Just to emphasize the point more:
Petry: 22 games, 3 goals and 9 points, +4, -0.29% xGF%Rel, 21:35 TOI/game
Matheson: 4 games, 1 goal and 2 points, -2, +3.36% xGF%, 23:48 TOI/game
I fundamentally can't comprehend how someone can say that Petry hasn't been anywhere near as advertised while Matheson has been good. I can see saying Matheson has been good, albeit in a small sample size, but what is Petry possibly lacking with his play on the year overall?
This fanbase as a whole really bothers me sometimes with the whipping boys/golden boys they pick out. Petry had 8 penalty minutes in his first 3 games of the year and people just now non-stop say he's been a problem because of his penalties.