IMHO this ends up going down as the best and biggest bluff ever, signing Murray this early all but insures MAF will he sought out for a trade and given the option if he doesn't find a suitor to be bought out.
Otherwise it'll go down as a blunder. LV won't bother taking the 2nd or whatever is offer to not draft Murray and just grab the unprotected goalie from the Pens.
Gonna be a fun HF year for Pens fans. Luongo2.0?
If Rutherford expects LV to accept compensation not to take Murray, he is crazy. If he frames it as "we're buying out Fleury because we know otherwise you'll take Murray, but we'd give you a 2nd round pick if you save us the trouble buy promising not to take Murray so we can keep both without a buyout" I guess it could work. Vegas would get a 2nd for not taking a player who wouldn't be available to them if they refused the 2nd. At the same point, if you're Vegas wouldn't you try to play hard ball knowing the situation and ask for a big return? Expecting to be able to coerce them to help you out in such a massive way for a paltry late 2nd seems a bit optimistic.
Pittsburgh's worst case scenario is that they have to buyout MA Fleury for a 2M penalty+roughly 1M replacement cost for a total 3M cap burden for four seasons. Their other worst case scenario is trading Murray for a huge return and keeping Fleury. They obviously aren't just going to leave Murray unprotected, they would trade him before doing that.
I don't think this contract was a blunder. It had to be done. If they move Fleury without a contract done with Murray, they hand Murray massive leverage. Also, now if Murray outplays Fleury, they won't be increasing Murray's bargaining position by playing him as the legit starter. Whether they decide to trade Murray or trade Fleury, getting Murray cost controlled was a necessary move.
Is anybody else getting really twisted up with both these goalies being named MURRAY AND FLEURY?