Which is why Murray signed the deal that takes him right to UFA status.
He knows the Pens will have to choose.
Funny thing is, given that it may cost a little retention to move Fleury, I'm not sure there's much of a cap difference between moving Fleury or Murray. And, the team may want a better backup short term if they keep Murray. 2M at most, of course, with no retention or costlier backup.
That said, the return for Murray would be a lot more.
For the Pens, this is about the next 3-4 years. Fleury is the sentimental favorite of the organization.
All things being equal, the better hockey decision for the next 3-4 years is to move Murray.
I do NOT think all things are equal, but unless Murray AGAIN gives them overwhelming evidence of that (i.e., deep run or Fleury implodes), I'm not convinced it's Fleury who gets traded.
This makes me sick . . .
What if they traded Murray for a king's ransom instead.
Sure, if Murray backstops a deep run or Fleury implodes, one way or another, they'll move Fleury. But, what if both goalies are equal in the playoffs? The organization loves Fleury personally. Murray gets a monster return. In this scenario, I could see Rutherford voluntarily or being pushed into accepting that the Pens would've won the cup last season with Fleury if he hadn't gotten a concussion . . . and then moving Murray.