monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"
Player Discussion - Phillip Danault: What's My Line Edition | Page 4 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
  • Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

Player Discussion Phillip Danault: What's My Line Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
Another great performance from the 6 million dollar baby !

Can't shoot, can't pass, hands of stone and now he can't defend anymore...

Useless prick.
He makes 3m which was a f***ing discount for his services the last two seasons and he's certainly not the reason we lost tonight but go on with your gratuitous hatred.
 
He makes 3m which was a f***ing discount for his services the last two seasons and he's certainly not the reason we lost tonight but go on with your gratuitous hatred.

He's making 3,083 smart ass, I'm talking about the fact that he refused a 5M contract.
He cost at least one goal tonight and can't do anything offensively.

"...gratuitous hatred." Did you watch the game ? He was putrid again tonight.
 
He's making 3,083 smart ass, I'm talking about the fact that he refused a 5M contract.
He cost at least one goal tonight and can't do anything offensively.

"...gratuitous hatred." Did you watch the game ? He was putrid again tonight.
Chiarot was putrid. Price was bad. Edmonston was bad. Danault was not why we lost tonight.

And just for fun look at where Danault takes his face-offs and which lines he plays against, and reflect on who else on the team could do that right now.
 
Chiarot was putrid. Price was bad. Edmonston was bad. Danault was not why we lost tonight.

And just for fun look at where Danault takes his face-offs and which lines he plays against, and reflect on who else on the team could do that right now.

Yes, they were bad too, but it's Danault's thread, so we are talking about him only.

Toronto has two pretty good lines, one with Marner and Matt and one with Tavares and Nylander, which means that another Habs C was playing against one of these two lines and he did not look as bad as Danault...

He was our worst C again tonight, since last year's playoffs he's outplayed by kids, it's shameful.
 
Chiarot was putrid. Price was bad. Edmonston was bad. Danault was not why we lost tonight.

And just for fun look at where Danault takes his face-offs and which lines he plays against, and reflect on who else on the team could do that right now.
Awful turnover on the first leafs goal and a pathetic, low effort line change on the 3rd. Not to mention however many other turnovers he made. The guy doesn’t even hustle anymore, a complete passenger.

he’s not shutting anything down right now, looks like a lazy, shell of his former self. I’d send him a wake up call and make him spend a night in the press box. Maybe then he’ll start giving a shit again.

I don’t understand the reason to defend a guy that is so clearly dogging it out there on the ice
 
Chiarot was putrid. Price was bad. Edmonston was bad. Danault was not why we lost tonight.

And just for fun look at where Danault takes his face-offs and which lines he plays against, and reflect on who else on the team could do that right now.
''Danault was not the reason we lost tonight''

Except the 10 turn overs a period , 33% of faceoff win tonight While suzuki is at 53.3% , Kotkaniemi 43% and Evans 75%.

Do you even watch the game , what a terrible take.

You probably saw him with 1 of his 4 faceoff tonight and say '' he played a pretty good game overall''.
 
Chiarot was putrid. Price was bad. Edmonston was bad. Danault was not why we lost tonight.

Does a player have to be the worst player of the game in order to discuss his play? Seems weird that in the Danault thread, the analysis of his play is “Chiarot was putrid”. I really see no relevance. Go talk about Chiarot in his thread.
 
He's bought his ticket out of town, good riddance. He's a third line center that's been blessed by the coach playing him with the teams best wingers over the past 2 years. He can't create his own offence and his lack of O-zone skills along with lackadaisical defensive zone play lately is actively costing the team games now.
 
Awful turnover on the first leafs goal and a pathetic, low effort line change on the 3rd. Not to mention however many other turnovers he made. The guy doesn’t even hustle anymore, a complete passenger.

he’s not shutting anything down right now, looks like a lazy, shell of his former self. I’d send him a wake up call and make him spend a night in the press box. Maybe then he’ll start giving a shit again.

I don’t understand the reason to defend a guy that is so clearly dogging it out there on the ice

Was it Danault and Gallagher going off on a change? I just remember seeing Tatar shaking his head at the end there (though to be fair it seemed like a 3v3 at the goal). Still, a bad change when the puck is going into your zone.

That first goal was just pathetic by all four players, hope to never see that combo on a 4v4 again
 
Was it Danault and Gallagher going off on a change? I just remember seeing Tatar shaking his head at the end there (though to be fair it seemed like a 3v3 at the goal). Still, a bad change when the puck is going into your zone.

That first goal was just pathetic by all four players, hope to never see that combo on a 4v4 again

That 3rd goal was a 3 on 2 because of a lazy change. Danault was past centre ice before 2 out of the 3 Leafs players involved on that play, but he glided back for a change and the Habs never recovered.

 
Last edited:
That 3rd goal was a 3 on 2 because of a lazy change. Danault was past centre ice before 2 out of the 3 Leafs players involved on that play, but he glided back for a change and the Habs never recovered.


Plus he's the reason why the Leafs got possession lmao. Real Selke center.
 
That 3rd goal was a 3 on 2 because of a lazy change. Danault was past centre ice before 2 out of the 3 Leafs players involved on that play, but he glided back for a change and the Habs never recovered.



Thanks! Yeah wow that's an awful change
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top
-->->