Josey Wales
Registered User
- May 16, 2022
- 3,556
- 1,331
Trade Targets: Let the bidding begin for Vancouver Canucks' Bo Horvat - Daily Faceoff don't know if this fits here or not !
It is cheaper but it's not being cheap... they should recruit and build and plant and grow and foster the youth players so they can play in the NHL... at ... whatever age they hit off...They shouldn't have done it in any case. This team is not a team that can afford to have multiple recovery projects on the roster, and certainly not fixer-uppers that cost over $2 million.
This was always one of the most logical outcomes to the team refusing to look internally for cheap solutions in the bottom 6, I'm not sure why people are surprised that it's an issue.
The thing is, he's always had warts (lack of vision, patience, ability to read plays or play to the pace of his linemates)- we've known that since his rookie year. Not only has he done nothing to improve in those areas - as you said he's actually regressed! At least in his first few seasons in Toronto he was scoring goals. He hasn't done that for us, ever.It’s downright bizarre to me that people are still insisting Kapanen isn’t terrible. I don’t know what happened with him, but he fell off a cliff about a year ago and looks like a shell of his former self. People stat watch to say he shouldn’t be healthy scratched based on “he has a few points”, but he’s been invisible at best for a huge majority of games in the last calendar year.
I was fine with the gamble with signing him to a 2 year deal last off-season, but it’s painfully obvious that it’s a bust already and they need to move on. If Kapanen returns to form after being traded, good for him. But as of right now, he’s not one of the Penguins 12 best forwards and he’s actively hurting them due to his cap hit.
JR's worst signing, meet Hextall's worst signing.The problem isn't that it's a 3.2 million penalty. It's a 5.1 million penalty because we are paying 1.9 million this year for JJ's buyout.
Couldn't agree more. It was an incredibly low risk move to not give him the QO with the number of other unqualified RFAs. You could have not QO'd him and then offered him a $2mil x 1yr.The screw up was qualifying Kapanen IMO, I think that decision directly resulted in them being screwed with the cap.
I don’t think they would have re-signed Kapanen had they known Heinen was coming back, but they couldn’t retract the qualifying offer at that point.
Honestly, if that's the worst we have to worry about, we are in good shape.JR's worst signing, meet Hextall's worst signing.
f***ing JR had to go trade back for him, such a dumb move considering we had the 15th pick that year!!!JR's worst signing, meet Hextall's worst signing.
I'm not a fan of players like Kap. I wouldn't have given up what JR did to get him in the first place and I wouldn't have qualified him this year.
Not liking Kap as a player and recognizing that Sullivan hasn't got the best out of him aren't mutually exclusive, though. A 40-ish point 3rd liner who can PK for $3.2M is not bad value. But he's regressed from the player he was in Toronto and his first year here for 2 years in a row now. I think a lot of that can be attributed to Sullivan.
Certainly Kap needs to take some responsibility for his play as well, but this is not an isolated incident where Sullivan has tried to square-peg-round-hole something. GCRu, Carter, E-Rod, McCann, JMFJ-Schultz...the list goes on and on.
Under a different coach, whether on this team or another, I think there is a role for Kapanen on an NHL team. It's just not going to be with Sullivan behind the bench. Typically, I'm against trading players away because the coach is misusing them. I think when that becomes the calculus a few too many times, you need to move the coach out first. In this case, though, Sullivan isn't going anywhere and Kap's not good enough to really fret over, so I think it's best to just move on however they can.
It’s not like JR would have drafted a good player or Sully would have given said player a chance.f***ing JR had to go trade back for him, such a dumb move considering we had the 15th pick that year!!!
it's jr. as long as we are willing to listen, jr will be willing to trade.What would we have that JR would reasonably be interested in for Horvat? I don't think the old bat's gonna bite on a Kapanen-Dumoulin for Horvat proposal.
