JimmyTwoTimes
Registered User
- Apr 13, 2010
- 19,958
- 5,281
Didn't LC lose their best player though?Just look at Leicester City. Prem champions to relegation fodder in one summer.
Didn't LC lose their best player though?
Soccer analogies?
And ABSOLUTELY hate that hockey is adapting the silly, "bring out a child to the ice" and stand by them, for whatever reason. It is so forced, and I really have no idea what that is supposed to be about. It looks really awkward when they do it in soccer, and the same on the ice.
It is so cringeworthy. Yeah, it's not a good look.The worst...borderline pedophilic. I feel uncomfortable watching it.
He's 20.What exactly is Daniel Sprong at this point? They do not trade him. They won't bring him up. This feels familiar. I would argue that if he isn't going to come up to play with the team he should be sold at the draft for a pick. I doubt his value goes higher and in the end we get very little in return if we do nothing. DO NOT GET ME WRONG, I am huge fan of Sprong, but a bigger fan of the franchise. Either **** or get off the pot with this guy. /rant
What exactly is Daniel Sprong at this point? They do not trade him. They won't bring him up. This feels familiar. I would argue that if he isn't going to come up to play with the team he should be sold at the draft for a pick. I doubt his value goes higher and in the end we get very little in return if we do nothing. DO NOT GET ME WRONG, I am huge fan of Sprong, but a bigger fan of the franchise. Either **** or get off the pot with this guy. /rant
What exactly is Daniel Sprong at this point? They do not trade him. They won't bring him up. This feels familiar. I would argue that if he isn't going to come up to play with the team he should be sold at the draft for a pick. I doubt his value goes higher and in the end we get very little in return if we do nothing. DO NOT GET ME WRONG, I am huge fan of Sprong, but a bigger fan of the franchise. Either **** or get off the pot with this guy. /rant
And you want to sell him for a pick? You do realize the pick you're going to get won't be playing in the NHL either until 2023-24?
As premature as AverageJoeFan's post is, I was curious to see when Sprong became waiver-eligible, so I checked the Waivers Calculator and was a bit surprised to see that it's next year...'18-'19. So this is the last season where he can develop in the minors, thanks to the useless stint we gave him in '15-'16.
Starting next fall he's either playing in the NHL, eating nachos in the press box, or demoted and scooped up by another team.
Feel like he needs to establish himself by the deadline next season, otherwise we need to deal him before we tank his value.
That's ok. He'll be on the team full-time as early as next season.I hate that Sprong gets punished for not being a "complete player"
But Kuhn and Rowney are not complete players either....
Feel like he needs to establish himself by the deadline next season, otherwise we need to deal him before we tank his value.
I hate that Sprong gets punished for not being a "complete player"
But Kuhn and Rowney are not complete players either....
What exactly is Daniel Sprong at this point? They do not trade him. They won't bring him up. This feels familiar. I would argue that if he isn't going to come up to play with the team he should be sold at the draft for a pick. I doubt his value goes higher and in the end we get very little in return if we do nothing. DO NOT GET ME WRONG, I am huge fan of Sprong, but a bigger fan of the franchise. Either **** or get off the pot with this guy. /rant