BlindWillyMcHurt
ti kallisti
- May 31, 2004
- 36,643
- 31,848
Necas is apparently not re-signing in Carolina and Carolina is going to buy out Kotkaniemi.
Boy... this whole situation really panned out great for them.
Buncha jerks.
Necas is apparently not re-signing in Carolina and Carolina is going to buy out Kotkaniemi.
I think it was a self-own right off the bat, to be fair. No hindsight needed.In retrospect, the Kotkaniemi offer sheet was a huge self-own. Many Canes fans who were gloating about that situation have a lot of egg on their face now.
In retrospect, the Kotkaniemi offer sheet was a huge self-own. Many Canes fans who were gloating about that situation have a lot of egg on their face now.
In retrospect, the Kotkaniemi offer sheet was a huge self-own. Many Canes fans who were gloating about that situation have a lot of egg on their face now.
He's bad for the cap hit he has. At least we know Smith would be good once he leaves this team.We should give Carolina Lars Eller or Reilly Smith to take the Kotkaniemi contract plus a 3rd.
He's bad for the cap hit he has. At least we know Smith would be good once he leaves this team.
Where is everyone seeing that Necas won't resign and they are buying out KK?
Seems like a knee jerk reaction mere hours after being eliminated.
Where is everyone seeing that Necas won't resign and they are buying out KK?
Seems like a knee jerk reaction mere hours after being eliminated.
Where is everyone seeing that Necas won't resign and they are buying out KK?
Seems like a knee jerk reaction mere hours after being eliminated.
If he'd come in at a similar pay rate to Eller, I'd be okay trying him here.I'd try to sign Kotkaniemi if he'd hit free agency but trading for his $5 million long term deal, trading for that looks pretty iffy to me.
I might do Graves for Kotkaniemi though.
How was Kotkaniemi being deployed this season? I don't watch much Canes hockey because I value my eyeballs but I can't help but notice that his production took a dive from last season in which he was at least somewhat respectable for a team that is nearly as shit at generating offense as the Penguins are.
In some ways 5M for a 3ish C with some possible upside isn't AWFUL. But that term... yikes. And would dude even really be able to hack 3C on this team?
I'd try to sign Kotkaniemi if he'd hit free agency but trading for his $5 million long term deal, trading for that looks pretty iffy to me.
I might do Graves for Kotkaniemi though.
This team isn't getting younger through trades. They are going to have to take swings and hope things pop. Kotkaniemi is one year removed for 40+ pt season. He can fit in our top six better than any other player on our roster if we have a top six C injury in Sid or Malkin. He allows us to dump a contract and save cap and in the proposal he is returning a 3rd.
They can take swings and hope things pop without trading for a guy who has 6 years and $5 million left on his deal.
If he goes the Galchenyuk or Kapanen route and becomes terrible at like age 25, they're stuck with that cap hit for an additional 3 or 4 years for a terrible player.
Who cares? 3 years from now the goal is going to be to fill out the roster with terrible players.
You also could easily get a player that bounces back to a 40 pt C that you can trade in 3 or 4 years for a nice return at 27.
So the upside here is getting a 40 point 3C. The downside is that he regresses similarly to Galchenyuk and ends up a complete anchor of a contract at $5 million with 3-4 years left.
Yeah, you're not doing a good job at selling this. If you have to say "his contract won't be significant when the cap rises" or "who cares if he sucks" to make your case, it's a weak case. The upside just isn't there with him to even remotely justify the downside that could come with him.
I'd sign him to like a 3 year, $3.5 million deal or so in free agency and accept that risk, but at 6 years and $5 million, that is way too big of a contract to just brush aside the risks there.
if they are planning to buy him out, they should be willing to retain the same if not more on his contract, just to be getting something back. imoI'd try to sign Kotkaniemi if he'd hit free agency but trading for his $5 million long term deal, trading for that looks pretty iffy to me.
if they are planning to buy him out, they should be willing to retain the same if not more on his contract, just to be getting something back. imo