66-30-33
Registered User
Curious...if Bruins let Halak go be a UFA and use Swayman as their backup next season would you guys want Pens to sign Halak to backup and mentor Jarry and trade DeSmith?
Halak is going to make double what DeSmith makes on the open market. The time of Halak has long past.Curious...if Bruins let Halak go be a UFA and use Swayman as their backup next season would you guys want Pens to sign Halak to backup and mentor Jarry and trade DeSmith?
I think he will get around the same he's at now.Halak is going to make double what DeSmith makes on the open market. The time of Halak has long past.
Which is almost double DeSmith.I think he will get around the same he's at now.
I mean, it's even lazier to say "we can't criticize anyone specifically because everyone has been shit".
Rask might retire tho.Curious...if Bruins let Halak go be a UFA and use Swayman as their backup next season would you guys want Pens to sign Halak to backup and mentor Jarry and trade DeSmith?
Ah so there goes that, would assume they keep Halak to bring Swayman along.Rask might retire tho.
"This past February, Rask again hinted at retirement when speaking with Matt Porter of The Boston Globe: “I have one year left in the contract, so we'll see if I even play,” he told Porter. When asked if not playing was a “real possibility,” Rask replied: “We'll see. Always a possibility.”"
Rask says he could retire after contract with Bruins expires: report
Might be correct for the three seasons preceding this one - I was including this season and the two before as what will be the three seasons prior to his next contract.
Either way you dice it is a difference, but I don't think it's as important as the season immediately preceding and the high water mark, which are very similar.
Curious...if Bruins let Halak go be a UFA and use Swayman as their backup next season would you guys want Pens to sign Halak to backup and mentor Jarry and trade DeSmith?
Curious...if Bruins let Halak go be a UFA and use Swayman as their backup next season would you guys want Pens to sign Halak to backup and mentor Jarry and trade DeSmith?
I still haven't heard a good argument for why Palms would sign a bargain contract with term.
It's one thing to replace Rust with a good UFA on a sweet deal, it's something else to replace him with a UFA making similar money.
Curious...if Bruins let Halak go be a UFA and use Swayman as their backup next season would you guys want Pens to sign Halak to backup and mentor Jarry and trade DeSmith?
Jarry's a veteran by now. Go with the cheaper DeSmith.
Agreed. It's a very, very rare case when you stumble upon a Vasi or a Gibson or something like that. For the most part, you just need a goalie that's not going to lose you games, not guys that are perennial Vezina all-stars.I feel like the best thing to do with goalies is keep a steady stream of them on the farm. Even above average goalies have a relatively short shelf-life in this league before people get a read on them or they need a change of scenery.
We can criticize, but we should hold Crosby, Guentzel, Malkin, and Letang to the same standard we hold Rust.
He didn't underperform as much as they did the last couple playoff runs. If he's disposable because of those performances, they aren't exempt.
As an aside, I think it's hilarious that some people don't realize that, in the last two playoffs, Crosby has as few points as Malkin and that Bryan Rust's total is only 1 point less than that.
Clearly the only answer is to trade the Russian.
100% fair.
As an aside, I think it's hilarious that some people don't realize that, in the last two playoffs, Crosby has as few points as Malkin and that Bryan Rust's total is only 1 point less than that.
I don't think anyone has been hesitant to criticize Crosby's play in the playoffs?
He sucked in 2018 and was decent in 2019. Just like Malkin was decent in 2018 and sucked in 2019.
I didn't say people weren't willing to criticize Crosby. Hence the use of the word SOME. Implicit in that is that some people, like you, do realize it. But you know damn well there are a handful who don't.
The difference is pretty considerable. The most recent year is the most heavily weighted, I agree, but this year is obviously Palmieri's outlier and track record matters too.
Smith had only 1 season in his last 5 where he scored over .5 P/G when he signed that contract. Palmieri hadn't dipped below .66 P/G in the 5 seasons before this year. That's a huge discrepancy - Palmieri is historically a far more productive player.
Haven't a significant number of Palmeiri's points been on the PP also? Rust does so many of the little things. I don't understand why we would deal him to bring on an older guy. I don't see this trade making us any better. I'd be shocked at Palmeiri getting $3.5m a year. FA's are paid a premium. Rust is definitely worth at least $1.5m per more than him.
If you want to dump salary, start at Petterson and Matheson. We have a great line with Jake - Sid - Rust. Does anyone want to see the likes of Sheary on Sid's line again?