They both are bad. It's moot now though that he's not in our top 12 best forwards and he costs 3.2 million dollars.I'm not a fan of players like Kap. I wouldn't have given up what JR did to get him in the first place and I wouldn't have qualified him this year.
Not liking Kap as a player and recognizing that Sullivan hasn't got the best out of him aren't mutually exclusive, though. A 40-ish point 3rd liner who can PK for $3.2M is not bad value. But he's regressed from the player he was in Toronto and his first year here for 2 years in a row now. I think a lot of that can be attributed to Sullivan.
Certainly Kap needs to take some responsibility for his play as well, but this is not an isolated incident where Sullivan has tried to square-peg-round-hole something. GCRu, Carter, E-Rod, McCann, JMFJ-Schultz...the list goes on and on.
Under a different coach, whether on this team or another, I think there is a role for Kapanen on an NHL team. It's just not going to be with Sullivan behind the bench. Typically, I'm against trading players away because the coach is misusing them. I think when that becomes the calculus a few too many times, you need to move the coach out first. In this case, though, Sullivan isn't going anywhere and Kap's not good enough to really fret over, so I think it's best to just move on however they can.
They both are bad. It's moot now though that he's not in our top 12 best forwards and he costs 3.2 million dollars.
When Kap goes to another team I won't be sour about it by any means. I'll be happy for him if he proves me wrong and succeeds. I will be happy in any scenario involving Kapanen leaving the Penguins.
I don't care for his hf value. Wrong tree mate. I just know he's capable of better and that this coach misused him and then didn't know how to fix it so he's now got the salary cap issue as his excuse.Making statements like this won't magically make Kapanen's trade value anything but negative.
Dude scored like 10 goals in his past 100 games, majority of those games were played with Malkin, in our top-6 or on our PP unit.
Skating really fast and hard does not make you worth 3.2 million dollars on a multi year contract. Kapanen will never learn basic hockey IQ - regardless of coach - maybe that's what bothers you?
It is so bizarre that people can still defend this guy and the only reason I can think of is to improve his HFBoards trade value.
Feel free to bookmark when he goes to Winnipeg or Arizona or whatever and still fails to top 15 goals.
Danton Heinen was less of a talent in Boston than Kapanen was in Toronto, he then stunk out the joint in Anaheim and has been largely streaky last season to useless this season and yet blokes hold out hope.Even Kapanen "proving you wrong" would just be him being a functional NHL player.
Bottom line is at some point you don't have any upside. There's a ton of fringe NHL skill players out there and they don't cost $3M. The bloom has fallen off the rose with this player, and his best contribution to this team are the GetGo commercials.
Since Garbage Heinen only signed 1m, we are lucky it was just Kapanen qualified that made it that way. Had the Pens signed Heinen to a multi year deal we'd be stuck with a shittier player to deal while Kapanen might be sour grapes for a bunch of babies here, even if they move him for very little, he's movable as teams know he's a decent player that wasn't a good fit on the Pens.The screw up was qualifying Kapanen IMO, I think that decision directly resulted in them being screwed with the cap.
I don’t think they would have re-signed Kapanen had they known Heinen was coming back, but they couldn’t retract the qualifying offer at that point.
Meh, he might not be one of their top 12 forwards because Sullivan has predetermined the type of player each spot in the lineup should be and Kapanen doesn't fit his spot, but I think the chances of Kap being a better player than Archibald, Poehling, Heinen, maybe even McGinn are pretty good.They both are bad. It's moot now though that he's not in our top 12 best forwards and he costs 3.2 million dollars.
When Kap goes to another team I won't be sour about it by any means. I'll be happy for him if he proves me wrong and succeeds. I will be happy in pretty much any scenario that involves Kapanen leaving the Penguins.
I think we need a poll: would you rather see 1) Kappy go to another team or 2) Mike Sullivan go to another team? Lol
Horvat's a stretch, but Garland would be large.What would we have that JR would reasonably be interested in for Horvat? I don't think the old bat's gonna bite on a Kapanen-Dumoulin for Horvat proposal.