You are smoking if you think KK is playing bad like Danault.Nah they're both just as bad.
we're not watching the same games then,KK struggled some games but hes been much better then Danault since the bubbleNah they're both just as bad.
You're letting your hatred blind you.we're not watching the same games then,KK struggled some games but hes been much better then Danault since the bubble
The most awful thing about that is that Bergevin still offered him an anchor contract for us.
You're letting your hatred blind you.
I personally don't really care either way...this whole team is a trainwreck... starting by our abysmal leadership core.
Blamming a single player when your leadership group and your superstar has given up up on the team is a bad joke
The leadership group hasn't changed. Everything else has...i wonder where the problem lies...
When i said that early on all the inbreds piled on me...
Now we're stuggling in the exact same manner we have since over the last few years.
Same leaders.
I meant the players but one could argue that the coaching staff is also part of the problem.When you say leadership group are you talking about management and coaches, or Weber, Petry, Gallagher, Price, Danault as leaders.
Gallagher contract will be an anchor next year and that's the start of his new deal lmao.Right now the Gallagher contract is looking like an anchor contract, while the Petry and Anderson ones aren't.
But this is only after 14 games. By the end of the year, things could be reversed. Then after the playoffs a whole different situation...
I can see the difficult situation he was in. If Suzuki and KK don't take steps immediately, and you wait until the last minute to sign Danault, and Danault has a 50 point pace season, maybe he bolts as a UFA.
Right now, I'm just really happy with the Petry, Anderson, and Toffoli contracts. The Gallagher contract could be a major issue when Gally is 33 and 34 years old - or sooner. And, that Danault didn't sign the big deal for now is a blessing that I'll be happy about. We know MB has signed players to good and bad contracts in the past. I expect both more good and more bad contracts to come. That's really the way with most GM's.
Which 5M? He is at 3M..
Also Right now Danault has way less icetime than Suzuki and Kotkaniemi. Do you wan both Suzuki/KK at 20+ min each?
Yes but when you have been playing poorly for most of the season and you are out sucking the suckage team...thats pretty bad. If the bar is so low, he should be able to easily go over it. Its his turn to lead the team. The kids did it for the first dozen games. So its even more of a reason for his poor play to be a problem. When the kids aren't playing as great as they were, the VETS are the ones that have to show up and play harder, setting an example. He is setting an example, but its not a good one.He can play better for sure but during this 4 game slump, Suzuki and KK are even worse IMO.
Anyways the point is that the entire team is underperforming.
Karma! He declined $5M AAV cause he thought he was more offensive than he actually is. This is on him, not the Habs management. We gave him a solid offer. Danault has to realize he is a Guy Carbonneau and not Saku Koivu. There is nothing to be ashamed about being a Carbonneau type.
We spoiled him cause our center depth was rotten (before Suzuki and KK) and then Danault grew and became a good 2 way center playing top line minutes. When Suzuki and KK started growing and we made some ice time and usage changes, he got upset. Grow up Danault! We want you to be a Habs but you got to come to grips with your role
Actually Weber put that one in. And, own goal was 100% Weber's fault.
Sorry mate, i will change the scoring , Goal Danault, first assist to weber....lol. Though come on, weber might have passed, but it takes a bloody good first line center scoring touch to have that one in the net
So little sense of humor... the whole post was a joke...Aimed at highlighting our self proclaimed first line center , the great danault.Weber shot it off Danault. Once it hit Danault, it went back in Weber's direction, hit Weber's stick and then went in.
I suppose you could give a 6th assist to Danault in your imaginary stat sheet. But the goal would be to Weber.
I meant the players but one could argue that the coaching staff is also part of the problem.
Switch Danault with Evans. Simple as that.
Gallagher contract will be an anchor next year and that's the start of his new deal lmao.
says youYou're an extremely upbeat poster. It's refreshing...
No, not really.
Please stop comparing Danault to Carbo. It is embarrassing for you.Karma! He declined $5M AAV cause he thought he was more offensive than he actually is. This is on him, not the Habs management. We gave him a solid offer. Danault has to realize he is a Guy Carbonneau and not Saku Koivu. There is nothing to be ashamed about being a Carbonneau type.
We spoiled him cause our center depth was rotten (before Suzuki and KK) and then Danault grew and became a good 2 way center playing top line minutes. When Suzuki and KK started growing and we made some ice time and usage changes, he got upset. Grow up Danault! We want you to be a Habs but you got to come to grips with your role
Why? Evans is faster, creates chances every shift from what i have seen. And is defensively just as effective as Danault this year. In fact i think Evans is a little snake bit and will start scoring goals. He looks like a player that wants goals, unlike Danault, who seems afraid of them. And I have watched every minute of habs games this year. And the last 2 years also. Have you , with your one line statement? Why not switch them Scriptor? Please explain.No, not really.