Meruelo getting an expansion team once an arena deal is confirmed and set up, while the "Coyotes" relocate to SLS is interesting and feels like it would solve several issues at once. The league is obviously very committed to Arizona, but at a certain point, regardless of the reasons, you can understand why they can't just keep playing the waiting game for things out of their control to fall into place.
Not that I disagree with the premise, but I suspect the 'Break in Case of Emergency' Salt Lake City glass is a relatively new development in terms of being able to turn it around in months.Makes me wonder why they didn't just do that two years ago, instead of stubbornly resorting to playing out of a glorified rec-center at ASU. Could've just shipped the Coyotes elsewhere, with the caveat that Arizona would be next in line for expansion once they got all their ducks in a row and finally figured out how to build an NHL-sized arena.
Now here we are two years later and it looks like the clock's about to strike 12.
Meruelo getting an expansion team once an arena deal is confirmed and set up, while the "Coyotes" relocate to SLS is interesting and feels like it would solve several issues at once. The league is obviously very committed to Arizona, but at a certain point, regardless of the reasons, you can understand why they can't just keep playing the waiting game for things out of their control to fall into place.
Makes me wonder why they didn't just do that two years ago, instead of stubbornly resorting to playing out of a glorified rec-center at ASU. Could've just shipped the Coyotes elsewhere, with the caveat that Arizona would be next in line for expansion once they got all their ducks in a row and finally figured out how to build an NHL-sized arena.
Now here we are two years later and it looks like the clock's about to strike 12.
I've been thinking this for a while now too. Arizona is a valuable market and with a proper arena could work. But a college barn just ain't it for the big leagues.Meruelo getting an expansion team once an arena deal is confirmed and set up, while the "Coyotes" relocate to SLS is interesting and feels like it would solve several issues at once. The league is obviously very committed to Arizona, but at a certain point, regardless of the reasons, you can understand why they can't just keep playing the waiting game for things out of their control to fall into place.
If they move and get it back in let's say 5 years, do they get to keep the history ala with endless up happening with the Ravens/Browns in the mid 90s?
How is that confirmed? Can he get an arena built?
Atlanta and Houston are big markets too, and if they can get an arena built while Meruelo can’t, then the NHL won’t come back.
A NHL team can’t play in Mullett Arena for ~5 years, it’s really not feasible.
I'd say that's a likely scenario. I mean they don't have much worthwhile NHL history as the Jets/Coyotes, but I'd imagine SLC would be looked at as an expansion team and Arizona would retain theirs much like the BrownsIf they move and get it back in let's say 5 years, do they get to keep the history ala with endless up happening with the Ravens/Browns in the mid 90s?
Somehow the NHL having 36 teams while having arguably the smallest talent pool of the Big 4 leagues seems wrong.I've been thinking this for a while now too. Arizona is a valuable market and with a proper arena could work. But a college barn just ain't it for the big leagues.
Moving to SLC now, if they're ready for a pro hockey team, makes a lot of sense. Then Arizona can get an expansion team with Atlanta, Houston, and whoever #4 is (KC? QC?) when they have an arena ready.
I always thought it'd be Houston not SLC getting the cheaper relocation team, but this makes sense too
I think it's a different situation where the Jets came back 15 years later because circumstances changed. Where the Arizona thing feels a lot more pre-plannedNO!
The NHL didn't do that for the Jets, they won't do that here.
I don't know that they have the smallest talent pool. They're certainly more global than football.Somehow the NHL having 36 teams while having probably arguably the smallest talent pool of the Big 4 leagues seems wrong.
One problem. There's no actual history there to keep. Unless we're talking about bankruptcy, shitty owners, little fan interest, and screwing over municipalities.If they move and get it back in let's say 5 years, do they get to keep the history ala with endless up happening with the Ravens/Browns in the mid 90s?
NO!
The NHL didn't do that for the Jets, they won't do that here.
I would think more people play Youth and High School football would be higher than the combined amount of people who play youth hockey. The United States is massive population-wise, and outside Russia and Canada, most of the other Hockey nations are quite small (Sweden, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Finland). Even then, Canada is about the size of California population wise. It's growing in some bigger markets like Germany, but the player base still isn't large. Due to how Football is funded, it is a way more accessible sport to play. Whereas people who go far in hockey are generally skating by like 4 or 5, and playing on expensive travel teams by like 8. It requires a unique skill set, whereas Basketball and Football require more freakish athletic ability that you can get a late start on if you have those attributes.I don't know that they have the smallest talent pool. They're certainly more global than football.
But I'm thinking more in terms of a market share perspective. Winnipeg, Calgary, Edmonton, and Ottawa all have no buisness being in the "big leagues" if it weren't hockey. So as it stands the NHL only has 28 big league markets where the other 3 have 30+. From a market perspective it makes sense that they'd wanna get that number to 32 (or 31 depending if QC is involved)
If they move and get it back in let's say 5 years, do they get to keep the history ala with endless up happening with the Ravens/Browns in the mid 90s?
I would think more people play Youth and High School football would be higher than the combined amount of people who play youth hockey. The United States is massive population-wise, and outside Russia and Canada, most of the other Hockey nations are quite small (Sweden, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Finland). Even then, Canada is about the size of California population wise. It's growing in some bigger markets like Germany, but the player base still isn't large. Due to how Football is funded, it is a way more accessible sport to play. Whereas people who go far in hockey are generally skating by like 4 or 5, and playing on expensive travel teams by like 8. It requires a unique skill set, whereas Basketball and Football require more freakish athletic ability that you can get a late start on if you have those attributes.
I don't know that they have the smallest talent pool. They're certainly more global than football.
But I'm thinking more in terms of a market share perspective. Winnipeg, Calgary, Edmonton, and Ottawa all have no buisness being in the "big leagues" if it weren't hockey. So as it stands the NHL only has 28 big league markets where the other 3 have 30+. From a market perspective it makes sense that they'd wanna get that number to 32 (or 31 depending if QC is involved).
I'm being generous with Montreal, Vancouver, and Columbus who all don't have other pro teams, but each sport has teams thatre "one offs" too