Yager was unlikely to make the team anyway. It's Mike Sullivan behind the bench. He wants a veteran PK'er who will take 70% D-zone starts, replacing Carter.I don't think it was a good trade at all. Converting cap space into futures is one thing. Blocking prospects at the NHL level for middling talent is quite another. Also, it is basically a contradiction to both want Yager in the NHL and like the Hayes acquisition. If Hayes was not here, Yager's chances would go up exponentially. Yeah yeah, I know: centers can play wing; Yager can beat someone else out if he is ready, yada yada yada...
We did well to get futures for Reilly Smith. We did really well in the Guentzel trade. That is the path we should follow, not the Hayes deal. Hayes has looked disinterested since leaving Philadelphia, and probably even before that. He does nothing for this team, except block the path to playing time for the likes of Yager, Ponomarev, Poulin et al.
We won't get anything for Hayes because he is middling. He does not move the need at all, and he probably was acquired because Mike Sullivan runs this franchise, not Kyle Dubas. OR, Dubas knows he has to do right by Sullivan, so he panders to him. But I seriously doubt that Hayes likes Sullivan and Quinn so much that he is going to go through walls for them and rebound with a career season.
The only redeeming quality about Hayes is that he does not have P-L Dubois' contract.
Dubas cares greatly about the depth in Wilkes, since he's a former AHL GM and scout for many years.The more I look at our team the more I wonder why we signed so many players.
Is Lizotte supposed to sit as 13th man. Did Puljujarvi not show he deserves to play?
We have no spots for any young players to really fight for.
I don't get it.
The more I look at our team the more I wonder why we signed so many players.
Is Lizotte supposed to sit as 13th man. Did Puljujarvi not show he deserves to play?
We have no spots for any young players to really fight for.
I don't get it.
I'll always have a soft spot for Geno being a trooper his whole career while being shafted for wingers.
It’s hard to build 2 super lines, but I agree that everybody new that comes gets the “let’s try him with Crosby” first and Malkin is an afterthought. I will say that it appears Crosby sacrificed the 1/2 wall spot for Geno. So there is that.I'll always have a soft spot for Geno being a trooper his whole career while being shafted for wingers.
Not always. When Sid was out, Malkin usually shined, even with harder matchups!But compared to Crosby there hasn’t been a huge difference. Sid’s line gets the harder match ups too.
It wasn't even just that. When Crosby had his set of wingers that he thrived with, anytime Malkin had a winger do well with him, they'd rip him off to drop down a struggling winger so they'd f*** up that line and then blame Malkin.It’s hard to build 2 super lines, but I agree that everybody new that comes gets the “let’s try him with Crosby” first and Malkin is an afterthought. I will say that it appears Crosby sacrificed the 1/2 wall spot for Geno. So there is that.
I don’t live in Pittsburgh but see the common trope of Malkin being a problem and good for nothing amongst casual fans. Makes me sick!
Not always. When Sid was out, Malkin usually shined, even with harder matchups!
Look at how long vs Crosby having Guentzel And Rust or Kunitz and Dupuis for the vast majority of his career.In terms of the wingers our rosters have had he hasn’t really been shafted.
He’s had Kessel, Neal. Had one of his better seasons with Hagelin & Hornqvist. He’s had Kunitz, Jake, Rust some of the time too.
We’ve never had a plethora of great wingers so maybe compared to other teams he hasn’t but those teams never had a Geno calibre player as their 2C.
But compared to Crosby there hasn’t been a huge difference. Sid’s line gets the harder match ups too.
And to this day the best production from Rust and Guentzel as Penguins were with Malkin facing top units.It’s hard to build 2 super lines, but I agree that everybody new that comes gets the “let’s try him with Crosby” first and Malkin is an afterthought. I will say that it appears Crosby sacrificed the 1/2 wall spot for Geno. So there is that.
I don’t live in Pittsburgh but see the common trope of Malkin being a problem and good for nothing amongst casual fans. Makes me sick!
Not always. When Sid was out, Malkin usually shined, even with harder matchups!
The General Manager...Kyle Dubas, Assistant to the General Manager
It rules because people just can't be like "my hero, superstar iron man athlete ______, actually melted their brains with pseudoscience and is scared that doctors are going to steal their blood while they're unconscious", they have some weird gobbledygook explanation for why superstar iron man athlete ______ won't take advantage of the best and most expensive medical care possible that they're not even paying for!"It's way better to avoid a major procedure."
It's not the Dark Ages and these guys sorta kinda have boatloads of money. Rubbing some dirt on it, crossing your fingers and fishing all Summer isn't going to fix a blowed-out knee.
You can also argue that most those players got better after leaving us and his biggest mistake was not getting rid of Sullivan.Ron Hextall’s Top 5 Blunders as Pittsburgh Penguins GM Revealed
Ron Hextall ‘s time as Penguins general manager was filled with some bright spots, but many blemishes. This article looks at his five worst moves as GM. Ron Hextall took over as Pittsburgh Penguins general manager on February 9 th, 2021....fanrecap.com
Pretty accurate.
refusing to fire the coach was the biggest. imoRon Hextall’s Top 5 Blunders as Pittsburgh Penguins GM Revealed
Ron Hextall ‘s time as Penguins general manager was filled with some bright spots, but many blemishes. This article looks at his five worst moves as GM. Ron Hextall took over as Pittsburgh Penguins general manager on February 9 th, 2021....fanrecap.com
Pretty accurate.
But Acciari is worse lolEssentially Malkin is about as swift as frozen molasses lodged in a glacier?
But Acciari is worse lol
Acciari's the poster child for a player who seemed like he had everything we needed in a bottom six player (physicality, grit, decent hands around the net, etc.) prior to arriving here, only for Sullivan to transform him into yet another one of our faceless, nothingburger dime a dozen 4th liners.That was the crazy one to me. He always seemed to play with great pace, elsewhere. Curious! Almost like he's been put in a really stupid position in a really stupid system, here. Or he just kinda sucks. Or both.
Yager was unlikely to make the team anyway. It's Mike Sullivan behind the bench. He wants a veteran PK'er who will take 70% D-zone starts, replacing Carter.
I never considered him making the team full-time a distinct possibility, so I'm not really worried about someone blocking him.
I just want picks if they're gonna spend a few years messing around, which they got in this trade.
Hayes isn't supposed to move the needle. There is no needle anymore. This team's lost all ambition. He's a filler while they maintain appearances. They're just waiting for Crosby to retire.
Acciari was awesome in TorontoDubas brought Acciari on as a depth player in a failed concept in Toronto, to a failed concept here.
It's the player.
Right up to where they were all negatives....Acciari was awesome in Toronto
Acciari scored the same number of goals in Toronto in only 23 games as he did in 55 games for Pittsburgh.Dubas brought Acciari on as a depth player in a failed concept in Toronto, to a failed concept here.
It's the player.
This seems to be based on absolutely nothing. He was a +2 during his Toronto stint. Given that his main role was defensive, that's pretty good.Right up to where they were all negatives....
Yeah my Toronto friend was excited for us and said we would like him. He said - there's your replacement for Tanev (though I didn't think that was a need).Acciari was awesome in Toronto