Fatass
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 23,950
- 15,662
It will cost assets to move EK. He has four years left at over 11 per.Add EK and they can do a very somewhat fast rebuild. The assets coming back in theory should expedite things.
It will cost assets to move EK. He has four years left at over 11 per.Add EK and they can do a very somewhat fast rebuild. The assets coming back in theory should expedite things.
I think it's evident that when Crosby resigned, it came with a tacit understanding that they will not blow open the team before he retire.I think it's evident that this team sucks and desperately needs to tear down the roster. The amount of trade chips the Penguins have is a bit limited, but I think the main ones are:
If we're replacing Skinner, we need an upgrade. Ned is not an upgrade.Oilers would like to be in on Petterson and possibly replace skinner with nedelkovich.
Now do it knowing Kyle Dubas will be negotiating these deals. If we get more than a 3rd for Pettersson while not taking a cap dump like Bunting back, I’ll be pleasantly surprised.Here is what I think the value would be for these players...
-Pettersson: 1 year at $4 million 2nd + Prospect
-O'Connor: 1 year at $925k 2nd
-Eller: 1 year at $2.45 million 3rd
-Rust: 4 years at $5.125 million, Penguins likely need to take a bad deal back - No value. Likely only way you get out is a a bad contract swap.
-Rakell: 4 years at $5 million, Penguins likely need to take a bad deal back - No value. Likely only way you get out is a a bad contract swap.
-Nedjelkovic: 2 years at $2.5 million - 4th
Now do it knowing Kyle Dubas will be negotiating these deals. If we get more than a 3rd for Pettersson while not taking a cap dump like Bunting back, I’ll be pleasantly surprised.
Why would we trade him?What's the cost for Blomqvist?
I can't see a cost controlled goaltender being moved.What's the cost for Blomqvist?
Absolutely comical decision by the Pens. This team will be wandering the wilderness for a decade plus if they let this core see out these contracts.I think it's evident that when Crosby resigned, it came with a tacit understanding that they will not blow open the team before he retire.
That's the direction they chose 2+ years ago when they re-signed Malkin and Letang.Absolutely comical decision by the Pens. This team will be wandering the wilderness for a decade plus if they let this core see out these contracts.
Too complicated.I think it's evident that this team sucks and desperately needs to tear down the roster. The amount of trade chips the Penguins have is a bit limited, but I think the main ones are:
-Pettersson: 1 year at $4 million
-O'Connor: 1 year at $925k
-Eller: 1 year at $2.45 million
-Rust: 4 years at $5.125 million, Penguins likely need to take a bad deal back
-Rakell: 4 years at $5 million, Penguins likely need to take a bad deal back
-Nedjelkovic: 2 years at $2.5 million
Karlsson and Bunting are also potential trade chips, but both need to start playing better for either to be worthwhile in a discussion (plus Karlsson would require significant retention and the Penguins only have 1 retention slot left this year). I think everyone else on the team is either untradeable, won't be traded or has no value.
A couple of ideas I have:
-Pettersson to Vancouver for Elias Pettersson (defenseman) and a 2nd
-Rust to Detroit for Copp and additional futures
Absolutely comical decision by the Pens. This team will be wandering the wilderness for a decade plus if they let this core see out these contracts.
I don’t think he meant it like that.Yeah, comical to reward the 2nd best player in franchise history that brought them 4 SCFS.
I don’t think he meant it like that.
Also , Gurgs, bobholly has a good point, Dubas will probably fire Sullivan before trading players
Not like anyone outside the org would know for sure, but most of us on here stipulate Sully is untouchable, even moreso than Dubas who has 6 years left on his own contract.I don’t think he meant it like that.
Also , Gurgs, bobholly has a good point, Dubas will probably fire Sullivan before trading players
I'll wait for Gurgs or Empoleon to confirm this .. but wow if trueNot like anyone outside the org would know for sure, but most of us on here stipulate Sully is untouchable, even moreso than Dubas who has 6 years left on his own contract.
Sullivan and FSG have that weird Boston bromance thing going on and FSG's chairman was just quoted 3 weeks ago as saying Sullivan is a top-2 or top-3 coach in the NHL. Or in layman's terms, "Sullivan is here to stay forever".
Both of those guys will definitely confirm, but also you don't need to look much further than the results from the last 7 seasons straight, where he pissed away the years our 3 HOF guys were age 30-37.I'll wait for Gurgs or Empoleon to confirm this .. but wow if true
He's our Askarov at the moment. To move him, I imagine Dubas would need to get an Askarov-level offer back which is basically a 1st round prospect and an early first.What's the cost for Blomqvist?
I would say it's more lore in Pittsburghtown right now, but it's still accurate. I think Dubas DOES have the "power" to fire Sullivan. But I think with any coaching change comes a discussion with the ownership, and he's right. The FSG ownership LOVES Sullivan and thinks he's still a top-five coach in hockey. So when it comes time to have that discussion, it would be tough for Dubas to get FSG on board with firing him. So think Sullivan has a lot of safety that 99.9999% of coaches in the NHL history do not have.I'll wait for Gurgs or Empoleon to confirm this .. but wow if true
Askarov is a better prospect goalie with higher pedigree and potential and he didnt get that offer you mentionedHe's our Askarov at the moment. To move him, I imagine Dubas would need to get an Askarov-level offer back which is basically a 1st round prospect and an early first.
I would say it's more lore in Pittsburghtown right now, but it's still accurate. I think Dubas DOES have the "power" to fire Sullivan. But I think with any coaching change comes a discussion with the ownership, and he's right. The FSG ownership LOVES Sullivan and thinks he's still a top-five coach in hockey. So when it comes time to have that discussion, it would be tough for Dubas to get FSG on board with firing him. So think Sullivan has a lot of safety that 99.9999% of coaches in the NHL history do not have.
I don't think it's a case of "Welcome aboard Kyle, first rule is you can't fire Mike Sullivan" though.
Why would a rebuilding team with no reliable starter trade a promising 22 year old goalie?Askarov is a better prospect goalie with higher pedigree and potential and he didnt get that offer you mentioned
Got a 1st round prospect (B+ prospect) + VGKs 2025 1st which will be a late 20s pick
I cant see Blomqvist getting an early 1st rounder back (10-15 range) unless its a thrown in prospect only