- Mar 4, 2011
- 27,459
- 20,053
Why wouldn't he have been taken? Whether you want to look at it from:
1. Seattle could have taken him and flipped him for a good futures return
2. Seattle could have taken him and played him as a top-6 center
Nothing there tells me that Carter was safe in the expansion draft if left exposed.
Seattle's current top-9 centers are Gourde, McCann and Jarnkrok. Jarnkrok hasn't been a regular center since 2016-2017 and McCann has never been a regular center outside of injuries.
Mainly he's old and there were other good options for Seattle to take. Tanev or Zucker always seemed more likely to me. ZAR as well even.
I don't think he was for sure safe so I understand why the Pens opted to protect him but I feel like there was a good chance he would have slipped through. It's irrelevant in any case because losing Tanev is an acceptable outcome.