it perfectly. You're going too far when you have to start drawing lines instead of looking at it.
Every City vs Burnley game, City scores early and Dyche quits. Or they drag it out and pray for 0-0. Morons. I hope they get relegated I am sick of them.City is going to win this game by a TD.
This should be a no brainer decision. The burnout for these players is going to be insane between the already intense schedule and the Euros and WC coming up fast.or you know go to five subs.
I was just thinking this might be the most uninspiring fixture that happens in a PL season.Every City vs Burnley game, City scores early and Dyche quits. Or they drag it out and pray for 0-0. Morons. I hope they get relegated I am sick of them.