Phillip Broberg

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.

Oilslick941611

Registered User
Jul 4, 2006
17,013
17,892
Ottawa
From all the reading I did. My understanding is he wanted 1.8 million. Oilers held firm at a number below a million 2 years. I actually don't even think it was 900k.

Armstrong saw an opportunity to help 2 young players who were not going to get paid. It was impressive and I know Oiler fans feel targeted

At the end of the day it is a business.
Oilers number was 1.2m for Broberg.


Not every oiler felt target, i sure didnt. Offersheets happen. Oiler fans werent upset when they offersheeted Penner or Vanek.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrisLetAngry

KrisLetAngry

MrJukeBoy
Dec 20, 2013
19,192
5,400
Saskatchewan
Oilers number was 1.2m for Broberg.


Not every oiler felt target, i sure didnt. Offersheets happen. Oiler fans werent upset when they offersheeted Penner or Vanek.
I won't dispute your number.

I see his Agent came out and said 2 years 1.1 million.

I wonder if the Oilers did one year if the offersheet never happened.

At the end of the day Oilers got some picks.

Got Ty Emberson
Got 2 3rds and a 2nd
Got Podzlinkin

Lost a 3rd and 4th and Ceci
Broberg and Holloway.

it's not like you guys weren't compensated atleast. Future draft picks to trade at the deadline for a top 4 D.
 

EdmFlyersfan

Registered User
Feb 20, 2007
4,947
3,301
Edmonton
mcdavid should throw a tantrum in the front office next time instead of the locker room

To be fair to management, I bet if both of them were apart of McDavid's inner circle they would have been signed as a priority...you would be fooling yourself if McD and Drai had no input as to what type of roster they wanted.
 

dirtydanglez

Registered User
Oct 30, 2022
5,296
5,358
To be fair to management, I bet if both of them were apart of McDavid's inner circle they would have been signed as a priority...you would be fooling yourself if McD and Drai had no input as to what type of roster they wanted.
i get the sense this was strictly a money move, not that they werent happy with the player
 

Cup or Bust

Registered User
Oct 17, 2017
4,433
3,981
The real unfortunate part is both Broberg and Holloway failed to establish themselves until very late into their contracts and only for short sample sizes. Some of that was due to injuries and maybe a lack of opportunity in some instances but in reality when they did play they really were not able to grab hold of a spot. They certainly showed potential though. The first flashes of Broberg really asserting himself was in the playoffs, before that his play ranged from average to at times mediocre in the NHL. A person could say the Oilers maybe didn't give him enough opportunity etc. but in reality the Oilers depth positions were not tough competition and they struggled to even make an impact versus average depth players at times.

Broberg appears to be a good potential 2-way d-man that does need some offensive opportunity to really get full value from his play and he was not going to get much of that in Edmonton to justify a 4.6 million dollar contract, at least not this season. St. Louis had the roster spots available and the ability to take a risk with these contracts that most Cup contending teams would not likely match. It was just a really good situation for St. Louis to take advantage of and if it works out well that is good but I think the Oilers will be fine and they can hopefully acquire a good fit at the deadline. Of course it would have been most ideal to keep them at reasonable contracts.
 
Last edited:

Oilslick941611

Registered User
Jul 4, 2006
17,013
17,892
Ottawa
i get the sense this was strictly a money move, not that they werent happy with the player
Also Broberg being unhappy with the organization. Remember Oilers would have been playing him on his offside and he mentioned he didn't like that and he had asked for a trade the previous season.

Its not black and white that oilers lost him because they were caught unprepped, Broberg's agent was playing offersheet all along, the surprise was 4.6 million.
 

JPT

Registered User
Jul 4, 2024
811
1,632
Yah, but this is a message board.

If you’re gonna give it, you’re gonna get it.

Look up Artemi Panarin post history, its 15 pages of oiler bashing.

At some point the barbs come back.


Didn’t see you in the oiler board last night, or the game before that… i wonder why
I get that's what some people are going to do, and I get what they're using for flimsy justification. My point is that it is a flimsy justification to do something they consider wrong otherwise. You may or may not be joining in. I don't know, nor do I really care tbh. It's stupid regardless.
 

