JojoTheWhale
"You should keep it." -- Striiker
- May 22, 2008
- 36,007
- 111,244
No
But boy did I think about it
I'd add to it. Shouldn't require any thought unless you think the Eagles need to reload. And then it's a no because the org isn't in a place to make the trade. The value is more than fine by any reasonable measure.
The closest comp you'll find was (Khalil Mack + 2 + 6) returned (1 + 6 + future 1 + future 3). Mack was 27 and needed to be paid. Parsons is about to be 24, has 2 full rookie scale years left and if you wanted to say he's clearly a better player so far, I can't say you're wrong. Parsons is a better asset on almost every axis.
Parsons should be the most valuable defensive asset in the league. And I think probably the most valuable non-QB, but I'd have to dig into WR contracts to confirm.
Last edited: