Post-Game Talk: Pens 2, Oilers 1: The Junior Player Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,683
21,214
Let's not spend any more assets on a defense that's going to be **** until Scuderi's removed from the equation. Maatta's babysitting Scuderi right now when he needs to be able to concentrate on himself.

Fix the problems you can in-house before you start making it rain futures to solve a problem you might be able to address with a little patience and common sense.
 

DesertPenguin

Registered User
Apr 22, 2015
3,139
1,651
I honestly don't have a problem with Lovejoy being in the lineup as long as it's in a limited role instead of being forced onto the top pairing like he was last playoffs. We need to stop blaming him for the Despres trade - he didn't make that decision the Nazgul did.

LJ is a oerfectly competent 3rd pairing RHD, and a right shot at that which we are short on. He's fine.

I'd run this for now

Cole - Letang
Dumoulin - Lovejoy
Maatta - Clendening

If the end game is Maatta - Letang, get Maatta sheltered minutes now with Letang - lite and see if he improves. Ideally, he is ready to move up the same time Pouliot is ready to come up, and we see this for the second half.

Maatta - Letang
Dumoulin - Cole
Pouliot - Lovejoy
Clendening

Scuderi has got to go, but I doubt he does while our PK is putting up the unreal stats it currently is.
 

plaidchuck

Registered User
Feb 26, 2013
5,638
0
Pittsburgh
Let's not spend any more assets on a defense that's going to be **** until Scuderi's removed from the equation. Maatta's babysitting Scuderi right now when he needs to be able to concentrate on himself.

Fix the problems you can in-house before you start making it rain futures to solve a problem you might be able to address with a little patience and common sense.

This is the correct answer. If they refuse to get rid of scuderi, then they can sleep in the bed they have made.
 

Waffle Fries

Registered User
Mar 7, 2013
18,086
2
The overreactions on this site are hilarious. We're not winning the way I want to win, MJ needs fired! The team is 9-4 when a good chunk of the team (top-6, D outside of Dumoulin) is struggling. Yes, the insane save% of Fleury and Zatkoff isn't sustainable. However, neither are the struggles of the D or top-6. You guys really need some perspective, the reactions here are way too much.

Just a few weeks ago you were saying that MJ was so bad that you wanted Bylsma back over him.
 

Waffle Fries

Registered User
Mar 7, 2013
18,086
2
And that was when Kunitz was glued to Crosby's hip and MJ refused to take him off and Perron was playing RW on the 4th line, along with the team was losing. Things change.

Things change, but it's a bit hypocritical to accuse and complain about others overreacting when you aren't immune to it yourself.
 

crawz87

Registered User
Mar 18, 2010
1,061
3
None of the Pen's defensemen can shoot the puck. We need a heavy and accurate shot from the point.
 

madinsomniac

Registered User
Jul 3, 2012
12,854
3,022
Pittsburgh, Pa
All our bad players plus very late picks.

Not true, we have a logjam at the Goalie position in the minors and really no opening on the NHL team in the near future... we could move Murray or Jarry for a good return if needed, but before then we best find out if guys like Clandenning are able to be used regularly. We also really can spare one forward off this team... we don't need a fourth line as good as it looks to be.

And for what its worth Scuds would have value to the right team... and Kunitz would also have some value to teams that overvalue veteran guys with good reps, which there are always a few GMs out there looking for that for whatever reason. Lovejoy still has some value too, though as a UFA that is limited.
 

Jacob

as seen on TV
Feb 27, 2002
49,724
25,587
Not true, we have a logjam at the Goalie position in the minors and really no opening on the NHL team in the near future... we could move Murray or Jarry for a good return if needed, but before then we best find out if guys like Clandenning are able to be used regularly. We also really can spare one forward off this team... we don't need a fourth line as good as it looks to be.

And for what its worth Scuds would have value to the right team... and Kunitz would also have some value to teams that overvalue veteran guys with good reps, which there are always a few GMs out there looking for that for whatever reason. Lovejoy still has some value too, though as a UFA that is limited.

I'm 100% certain if they placed Kunitz and Scuderi on waivers right now they would clear.
 

mpp9

Registered User
Dec 5, 2010
32,616
5,074
Let's not spend any more assets on a defense that's going to be **** until Scuderi's removed from the equation. Maatta's babysitting Scuderi right now when he needs to be able to concentrate on himself.

Fix the problems you can in-house before you start making it rain futures to solve a problem you might be able to address with a little patience and common sense.

Maatta ain't babysitting ****. He's his own problem right now. He'd get **** on if you put him against the opponent's best players 20-25 minutes/night.

That leaves moving Dumoulin up, which again, means you basically are hemmed in your own zone when the other two pairings are out there.

I'm in favor of calling up DP at some point and letting Maatta get his conditioning and strength back before making a trade. Then you have options.
 
Last edited:

Headshot77

Bad Photoshopper
Feb 15, 2015
3,969
1,973
Dumolin-Letang
Maatta-Cole
Pouliot-Clendenning/Lovejoy

That is what we should be running right now.
 

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,683
21,214
Maatta ain't babysitting ****. He's his own problem right now. He'd get **** on if you put him against the opponent's best players 20-25 minutes/night.

That leaves moving Dumoulin up, which again, means you basically are hemmed in your own zone when the other two pairings are out there.

I'm in favor of calling up DP at some point and letting Maatta get his conditioning and strength back before making a trade. Then you have options.

Maatta is babysitting ****. ;)

He does have his own problems, but they're being exacerbated by being the only outlet option every single time he takes the ice, and trying to compensate for Scuderi's non-existent footspeed defending the rush when he has issues there himself. I've seen Scuderi have two steps on a guy and Maatta recognizing that Scuds still wouldn't be able to cut his man off, so he had to swoop in himself and dive to block off the passing lane. That's something he shouldn't have to worry about coming back from a year-long hiatus.

Despres could manage that sort of thing regularly because he was a stellar skater. Maatta...not so much.
 
Last edited:

ColePens

RIP Fugu Buffaloed & parabola
Mar 27, 2008
107,025
67,650
Pittsburgh
I don't know why we even talk about it anymore. Kunitz is highly valued on the Pens. They probably just see him in a slump. Scuds is obviously valued as he will probably play over Dumo :laugh: if they had to put Clendening in.
 

Son Goku

henlo u stinky egg
Mar 8, 2014
11,891
2,177
The World Of Void
Facebook pens fans are insufferable. They still believe Kunitz is a key component to this team and that nothing is wrong with the team in general.
 

Headshot77

Bad Photoshopper
Feb 15, 2015
3,969
1,973
I don't know why we even talk about it anymore. Kunitz is highly valued on the Pens. They probably just see him in a slump. Scuds is obviously valued as he will probably play over Dumo :laugh: if they had to put Clendening in.

Are we so sure about this? I mean, he has been demoted to the third line. I don't think he will be scratched any time soon, but they at least see that he isn't an effective top six player anymore.
 

3074326

Registered User
Apr 9, 2009
11,620
11,084
USA
I didn't think they looked all that bad last night. I don't recall anyone looking horrible. Our third line was excellent, and I thought the 4th was solid again. Crosby and Malkin were dangerous. Kessel scored. Zatkoff had some shaky moments, but aside from the bad goal he was good enough.

The style they're playing can be boring, but there were long periods of dominance last night. It wasn't that bad. The goals will come if they keep it up.

I even thought Scuderi had a not horrible game.

I'm curious if the fact that I did not read HFBoards during the game changed how I viewed the game... We're negative on here.. lol
 

ColePens

RIP Fugu Buffaloed & parabola
Mar 27, 2008
107,025
67,650
Pittsburgh
Are we so sure about this? I mean, he has been demoted to the third line. I don't think he will be scratched any time soon, but they at least see that he isn't an effective top six player anymore.

If dupers or fehr pk, it's kunitz going out with Crosby next. Not plots. Not Sprong. Not boning. Not even Bennett. It's kunitz.

Actions speak louder than words, imo.
 

ColePens

RIP Fugu Buffaloed & parabola
Mar 27, 2008
107,025
67,650
Pittsburgh
I didn't think they looked all that bad last night. I don't recall anyone looking horrible. Our third line was excellent, and I thought the 4th was solid again. Crosby and Malkin were dangerous. Kessel scored. Zatkoff had some shaky moments, but aside from the bad goal he was good enough.

The style they're playing can be boring, but there were long periods of dominance last night. It wasn't that bad. The goals will come if they keep it up.

I even thought Scuderi had a not horrible game.

I'm curious if the fact that I did not read HFBoards during the game changed how I viewed the game... We're negative on here.. lol

I thought edm controlled the play. They had four dingers and that game could have been in their favor.
 

madinsomniac

Registered User
Jul 3, 2012
12,854
3,022
Pittsburgh, Pa
Part of the problem is we aren't going to get sustained control in the opponents zone because two of our pairings are literally looking to fall back at every chance to protect themselves... Maata isn't going to be jumping up for a 50/50 puck when scuds is covering him and scuds is thinking about dropping back out of the zone the second the puck is close to an opponent cause he doesnt have the foot speed to catch up... lovejoy's pairing may actually have better physical abilities but they play overly passive too...
 

Joejosh999

Registered User
Mar 13, 2014
2,738
465
I agree Maatta is babysitting ***** but I still think he's looked average at best. He had what, one game w Clendening and looked far better....?
I want to see him away from Scuds to get a better read, but I still think he's not right physically. Whether that is the shoulder or the thyroid/energy level thing, not sure. But looks more energy to me.
 

crawz87

Registered User
Mar 18, 2010
1,061
3
With that one crazy cross ice pass Scuderi made last game, MJ is never going to bench him again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Slovakia vs Romania
    Slovakia vs Romania
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $5,000.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Ukraine vs Belgium
    Ukraine vs Belgium
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $800.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Czechia vs Turkey
    Czechia vs Turkey
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Georgia vs Portugal
    Georgia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $5,530.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Ecuador vs Jamaica
    Ecuador vs Jamaica
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad