Next weekWhen do you think we will hear more.
Why? The Coyotes playing in Phoenix doesn’t have any effect on the Leafs, or any other team’s performance. Why should fans be happy?
Let's distinguish a lot of stuff in this sentence.
Did the Coyotes cost the league money? Yeah, they did. At least $112 million.
Did the league get some of it back? Reportedly yes. Maybe not all of it. Doesn't matter; part of the "cost" was the league protecting its interests re: ownership and relocation when a team goes into bankruptcy. That was worth every penny spent.
Did it "cost the players money?" No, they got every contractually obligated penny (pursuant to the terms of the CBA) they were due.
Did it cost the players potential money? Sure. But I'm sure that can be said about a number of teams that don't do everything to maximize revenues / take actions to cause revenues to fall short of where they "should" be.
Do the players have any claim to that lost money? NO. The players have no "right to all the possible money they can get" which somehow implies some "right to force teams to maximize revenues for the players' benefit." Just like the players have no right to force a team to play in any location, be competitive to whatever level, ... anything that has to do with how a team operates beyond whatever rights the league grants the NHLPA.
Owe money to the league? Sure, and that will happen. The league will make sure it gets repaid whatever it's currently owed.
To the players, other teams, for "lost money" or "inability to spend more money?"
I Googled HRR and the first thing that popped up:Reduction in HRR.
I'm pretty sure I didn't really prove it, and that I could further elaborate on it to show that no matter what some team is always costing the league and the players money in some way, especially since high-revenue teams are perfectly content with lower HRR since it means more profit for them, but ... OK, whatever.Thanks, you proved my point.
I like your posts Ted but let's let this one go. Southern bashing is one thing. An owner stiffing people on bills is a reputational risk for the league and the other owners. Merulo is a scam artist and his behaviour makes the NHL look like a garage league.I'm pretty sure I didn't really prove it, and that I could further elaborate on it to show that no matter what some team is always costing the league and the players money in some way, especially since high-revenue teams are perfectly content with lower HRR since it means more profit for them, but ... OK, whatever.
Let's kill this idea right here. There's not going to be a dispersal draft. Smyth and SLC aren't paying $1.3 billion for the rights to a franchise that can be relocated, then watch young guys like Clayton Keller, Mattias Maccelli, Logan Cooley, Sean Durzi, Dylan Kuenther, et. al. get shipped out to whoever wants to pluck them, then have to rebuild a roster from whatever scraps the rest of the league is leaving them. Even an attempt to do some hybrid Minnesota / San Jose thing from 1991 isn't happening, because the rest of the teams in the league aren't going to be told "pick from whatever scraps SLC doesn't want" and "now expose some guys that will make SLC better."A Coyotes dispersal draft
What's to let go? Meruelo may be a total douchebag and the NHL may have had to pony up money to cover his ass, and it might have lost money on saving the team back in 2009-12, but it's going to recoup money lent to Meruelo in any sale one way or another. I ... pretty explicitly stated that.I like your posts Ted but let's let this one go. Southern bashing is one thing. An owner stiffing people on bills is a reputational risk for the league and the other owners. Merulo is a scam artist and his behaviour makes the NHL look like a garage league.
Having a team play in a college arena that seats a maximum of something like 4,600 people while the rest of the league is around 18,000 is an embarrassment in it's own right.I like your posts Ted but let's let this one go. Southern bashing is one thing. An owner stiffing people on bills is a reputational risk for the league and the other owners. Merulo is a scam artist and his behaviour makes the NHL look like a garage league.
Guenther??? I think Arizona would be better starting point then expansion
A million picks
Cooley.
Keller
Crouse.
Looks like they just posted the internal notes on what the gist of the official statement should be.
Which begs the question - why would Smith even want the Coyotes organization? With the Browns/Ravens organization there was ownership continuity, which isn't the case here. Moreover, taking on the Coyotes means taking on contracts Arizona absorbed to technically get to the floor, but will be problematic for Smith assuming he plans to try and build a contender in the short term.
I feel bad for the fans caught in the middle ... I like having a team in Phoenix and it sounds like the NHL does too ... why can't they go back to Glendale on a temporary basis until they sort out a new arena ? Is that bridge burned ?
Didn't they also dig up the whole river and fire it into the sun?That bridge is more than burned. Glendale doesn't want the Coyotes back at all. That bridge is burned, imploded, sunk into the river, and would take way too much effort to dredge.
I Googled HRR and the first thing that popped up:
The league is projected to bring in record revenues from the 2021-22 season, likely around $5.3 billion, if not higher, according to NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman when hockey-related revenue (HRR) is officially tabulated.
I think the billionaire-owned teams have been just fine.
I'm pretty sure I didn't really prove it, and that I could further elaborate on it to show that no matter what some team is always costing the league and the players money in some way, especially since high-revenue teams are perfectly content with lower HRR since it means more profit for them, but ... OK, whatever.
The cap has more than doubled over the last 20 years and is forecasted to go up another 10% over the next two years.Sure, but it's still cost them money. The league could be healthier with a larger salary cap, benefiting all teams
There are a lot of moving parts going on. But one thing that annoys me it the amount of hatred Frank Servalli is getting from some outlets in Arizona. The guy is a reporter and had 15+ years in the industry. He does not go unless he has the story 100%.
For those saying "he is a not an Arizona bear writer" The coyotes would have buried this so far down and hid it up to the moment they had to announce it. It came from out east--someone out east had enough and decided it was time for the discussion and decided to use Frank S as them outlet
Didn't they also dig up the whole river and fire it into the sun?
But surely you get why the players look at the money they lose to escrow, and then see a team playing in a minor league rink, and think what the f***?I'm pretty sure I didn't really prove it, and that I could further elaborate on it to show that no matter what some team is always costing the league and the players money in some way, especially since high-revenue teams are perfectly content with lower HRR since it means more profit for them, but ... OK, whatever.
Media will say stuff over the weekend. What I think has happened. The NHL asked for a plan B if the land deal fails or is delayed(is is a massive build) and the Arizona owners did not give them a plan BWhen do you think we will hear more.
You're coming off as kind of obtuse in this thread. You refuse any explanation given and simply conflate any concerns people might have with "excitement". Like, what do you want from people? Do posters need to couch any and all comments with "empathy" for Yotes fans? Do people need to be careful about what and how they say things for fear of hurting Arizona fans feelings? I don't get what your gripe is at this point.So, this doesn't explain why anyone should be excited that a team is leaving a market.