Per Friedman: Coyotes players told team moving to Utah starting next season (Mod warning post #50)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Legion34

Registered User
Jan 24, 2006
18,978
8,998
Yep. The mayor of the adjacent town trashes the project and the potential Utah owner is soliciting names.

Totally normal
 

Transplanted Caper

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2003
29,961
3,055
Meruelo getting an expansion team once an arena deal is confirmed and set up, while the "Coyotes" relocate to SLS is interesting and feels like it would solve several issues at once. The league is obviously very committed to Arizona, but at a certain point, regardless of the reasons, you can understand why they can't just keep playing the waiting game for things out of their control to fall into place.
 

Dr Pepper

Registered User
Dec 9, 2005
71,378
17,040
Sunny Etobicoke
Meruelo getting an expansion team once an arena deal is confirmed and set up, while the "Coyotes" relocate to SLS is interesting and feels like it would solve several issues at once. The league is obviously very committed to Arizona, but at a certain point, regardless of the reasons, you can understand why they can't just keep playing the waiting game for things out of their control to fall into place.

Makes me wonder why they didn't just do that two years ago, instead of stubbornly resorting to playing out of a glorified rec-center at ASU. Could've just shipped the Coyotes elsewhere, with the caveat that Arizona would be next in line for expansion once they got all their ducks in a row and finally figured out how to build an NHL-sized arena.

Now here we are two years later and it looks like the clock's about to strike 12.
 

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
27,141
16,030
Montreal, QC
If this is it for them the least they could do was at least give the fans a couple of home games to say goodbye, even if it's just temporary. Would be kind of crappy to just turn the key once the season is over with no announcement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Finlandia WOAT

Transplanted Caper

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2003
29,961
3,055
Makes me wonder why they didn't just do that two years ago, instead of stubbornly resorting to playing out of a glorified rec-center at ASU. Could've just shipped the Coyotes elsewhere, with the caveat that Arizona would be next in line for expansion once they got all their ducks in a row and finally figured out how to build an NHL-sized arena.

Now here we are two years later and it looks like the clock's about to strike 12.
Not that I disagree with the premise, but I suspect the 'Break in Case of Emergency' Salt Lake City glass is a relatively new development in terms of being able to turn it around in months.
 

viper0220

Registered User
Oct 10, 2008
8,934
4,080
Meruelo getting an expansion team once an arena deal is confirmed and set up, while the "Coyotes" relocate to SLS is interesting and feels like it would solve several issues at once. The league is obviously very committed to Arizona, but at a certain point, regardless of the reasons, you can understand why they can't just keep playing the waiting game for things out of their control to fall into place.

Would Meruelo pay the expansion fee?
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,704
50,702
Makes me wonder why they didn't just do that two years ago, instead of stubbornly resorting to playing out of a glorified rec-center at ASU. Could've just shipped the Coyotes elsewhere, with the caveat that Arizona would be next in line for expansion once they got all their ducks in a row and finally figured out how to build an NHL-sized arena.

Now here we are two years later and it looks like the clock's about to strike 12.

If they won the arena vote last May they would be 1-2 years away from having a new arena.
 
Last edited:

JKG33

Leafs & Kings
Oct 31, 2009
7,586
11,493
Winnipeg
Meruelo getting an expansion team once an arena deal is confirmed and set up, while the "Coyotes" relocate to SLS is interesting and feels like it would solve several issues at once. The league is obviously very committed to Arizona, but at a certain point, regardless of the reasons, you can understand why they can't just keep playing the waiting game for things out of their control to fall into place.
I've been thinking this for a while now too. Arizona is a valuable market and with a proper arena could work. But a college barn just ain't it for the big leagues.

Moving to SLC now, if they're ready for a pro hockey team, makes a lot of sense. Then Arizona can get an expansion team with Atlanta, Houston, and whoever #4 is (KC? QC?) when they have an arena ready.

I always thought it'd be Houston not SLC getting the cheaper relocation team, but this makes sense too
 

Transplanted Caper

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2003
29,961
3,055
How is that confirmed? Can he get an arena built?

Atlanta and Houston are big markets too, and if they can get an arena built while Meruelo can’t, then the NHL won’t come back.

A NHL team can’t play in Mullett Arena for ~5 years, it’s really not feasible.

How is what confirmed? I'm speaking to a hypothetical the article outlines. You move the team to Salt Lake City, now, Then see how the land auction unfolds, and if it falls into place, you start working towards an expansion deal for Arizona.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

JKG33

Leafs & Kings
Oct 31, 2009
7,586
11,493
Winnipeg
If they move and get it back in let's say 5 years, do they get to keep the history ala with endless up happening with the Ravens/Browns in the mid 90s?
I'd say that's a likely scenario. I mean they don't have much worthwhile NHL history as the Jets/Coyotes, but I'd imagine SLC would be looked at as an expansion team and Arizona would retain theirs much like the Browns
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,176
21,370
Toronto
I've been thinking this for a while now too. Arizona is a valuable market and with a proper arena could work. But a college barn just ain't it for the big leagues.

