habdynasty
Registered User
- May 26, 2008
- 7,902
- 3,637
And he is hard to play with. . As a winger. You want the puck on tape to rush the net. Danault is totally a liability offensively. And not a good playmaker for his linemateGood thing he’s hard to play against.
I said before that we couldn't move Danault because if we want to make the POs then we can't move such a piece. I assumed he would still be a decent player though, he looks terrible and hasn't scored in about 20 games. Move this guy already.
Anyone over 21, including the management.I still love this player. We need to do what we can to surround him with talent. We need Tom Wilson on this team. I think he would fit perfectly with PD.
Who can we give up guys? We need a rebuild bad.
Move him at his lowest value?
hard pass
Man, you guys really have an ax to grind against this guy because he leads the team in first assists at even strength...And he is hard to play with. . As a winger. You want the puck on tape to rush the net. Danault is totally a liability offensively. And not a good playmaker for his linemate
This has to be the reason why people crap on him all the time, he's just the definition of unspectacular...Tbnk il etait pourri a soir
I dont crap on him all the time i think hes looked awful this entire season . Im a fan of his but theres no chance he should be playing 21 minutes like what??This has to be the reason why people crap on him all the time, he's just the definition of unspectacular...
But the numbers are always there to back him up...
This has to be the reason why people crap on him all the time, he's just the definition of unspectacular...
But the numbers are always there to back him up...
I dont crap on him all the time i think hes looked awful this entire season . Im a fan of his but theres no chance he should be playing 21 minutes like what??
He's playing so many minutes because the youngsters just can't take over.
The kids struggle with lesser opposition, you think they'll do better with harder opposition?They haven't given the kids that chance though.
The kids struggle with lesser opposition, you think they'll do better with harder opposition?
Could you image the solid rebuild we could make? Montreal always had the assets to rebuild but not to compete. Tatar, Weber, Price, Byron, Danault, Gallagher and even Petry could fetch you 4-5 first rounder and a couple of second. If only Montreal could bid on the youth for once instead of staying on this perpentual never ending circle of suck. Of course you suck even more for 3-4 years but you are set for a decade after that if you draft wisely.At some point Montreal is going to have to play it's young players heavy minutes, for **** sakes what's the worst that can happen? Poor Philip danault wouldn't want to cut his ice time to develop the literal future of the franchise and 2 best C prospects we've had in 20 years. Smh it's like clockwork with this team it's embarassing to be a fan of this franchise sometimes
These are numbers at even strength from tonight's game:I think they would do better than Danault
IMO I'll get Pageau money ~5M$.Very curious to what Danault's next contract will look like. He's only scored 1 goal (an empty netter) in the last 35 games. Those types of players don't get paid 5 million.