I mean, i see everyone say this, explain? how so? where is it so evident that Kadri will magically decline anytime soon, making the contract an anchor? lets say even if there would be just 2 years of solid 2C play left, where then it would be 3 years left and the cap higher in two years time, i doubt 7 million will be some anchor for an assumed decent 3C with 3 years left if we assume he declines at all to that level, that quickly. People need to catch up to the cap changing.
Well it's really just Lindholm and maybe Stamkos as other top 6 options and they both have their negatives as well.
So ya, it is a weak market but there's never that much that makes it to July 1st
For Nuke and a draft pickBring him back to Colorado please.
We just saw Dubois get traded for positive value after a horrendous season. Kadri literally didn't show up for the first 10 games of this season and still would have lead your team in points this year. For a team that is pushing to win a cup in the next ~3 years (ie your Jets or a team like the Canes) he is absolutely a player they would target. His playstyle is very similar to Sam Bennett and we just witnessed how effective that was over the last 2 months, plus he's already proven to be a very effective player on a championship winning team.Who the f*** would take that contract.
Calgary playing parlour games saying the have no interest in moving him.
No. You have no interest in the shitty return you will get Conroy.
Like most of your recent trades.
its not like hes going to become terrible by next year. All you need is 2 to 3 solid years from him, which seems very likely. and 7 million is not that big of a deal anymore.Aging curves are a thing. If you don't believe in them, more power to you. There are exceptions. I generally don't chase exceptions. I suspect in a couple more years, he won't be very good at hockey and this contract covers 5 more years at ages 34, 35, 36, 37 and 38.
Anchors aren't always defined by the being a certain amount. Ryan Suter just got bought out of a contract that was less than 4 million. The devils bought out Janne Kuokkanen a few years ago at less than 2 million. If the team sucks and they don't need to buy him out because why bother, I guess yay contract victory?
Please no, I never want to see Naz wearing those dirty jerseysThe Sens or Sabres would be a perfect fit.
Why would the Flames want McGroarty unless he’s willing to sign?Larger deal involving Kadri, Ehlers, McGroarty and whatever Calgary picks need need to be involved.
its not like hes going to become terrible by next year. All you need is 2 to 3 solid years from him, which seems very likely. and 7 million is not that big of a deal anymore.
Why wouldn't he be willing to sign? My understanding is that this isn't a Canada thing, it's an NHL thing.Why would the Flames want McGroarty unless he’s willing to sign?
The question is more why would Calgary add picks to get a rental like Ehlers?Why would the Flames want McGroarty unless he’s willing to sign?
I’m not sure of Kadri’s value but that certainly isn’t a correct translation lol.Translation: teams will have to pay up if they want Kadri
He's already 34 years old when next season starts.idk, short term impact?
The guy 3 years older and worse in all areas will net a similar return. Sure buddy.If he gets traded, probably looks something like the Hertl trade.