OthmarAmmann
Omnishambles
Winnipeg is not a priority for the NHL nor is Quebec. Winnipeg is a stop gap... a case of last resort. If team a fails and we need a quick exit, enter TNSE.
There is zero priority in this market for the NHL. These desperate small Canadian markets are great for this situation. You can pander to them with the 'Oh of course 15,000 is big enough for the NHL'... "ooooh we need to correct a mistake we made in the past'. It gets everyone all warm and fuzzy, but it just keeps the palate wet in case they need to move a team. Otherwise there no intent on returning to this market.
If it weren't for the WHA, there never would have been NHL teams in Quebec City or Winnipeg. Likely wouldn't be one in Edmonton for that matter. Deserve or demand pays no matter in today's NHL. Large market presence is the priority. Note I never mentioned large hockey market presence, because most of the hockey market is un-served.
It was the reality in 96 and is the reality today. The NHL owes Winnipeg nothing. The only part that the NHL cares about Winnipeg is that Jonathan Toews was conceived here. Its time to face facts my friend. Winnipeg may get a team back... it may even be the Phoenix franchise... but only as half measures.
I'll agree with this. You can question the business sense, but the NHL would certainly rather have a franchise in Phoenix losing $20 - $25 mm per year than a franchise in Winnipeg that earns a profit. I think the only reason Winnipeg was even considered was because it was the League's own money that was being lost at the time. I'd guess that if Atlanta were to have to move, it would not end up in Winnipeg. Probably Birmingham before Winnipeg. It's just part of the high-risk, low-reward strategy.