Skill isn't an identity, it's a tool, and I'll criticise head coaches for valuing two-way players when I start seeing cup champions that aren't built on two-way players throughout the forward lines with maybe a couple of carefully shielded elite attacking players who can freelance.
The identity has usually been an emphasis on strong transition, lots of puck pressure, lots of skating. Which, yeah, mightn't be an ideal identity for three guys in their mid-thirties. I don't think it's the ideal identity for the Stanley Cup playoffs either right now, where victory is usually going to teams that are willing to play passive and clog. But then again, that maybe isn't suited to Tanger, who isn't the biggest, or Geno, who likes to freelance a lot, or Sid, who played awfully under Johnston.
But once again, I care less about the identity than I do sticking hard to it and being willing to pay to execute it as necessary. I'd rather see the team go out there with a C- identity that they can at least execute up and down the line up and are good at then some jumble of players trying to do everything and that can do nothing.
And hey, I get there's not a whole lot of assets. That's why we don't have a ton of high end skill. Consistently capped out team that spent all its picks long ago doesn't have amazing players is not news.
And I think that's part of why not going to a more passive, clogging identity is hard, because the players who can both do that and play with skill are expensive. Fast and scrappy is at a discount right now.
But that's all up to the GM. Who right now isn't impressing and my only real defence for him is he's probably executing orders from the top.