Value of: Panarin @50% (5.82M, 1.5 years remaining)

Sdevils42

Registered User
Nov 30, 2016
281
454
“Is your team strong enough structurally and defensively to accommodate an immensely talented offensive forward that offers nothing else if he isn’t scoring at a PPG clip?”… would be the first question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LokiDog

LokiDog

Get pucks deep. Get pucks to the net. And, uh…
Sep 13, 2018
12,171
24,549
Dallas
I don’t think Panarin’s NMC is as big of an issue as most of you do. When he signed a 7 year deal, controlling where he would be was important to him. Right now, he only has one season remaining after this, and then he gets to pick his destination again. The Rangers are in disarray internally (look at the other thread and all the tweets after the last few games that are coming out) and it seems obvious the band is going to get broken up. Shesterkin’s next contract isn’t a guarantee. Panarin may not have any problem being sent to a contender for 1.5 seasons and then cashing in again. He’s still a 90-100 point player. At 5.8M he could generate a bidding war. Maybe. I’m just thinking outside the box because my team is at a crossroads.
 

Drake1588

UNATCO
Sponsor
Jul 2, 2002
30,305
2,975
Northern Virginia
I tend to think the Rangers' brass knows they are stuck and that not much is going to shake loose at the top of their roster, where the money and the NMCs live. Publicly signaling they are open for business does say that they would make a trade, sure, but even in the absence of actual moves it sends a shot across the bow to the team, especially those who might be complacent.

More messaging than a sign of a trade, I think. In time, they'll have to make some actual moves. Right now, they want the existing roster to play better because they know most of these guys are locked in for a while.
 

JimmyG89

Registered User
May 1, 2010
9,984
8,760
Bumping this guy.

The Rangers are a mess. This goes deeper than a couple players. What would be some legit offers for Panarin. You're getting a top line LW that can produce at a 100pt clip for less than a 6M cap hit.

Rangers need LHD and young C prospects with top 6 upside.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ViD

FSL KINGS

Registered User
May 10, 2021
3,032
2,720
Bumping this guy.

The Rangers are a mess. This goes deeper than a couple players. What would be some legit offers for Panarin. You're getting a top line LW that can produce at a 100pt clip for less than a 6M cap hit.

Rangers need LHD and young C prospects with top 6 upside.
Gavrikov would be a good fit for NYR if King's can't come to a new agreement with him. With how things are trending, NYR may just want to wait for the off-season.
 

JimmyG89

Registered User
May 1, 2010
9,984
8,760
Gavrikov would be a good fit for NYR if King's can't come to a new agreement with him. With how things are trending, NYR may just want to wait for the off-season.
He's definitely more what they need, but I don't see the Kings letting him out of the building. Would be a perfect partner for Fox. I'd hope he is their target for the offseason.

Don't think it'd make sense for the Kings to move Gavrikov in a win now move, he's part of the win-now for the Kings.
 

ViD

#CBJNeedHugs
Sponsor
Apr 21, 2007
32,122
22,985
Blue Jackets Area
Bumping this guy.

The Rangers are a mess. This goes deeper than a couple players. What would be some legit offers for Panarin. You're getting a top line LW that can produce at a 100pt clip for less than a 6M cap hit.

Rangers need LHD and young C prospects with top 6 upside.
Panarin is the last guy you should be trading
 

SI90

Registered User
Jul 25, 2011
87,036
65,822
StrongIsland
If he waived and the rangers retained, with him having another year left I could see a team giving up an insane package.

Would need to be a team that is confident they’re built to win now and able to legit compete for a cup the next couple of years. Florida is a great example but they don’t have the assets or the space. The Jets make sense to me as well. They do have the assets.
 

FSL KINGS

Registered User
May 10, 2021
3,032
2,720
He's definitely more what they need, but I don't see the Kings letting him out of the building. Would be a perfect partner for Fox. I'd hope he is their target for the offseason.

Don't think it'd make sense for the Kings to move Gavrikov in a win now move, he's part of the win-now for the Kings.
Gavrikov has been playing on the right filling in for Doughty all season. Doughty is due back in the next month or so. When that happens the pairs are going to be jumbled up. Moving Gavrikov could be possible then.

King's also let Roy walk UFA last year & won one playoff game. First priority is re-signing Gavrikov. Until that contract is signed though.
 

Roof Daddy

Registered User
Apr 1, 2008
13,215
2,401
IF he’d be willing to waive to Edmonton (maybe if he’s cup motivated):

To NYR: Jeff Skinner, Matt Savoie, Beau Akey, 2025 2nd (STL), 2026 1st (EDM)

To CHI: 2025 3rd (STL)

To EDM: Panarin 75% retained

Not sure if Skinner would waive for NYR, maybe requires a separate trade that sends Skinnner to TOR.

But my gawd the forward lineup once healthy:

Nuge-McDavid-Hyman
Panarin-Draisaitl-Arvidsson
Kane-Henrique-Janmark
Podkolzin-???(upgrade)-Brown
XF: Perry, Kapanen
 

bleedblue94

Registered User
Jun 8, 2004
9,632
10,397
How is gavrikov a name that is repeated multiple times in a thread about Panarin at 50 percent retention? People are absurd
 

Habby4Life

First pick overall goes to the Montreal Canadiens
Nov 12, 2008
4,736
4,698
Shit time goes so fast, I didn’t realize he is 33 for some reason that he was 28/29. Man I’m old.
 

Habby4Life

First pick overall goes to the Montreal Canadiens
Nov 12, 2008
4,736
4,698
He was 24 his rookie year
Yeah, when I read the post my first thought was why would they trade him, he’s only 28/29.

That’s probably why.

Dont pay attention to nyr but it looks like he is having a good year.

Got to wonder what’s going on in nyr. Did coach lose the room or are guys pissed how they handled Trouba. They are really sliding.
 

Adam da bomb

Registered User
May 1, 2016
13,289
10,446
If he waived and the rangers retained, with him having another year left I could see a team giving up an insane package.

Would need to be a team that is confident they’re built to win now and able to legit compete for a cup the next couple of years. Florida is a great example but they don’t have the assets or the space. The Jets make sense to me as well. They do have the assets.
But wing isn’t the jets weakness if we are giving up an insane package it’s for a top rd.
 

FSL KINGS

Registered User
May 10, 2021
3,032
2,720
How is gavrikov a name that is repeated multiple times in a thread about Panarin at 50 percent retention? People are absurd
Panarin LA was on Panarin's list of possible UFA destinations. I remember this because Blake was running around trying to scrape together an offer at the last second because the King's were headed into a rebuild & didn't get around to presenting a legitimate offer. Warning signs have been there with Blake for a while.

#1 addressable need for the King's is a right handed PP specialist & goal scoring.

Places King's can cut cap space,
Moore, 30 goals last year. New system this year isn't working for him. 4.2 AAV

Gavrikov. King's haven't come to terms with him. 5.875 AAV.

Gavrikov would be a good fit in NYR being a left D if King's could work a sign & trade. With Doughty coming back, he could be moved.

Unless NYR doesn't need a top pair D with size?
 

Barnaby

Registered User
Jul 2, 2003
8,845
3,663
Port Jefferson, NY
Don’t think Dolan lets Drury trade him unless they are clearly out of a playoff race. Too much money to lose in a playoff gate and Dolan has an ego.

I’ll say a 1st, 2nd (maybe becomes another first if whatever team wins the cup), young bottom six roster playing or young 3rd pairing D. Everyone wants a blue chip prospect but they seldom get moved.

Also depends if he gives multiple options or just 1 or 2. Maybe a Florida team, Dallas, Colorado, or Vegas.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad