Rust's NTC drops this summer. I still don't think they move him unless Sullivan's fired after the season, sadly.
I've been thinking about what the coming off-season looks like and I think it truly depends on the entire year. I'm not convinced that there is a move that is made or not made that changes directions. If we finish bottom 5, I think there could be drastic changes, which I would welcome. I think that could easily include Rust and/or Rakell. Might also depend on the draft pick. Let's say for argument sake we get a wing prospect like Misa that is (magically) ready to step into the NHL and you make the trade for Hoglander. Say something like Hoglander+1st for Pettersson+Acciari+3rd. If that's the case, you can cash in on someone still wanting Rust (for some reason). Not only that, but it opens up a roster spot and some cap space.
On the other hand, if we go on a run like we did late last season, I do worry that they will look at the roster as one that can compete and they will elect to keep it together. That's why I'm, sadly, actively rooting for a bad finish. Just to eliminate the "well...Maaaaaaaaaybe?" opportunity for Dubas.
Hoglander-Sid-Rakell
DOC-Malkin-Tomasino
McGroarty-Ponomarov-Puljujarvi
Hayes-Lizotte-Glass
Is what I would be shooting for next season. Ideally you get something like a Berggren+2nd back for Rust.
We also get $2.8mil back next year from the expiring retention deals. Glass is a RFA but isn't going to make no $2.5mil. I'd wager $1.5mil at best. And we have a couple expiring deals - Nieto, Beauvillier, DOC, Gryz, Pettersson (though 100% traded). If you can get DOC, Puljujarvi, and Glass back at less than $5mil combined (which is very reasonable to suggest), it could really open up the possibilities of taking on another guy for payment. Like you could talk to Calgary about Huberdeau, you could talk to NYR about Trouba, you could talk to Edmonton about Kane, NYI about Pageau...it opens up a larger Hayes-Like deal. Like, I would be willing to toy with the idea of Zibanejad if it meant we could get a decent pick or prospect out of it. Like Graves+prospect for Zibanejad+Othmann+2nd
Tbh I feel like Rust is the kind of guy that brings back way more than most fans would expect, while Rakell is a guy that brings back less than what most fans expect.
I agree that I would guess GMs around the league would, strangely, value Rust at a higher level than us but I do wonder if Rakell's scoring this year makes a GM think twice about trading for him. Last year/early this year, I would have said zero chance any GMs takes the chance but with 10 goals in 24gp on a struggling Penguins team, it makes me wonder if a market wouldn't open up. Three years left at $5mil isn't the worst contract to take on if you are looking for a do-all top 6 wing. I think we just have to balance how much we want to get out of the deal with the return. I wouldn't dump him for a 4th and a cap dump.