Moving to SLC now, if they're ready for a pro hockey team, makes a lot of sense. Then Arizona can get an expansion team with Atlanta, Houston, and whoever #4 is (KC? QC?) when they have an arena ready.

I always thought it'd be Houston not SLC getting the cheaper relocation team, but this makes sense too
Somehow the NHL having 36 teams while having arguably the smallest talent pool of the Big 4 leagues seems wrong.
 
Last edited:

JKG33

Leafs & Kings
Oct 31, 2009
7,586
11,493
Winnipeg
Somehow the NHL having 36 teams while having probably arguably the smallest talent pool of the Big 4 leagues seems wrong.
I don't know that they have the smallest talent pool. They're certainly more global than football.

But I'm thinking more in terms of a market share perspective. Winnipeg, Calgary, Edmonton, and Ottawa all have no buisness being in the "big leagues" if it weren't hockey. So as it stands the NHL only has 28 big league markets where the other 3 have 30+. From a market perspective it makes sense that they'd wanna get that number to 32 (or 31 depending if QC is involved).

I'm being generous with Montreal, Vancouver, and Columbus who all don't have other pro teams, but each sport has teams thatre "one offs" too
 

yianik

Registered User
Jun 30, 2009
11,123
6,673
All I know is whoever is a Yotes fan must be pretty hard core to put up with all of this, year after grinding year.
 

LPHabsFan

Registered User
Jul 14, 2003
2,784
1,529
Montreal
Visit site
If they move and get it back in let's say 5 years, do they get to keep the history ala with endless up happening with the Ravens/Browns in the mid 90s?
One problem. There's no actual history there to keep. Unless we're talking about bankruptcy, shitty owners, little fan interest, and screwing over municipalities.
 

93LEAFS

Registered User
Nov 7, 2009
34,176
21,370
Toronto
I don't know that they have the smallest talent pool. They're certainly more global than football.

But I'm thinking more in terms of a market share perspective. Winnipeg, Calgary, Edmonton, and Ottawa all have no buisness being in the "big leagues" if it weren't hockey. So as it stands the NHL only has 28 big league markets where the other 3 have 30+. From a market perspective it makes sense that they'd wanna get that number to 32 (or 31 depending if QC is involved)
I would think more people play Youth and High School football would be higher than the combined amount of people who play youth hockey. The United States is massive population-wise, and outside Russia and Canada, most of the other Hockey nations are quite small (Sweden, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Finland). Even then, Canada is about the size of California population wise. It's growing in some bigger markets like Germany, but the player base still isn't large. Due to how Football is funded, it is a way more accessible sport to play. Whereas people who go far in hockey are generally skating by like 4 or 5, and playing on expensive travel teams by like 8. It requires a unique skill set, whereas Basketball and Football require more freakish athletic ability that you can get a late start on if you have those attributes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
42,024
18,565
Mulberry Street
If they move and get it back in let's say 5 years, do they get to keep the history ala with endless up happening with the Ravens/Browns in the mid 90s?

NFL did that because of the Browns history. I.e. they had been a longtime NFL franchise and were a significant part of the leagues overall history. It's not the same with Phoenix.

I would think more people play Youth and High School football would be higher than the combined amount of people who play youth hockey. The United States is massive population-wise, and outside Russia and Canada, most of the other Hockey nations are quite small (Sweden, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Finland). Even then, Canada is about the size of California population wise. It's growing in some bigger markets like Germany, but the player base still isn't large. Due to how Football is funded, it is a way more accessible sport to play. Whereas people who go far in hockey are generally skating by like 4 or 5, and playing on expensive travel teams by like 8. It requires a unique skill set, whereas Basketball and Football require more freakish athletic ability that you can get a late start on if you have those attributes.

Yea, there's plenty of guys (dont have the stats but its probably the majority of players) who started playing football in 9th or 10th grade vs hockey where most guys start well before that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 93LEAFS

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
27,141
16,030
Montreal, QC
I don't know that they have the smallest talent pool. They're certainly more global than football.

But I'm thinking more in terms of a market share perspective. Winnipeg, Calgary, Edmonton, and Ottawa all have no buisness being in the "big leagues" if it weren't hockey. So as it stands the NHL only has 28 big league markets where the other 3 have 30+. From a market perspective it makes sense that they'd wanna get that number to 32 (or 31 depending if QC is involved).

I'm being generous with Montreal, Vancouver, and Columbus who all don't have other pro teams, but each sport has teams thatre "one offs" too

Except that Montreal and Vancouver would be multiple sports towns if they were located in the US based on the size of their market and metro pop (I know Montreal had the Expos but still). If we're going by size, Montreal would be a 4 team town for example if you compare it to American cities of its size.
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
192,896
43,439
There’s nothing that’s ever held the NHL back from retroactively acknowledging both iterations of the Jets as one franchise. The NBA did it with the Charlotte Hornets.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad