Value of: Penguins blow-up

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
15,973
10,685
It seems weird that Detroit would trade Copp and additional futures for Rust. Copp is younger and has 1 less year on his deal. Whether you want to question the cap hit or signing, he at least can fit in anywhere for them. I don't see Rust getting as much powerplay time or as many minutes in general on Detroit right now.
 

StIvany4Norris

Registered User
Oct 13, 2020
637
748
Where are Penguin fans in the know at, in terms of how much they'd pay to move Graves out?


Fellow Canucks fans would lynch me for even suggesting it, but honestly...they need to fix this defence and Graves is a guy who has shown he can play legit, leveraged Top-4 minutes with the right partner. He'd legitimately be their third best defenceman probably.

Contract is obviously untenable, but i'm wondering if Pittsburgh would put assets on the table to make that deal move, that would grease the wheels for a three-way-ish trade somehow?

No idea what that would look like, and other Canucks fans will just yell at me about it. But i'm curious if there's a third team they could get involved that could make it work somehow?
Graves is more of a bad fit than a bad player imo

Not putting picks/prospects on the table to move him but would happily take back someone similar or a bad contract
 

Mike Jones

Registered User
Apr 12, 2007
12,638
3,054
Calgary
Does Dubas have it in him to do the right thing if the situation calls for the trading away of pending UFAs?

And even if he wants to start the tear down will ownership let him?
 

deakka

Registered User
Nov 6, 2009
4,799
913
Does Dubas have it in him to do the right thing if the situation calls for the trading away of pending UFAs?

And even if he wants to start the tear down will ownership let him?
He did with Guentzel. And I would guess a few are as good as gone this season as well. Pettersson and Eller for sure. Then depending on interest maybe someone else
 

Sideline

Registered User
May 23, 2004
11,459
3,344
He did with Guentzel. And I would guess a few are as good as gone this season as well. Pettersson and Eller for sure. Then depending on interest maybe someone else
Completely agree. The Penguins have enough cap flexibility that they could have extended Pettersson this summer if they were so inclined. It's pretty obvious they left him as a pending UFA so he could be traded if the season fell apart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barsky

1865

Alpha Couturier
Feb 28, 2005
16,930
5,715
Chester, UK
As others have said, blowing it up is moving Crosby and Malkin.

I have absolutely no idea what kind of trade value those two have considering their age.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,628
17,007
Victoria
There are a lot of teams that would be bidding to add Pettersson to their lineup.

I see DOC also being highly coveted at the deadline.

The Pens actually have some pieces to kickstart a rebuild, if FSG actually wanted to.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,450
85,948
Redmond, WA
As others have said, blowing it up is moving Crosby and Malkin.

I have absolutely no idea what kind of trade value those two have considering their age.

The issue is that neither of those guys would allow a trade.

In a perfect world, I think you sell off everyone not named Crosby and Malkin and let Crosby and Malkin mentor the next generation of players. I wouldn't hesitate in the slightest to move anyone else, including Letang and Karlsson. The issue is that these guys have such horrid deals that there is basically no way that they can be moved.

Karlsson has 3 years left at $10 million, so I could maybe see the Penguins being able to get value for him with retaining $4 million or so. But Letang is 37 already and his contract runs until he's 41, even with the reasonable AAV I think he's unmovable.
 

TageGod

Registered User
Aug 31, 2022
2,385
1,590
Been saying this for a few years to trade Crosby, Malkin, and Letang since Pens are shot. Rebuild will be done in 3 years. Let them chase some more cups. Bring them all back to retire at the end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barsky

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,450
85,948
Redmond, WA
Been saying this for a few years to trade Crosby, Malkin, and Letang since Pens are shot. Rebuild will be done in 3 years. Let them chase some more cups. Bring them all back to retire at the end.

Malkin's likely retiring after next year and Letang's deal is downright immovable IMO.

Guentzel was one trade so I didn't know if that was a one-of or a part of a bigger plan.

I think Dubas' moves since has shown he clearly knows what this team is at this point. I don't think you're taking on Kevin Hayes for picks if you aren't rebuilding, or at least soft rebuilding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mike Jones

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
34,059
12,168
I think it's evident that this team sucks and desperately needs to tear down the roster. The amount of trade chips the Penguins have is a bit limited, but I think the main ones are:

-Pettersson: 1 year at $4 million
-O'Connor: 1 year at $925k
-Eller: 1 year at $2.45 million
-Rust: 4 years at $5.125 million, Penguins likely need to take a bad deal back
-Rakell: 4 years at $5 million, Penguins likely need to take a bad deal back
-Nedjelkovic: 2 years at $2.5 million

Karlsson and Bunting are also potential trade chips, but both need to start playing better for either to be worthwhile in a discussion (plus Karlsson would require significant retention and the Penguins only have 1 retention slot left this year). I think everyone else on the team is either untradeable, won't be traded or has no value.

A couple of ideas I have:

-Pettersson to Vancouver for Elias Pettersson (defenseman) and a 2nd
-Rust to Detroit for Copp and additional futures

What are the Penguins looking for?
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,450
85,948
Redmond, WA
What are the Penguins looking for?

Picks and prospects. I'd guess that Dubas would prefer prospects based on the Guentzel trade, but his other trades make me think it would be fine either way.

Their prospect pool is asscheeks outside of goalie prospects, that's the only position they don't need prospects in.
 

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
34,059
12,168
Picks and prospects. I'd guess that Dubas would prefer prospects based on the Guentzel trade, but his other trades make me think it would be fine either way.

Their prospect pool is asscheeks outside of goalie prospects, that's the only position they don't need prospects in.

Would you take Pettersson for Benoit, 2nd, Nick Robertson?

Other prospects available include Roni Hirvonen, Topi Niemela (would prefer to only deal him if an extension is happening)

Dubas and Clark also drafted Nick Moldenhauer, his rights are also a possibility in the dea.

So basically Benoit ($ - 1.35M, 2 yrs after this remaining), 2nd and one of those prospects/Robertson (it would depend on how you feel about Robertson)

for Pettersson
 

CheckingLineCenter

Registered User
Aug 10, 2018
9,420
10,253
It’s kinda more painful upfront but I’d prefer getting higher picks down the road

For instance, if instead of trading Eller for a 2024 3rd you can get a 2026-28 2nd…. I’d prefer that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sideline

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,450
85,948
Redmond, WA
Would you take Pettersson for Benoit, 2nd, Nick Robertson?

Other prospects available include Roni Hirvonen, Topi Niemela (would prefer to only deal him if an extension is happening)

Dubas and Clark also drafted Nick Moldenhauer, his rights are also a possibility in the dea.

So basically Benoit ($ - 1.35M, 2 yrs after this remaining), 2nd and one of those prospects/Robertson (it would depend on how you feel about Robertson)

for Pettersson

I think that offer would be beat very easily.

I proposed Elias Petterson (D-man) and a 2nd from Vancouver, and it seems like others here think that Pettersson would bring back even more than that.
 

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
34,059
12,168
I think that offer would be beat very easily.

I proposed Elias Petterson (D-man) and a 2nd from Vancouver, and it seems like others here think that Pettersson would bring back even more than that.

Most likely.

There's definitely a gap, Minten, Grebenkin, Cowan, Danford and Chadwick are guys I don't see them moving for a rental.
 

1865

Alpha Couturier
Feb 28, 2005
16,930
5,715
Chester, UK
The issue is that neither of those guys would allow a trade.

In a perfect world, I think you sell off everyone not named Crosby and Malkin and let Crosby and Malkin mentor the next generation of players. I wouldn't hesitate in the slightest to move anyone else, including Letang and Karlsson. The issue is that these guys have such horrid deals that there is basically no way that they can be moved.

Karlsson has 3 years left at $10 million, so I could maybe see the Penguins being able to get value for him with retaining $4 million or so. But Letang is 37 already and his contract runs until he's 41, even with the reasonable AAV I think he's unmovable.

Do you think neither would accept a trade to a contender? Crosby has been the face for a long time, but Malkin...? I think he'd entertain it. Letang would be tough but yeh, you could move Karlsson.
 

Luigi Lemieux

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
21,978
10,278
Well I did say years ago. OFC the blow up is worth much less now.
Years ago they were still a contending team. They won the division in 2021. No one's going to rebuild while being a top team. Team fell off a cliff in early 2023 and have been mediocre to bad since.
 

Benstheman

Registered User
Nov 20, 2014
7,209
3,401
Has a Habs fan, i would pay a fair amount of picks and prospects to get Crosby out of your hands.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad