litflyersfan
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2008
- 2,187
- 834
A 5 year $260 million contract?Lamar Jackson and the Ravens...
Yup. There’s a reason why teams don’t usually have starting CBs in their 30s. And Cox is no spring chicken either.Want to point someone out...where the f*** has Josh Sweat been????????? Cox? Davis? The LB's ....Slay... Bradberry???? These are the names that should be mentioned
This is not a D that wins a playoff game, let alone a Superbowl.
It’s not gonna be an easy fix either, there are a lot of holes to fill.
After a prove it year. After several good years on a rookie deal.A 5 year $260 million contract?
So did I. He still has and shows tons of talent. I'm so glad the 49ers didn't take him and took Lance.
But exactly right, no hope in Chicago.
I mean, they still paid him. I’m talking about a team that says no to those 50 million + a year contracts and says bye to the playerAfter a prove it year. After several good years on a rookie deal.
@JojoTheWhale
What was that whole thing about how insulting it was before the season to say the Cowboys could likely win the division?
Sadly a couple days before the Super Bowl when you cash them at the cage.I'm sitting here trying to calculate if/when I want to sell the Dak MVP futures I bought a month ago. I knew I should have gone harder on it, damn it.
Bottom 7 in takeaways. It's a problem.The D isn’t the biggest issue. It wouldn’t be so bad if we scored but we haven’t.
Yup. There’s a reason why teams don’t usually have starting CBs in their 30s.
Fair enough. I would have liked a more conservative approach, but rock and a dark place like you said.I mean, they still paid him. I’m talking about a team that says no to those 50 million + a year contracts and says bye to the player