Fjordy
Soul Dancing in the Dark
- Jun 20, 2018
- 19,496
- 10,837
Could be interesting trading partners, but not sure for Power.Utah?
Could be interesting trading partners, but not sure for Power.Utah?
It's not even that he won't be as good as Dahlin, we need two PMDs in the top 4 anyway, but only two, the question is who to trade Power or Byram. We need to know if Byram wants to stay in Buffalo, if he's willing to be a second-pair guy, what kind of contract he's looking for. I'd listen to offers on both players and see what we can get.Power will never be as good as Dahlin, and he's worth so much more than Byram - it just makes the most sense for it to be him IMO. Obviously depends on the return. Gotta think a lot of teams would call and the return would be a good 'hockey trade'. Buffalo's depth chart needs a retool, and this would be a big one.
Then they simply don't have the pieces. Unless the would make Bedard available.Jones for Power is a ridiculous offer, but Chicago definitely has the pieces for Power, its just that the mutual fit isn't there.
Columbus isn’t trading what it would take and buffalo isn’t trading a 21 for futures/ magic beans.I could easily see the Jackets ponying up a big offer for Power but the contents would depend on what direction Buffalo wants to go. If they are looking for High Ceiling its probably around Lindstrom. If its current help i would expect it to be around Sillinger. Throw in our unprotected 1st and Proverov going back as well. I could see another young player like LDBB or even Chinakov as well, but I don't see the Jackets being willing to include guys like Fantilli, Marchenko, Vronk and KJ if that is what Buffalo demands.
Then they simply don't have the pieces. Unless the would make Bedard available.
Is this a "value of: Bedard" thread?By that standard, Buffalo doesn't have the pieces to land Bedard.
Not one they would trade, no. But that's not really the subject of this thread. Which is Owen Power.By that standard, Buffalo doesn't have the pieces to land Bedard.