Roster Moves: (Part II) Gostisbehere, 2022 2nd, 2022 7th to AZ, cap relief in return

There is no shot any team gives him 7 years. We shall see what he gets money wise and term. 4 years at what number?
3 years $15M would be my guess as a ceiling. Probably less on both money and term. I mean, it wasn't long ago no team wanted him at $4.5M.
 
3 years $15M would be my guess as a ceiling. Probably less on both money and term. I mean, it wasn't long ago no team wanted him at $4.5M.
Come on man. That was all cap related. No other reason a team with a good GM could have found a way to make it work. All because of the cap hit.

That being said his current contract doesn't mean that much once you hit free agency. IMO anyway.
 
Come on man. That was all cap related. No other reason a team with a good GM could have found a way to make it work. All because of the cap hit.

That being said his current contract doesn't mean that much once you hit free agency. IMO anyway.
What it tells you that as recently as a couple of years ago no team in the league thought he was worth a $4.5M cap hit. Even an expansion team with no cap issues. So I think that's gotta factor in somewhat to predicting what he'll get this summer as a UFA, even though he's put up points in AZ.

Edit: I’ll set the over/unders for Ghost’s next contract as:

Term: 3.5 yrs
Cap hit per: $5.1M

And I’ll take the unders on both. You?
 
What it tells you that as recently as a couple of years ago no team in the league thought he was worth a $4.5M cap hit. Even an expansion team with no cap issues. So I think that's gotta factor in somewhat to predicting what he'll get this summer as a UFA, even though he's put up points in AZ.

Edit: I’ll set the over/unders for Ghost’s next contract as:

Term: 3.5 yrs
Cap hit per: $5.1M

And I’ll take the unders on both. You?
I think the term is good you have. I will go over. 4 years 5.5 or so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghosts Beer
An all-time bad trade in the history of the sport. Will makes lists for years to come. Bad lists that you don't want to be on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flyerfan4life
pedro-pascal.gif
 
The thing that gets me is that it was indefensible at the time...

ignore the player. Ignore the cost.

The whole Ghost, Risto, DeAngelo chain of events would be a fantastic example in a MBA course on asset management and how not to do it.
What about trading a 2024 first round pick for a 2025 first round pick and getting nothing for delaying it a year?
 
Like... in any negotiation, business etc... even partnership building you have to ask specific questions.

Why are we doing this?
Is there an alternative to achieve the same for similar value?

They did not ask either of those with Ghost, Risto and Tony D.

Also, if you have an asset and value it less than the market... well... yeh... that is a cause to sell. But IF you sell you sell early. Never sit on the fence and wait because the asset will lose value (cough Wayne Simmonds cough)... and once you do? Well, generally if the value is nothing then keep it and try and rebuild value!

What you dont do in any business when you have an asset is... talk shit about the asset in public, tell everyone you dont want the asset, and then beg them to take it from you. And then give someone extra value to get rid of it without asking "hey, actually why am I getting rid of this for negative value... the bank are not going to default us, the world wont end...".

Too many GMs just dont ask these kind of questions. Because some of these things are really just day 1 stuff, we went through this when doing classes on arbitration, contract law etc at age 18. I dont know how Fletcher did what he did considering he had a freaking business degree from Harvard, makes it even worse lmao.
 
adding hide avatars option

Ad

Ad