Oilslick941611

Registered User
Jul 4, 2006
17,013
17,892
Ottawa
The real unfortunate part is both Broberg and Holloway failed to establish themselves until very late into their contracts and only for short sample sizes. Some of that was due to injuries and maybe a lack of opportunity in some instances but in reality when they did play they really were not able to grab hold of a spot. They certainly showed potential though. The first flashes of Broberg really asserting himself was in the playoffs, before that his play ranged from average to at times mediocre in the NHL. A person could say the Oilers maybe didn't give him enough opportunity etc. but in reality the Oilers depth positions were not tough competition and they struggled to even make an impact versus average depth players at times. Broberg appears to be a good potential 2-way d-man that does need some offensive opportunity to really get full value from his play and he was not going to get much of that in Edmonton to justify a 4.6 million dollar contract, at least not this season. St. Louis had the roster spots available and the ability to take a risk with these contracts that most Cup contending teams would not likely match. It was just a really good situation for St. Louis to take advantage of and if it works out well that is good but I think the Oilers will be fine and they can hopefully acquire a good fit at the deadline. Of course it would have been most ideal to keep them at reasonable contracts.
Big question mark on Broberg was durability and his ability to play well for more than 13 games. He never impressed in any oiler camp and didn't do very well in the AHL until last season. Im sure the Oilers would love to have kept him but there was nothing to show he was worth a 4.6 investment. Especially after being burned by short sample size masters like Yamamoto.
 

JPT

Registered User
Jul 4, 2024
811
1,632
Some things never change, right? Lol

I must admit I do find the Canadian fan bases sniping each other pretty amusing, but the only people that can badmouth St. Louis are other St. Louisans dammit!

I guess it was always gonna be a contentious issue considering the circumstances, but hope things work out for both fan bases and we can all have a good laugh about it in a couple of years.
If yall would stop cutting your bagels like maniacs maybe we would stop judging you.
 

Three On Zero

HF Designated Parking Instructor
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2012
32,368
31,297
If yall would stop cutting your bagels like maniacs maybe we would stop judging you.
IMG_6064.jpeg
 

Slats432

Registered User
Jun 2, 2002
15,342
3,754
hockeypedia.com
Big question mark on Broberg was durability and his ability to play well for more than 13 games. He never impressed in any oiler camp and didn't do very well in the AHL until last season. Im sure the Oilers would love to have kept him but there was nothing to show he was worth a 4.6 investment. Especially after being burned by short sample size masters like Yamamoto.
This is fairly accurate. Last year he was pretty penciled in to the lineup and did nothing to seize that opportunity. If it knocks now and he takes it, good for him. There was no way he was at the point of paying him $4.6 which was never earned. Blues are going to pay him for two years so they can re-sign him and pay him what he is worth then. They had to get his rights first, and that for them is mission accomplished.

I am not upset the Oilers didn't match. Holloway on the other hand.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oilslick941611

PocketNines

Cutter's Way
Apr 29, 2004
13,824
5,894
Badlands
Some Oiler fans are salty, and I surely will continue to have schadenfreude for the Blues. But not salty about Broberg. I agree with what the Oilers did on Broberg.
I am not complaining about the salt or adding to it, but observing it. I am much much more affirmatively advocating for food pics once the bagel was posted. Like someone could post pizza next
 

Oilslick941611

Registered User
Jul 4, 2006
17,013
17,892
Ottawa
This is fairly accurate. Last year he was pretty penciled in to the lineup and did nothing to seize that opportunity. If it knocks now and he takes it, good for him. There was no way he was at the point of paying him $4.6 which was never earned. Blues are going to pay him for two years so they can re-sign him and pay him what he is worth then. They had to get his rights first, and that for them is mission accomplished.

I am not upset the Oilers didn't match. Holloway on the other hand.....
I like Holloway, i have a game worn Bakersfield jersey of his, but we effectively and cheaply replaced him with Podz.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad