paulmm3
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2014
- 1,231
- 709
Our local triple A baseball team is the Bees. So probably not that. I'm still on Utah Pioneers.
That signature is terribleThis has to be the least useful press release of all time.
There are like 40 people in that section of Wyoming. Wyo is like Colorado’s Canada, one tenth the population, lives bunched up on the Southern Border, dominated culturally.Park City, Provo and Ogden are all roughly 45 minutes from SLC and Vegas is about 5.5 hours. On top of that, you draw in fans from southern Idaho and southern Wyoming.
This is the best name I've heard so far IMO.Our local triple A baseball team is the Bees. So probably not that. I'm still on Utah Pioneers.
Yep. Fan disgust is very different than apathy.IMO the only "unconventional" part is the apparent 2-step process for transferring the team. The fact that the Coyotes will "exist in limbo" is irrelevant until/unless a new team lands in the Phoenix area. If a team comes back, it could be the Coyotes. Or the Cactus Wrens. Or the Armadillos. Or whatever. And, it could have the same colors or completely new ones. Whatever the next owner wants.
The WashingtonRedskinsFootball TeamCommanders, a longtime staple of the NFL, finally buckled under Dan Snyder's ownership. A franchise with a sellout streak dating back to 1968, that once had a season ticket waiting list at least well into the 5 digits (6 digits if you believed the team), saw that sellout streak finally end (which for years it was being propped up, much like Nebraska's football sellout streak has been) and that waiting list dropped to 0.
That's not because Washington won't support an NFL team. It's that Washington won't support an NFL team run by a narcissistic asshat that lets the team plummet toward the bottom of the league and his only concern is how can I squeeze more money out of everyone else for my own enrichment? If Washington responded like that, it's naive for anyone to think far less established markets with far less established teams would respond better.
I completely understand it now thanks to the Red Sox ownership over the last 5ish years. No way I want my dollars going to them as a reward for the nonsense they've been pulling.Yep. Fan disgust is very different than apathy.
Anyone remember how things were for the Hawks before Dollar Bill died.
A would have to be escrowed in some way so that he can't do B, which leaves him with trying to do C, and then the BoG bet is he's never able to do it.As I understand, Meruelo's potential second swing at this would be considered an expansion.
Doesn't that mean there are three considerations here?
A) The billion he gets goes back into an expansion fee so it's not free profit; or
B) He walks away never intending to invest in the NHL and keeps the money; or
C) He gets an arena deal but the BoG or owners (I forget who holds the voting power) nix the expansion because they don't want history repeating especially with this owner in this market?
Then I'm surprised they had money for a word processor program, and it wasn't just scrawled on the back of a napkin at McDonald's.So the first thing that sticks out to me here is the cursor on the page, meaning this press release was produced as a screenshot of an active word processor document.
You have to wonder if software subscriptions to unlock the "export" feature were simply outside of the budget.
He'll probably use it to greenmail the NHL in the future.A would have to be escrowed in some way so that he can't do B, which leaves him with trying to do C, and then the BoG bet is he's never able to do it.
But this seems like such a messy way to draft a deal, and it would be much more simple if ....... wait, I'm talking about the NHL here. Never mind, this makes complete sense.
Then I'm surprised they had money for a word processor program, and it wasn't just scrawled on the back of a napkin at McDonald's.
To be fair, most name proposals are poor attempts at being funnyThis is the best name I've heard so far IMO.
Meh, sounds like a minor league team. I would rather them just be the Utah Coyotes/Salt Lake Coyotes. It sounds like the league is leaving the door open for Arizona to return once they figure out how to get an arena built, so maybe they'll save the Coyotes name for them?the Utah Sting sounds cool
So the league is allegedly buying the coyotes for 1 billion, then turning around and flipping to Utah for 1.2 billion? In what fking world is the yotes worth 1 billion let alone 1.2. Wtf am I missing???
Didn't Ottawa just sell for a lot less?
So the league is allegedly buying the coyotes for 1 billion, then turning around and flipping to Utah for 1.2 billion? In what fking world is the yotes worth 1 billion let alone 1.2. Wtf am I missing???
Didn't Ottawa just sell for a lot less?
The June land auction is gonna reveal a lot about how serious/unserious Meruelo is. If he doesn't bid, he will look like a giant asshole that pocketed the 1bil and was a giant snake oil salesman. If he bids, he's serious about bringing an arena. That said, the fact that he seemingly didn't seem to plan much ahead of moving out of Mullet makes me think he's an unserious owner.As I understand, Meruelo's potential second swing at this would be considered an expansion.
Doesn't that mean there are three considerations here?
A) The billion he gets goes back into an expansion fee so it's not free profit; or
B) He walks away never intending to invest in the NHL and keeps the money; or
C) He gets an arena deal but the BoG or owners (I forget who holds the voting power) nix the expansion because they don't want history repeating especially with this owner in this market?
He doesnt, just full of crap, nothing to see here.??? How do you know no one wants to play there?
Coyotes fans, I'm so sorry for the news. Losing a team blows. You deserved better from team ownership since the very start. I've always liked the Coyotes.
As for a team name, it should be the Utah Phoenix. A firebird makes a crazy cool logo, and it's a great reference to the team originally being the Phoenix Coyotes.