Petes1987
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2013
- 1,444
- 1,072
The Peterborough Petes have reassigned Quinn Binnie. The Petes are down to four overages, Chase Lefebvre, Ryder MacIntyre, Jonathan Melee and Liam Sztuska.
The list was most recently updated yesterday with all the preseason rosters being put outAny updates on this list?
I assume Pete’s trade Sztuska and roll with 2 of those guys and bring in an OA D? Rather than 3 OA FThe Peterborough Petes have reassigned Quinn Binnie. The Petes are down to four overages, Chase Lefebvre, Ryder MacIntyre, Jonathan Melee and Liam Sztuska.
That was my initial thinking but with the acquisition of Matthew Jenken I think they will go with the three overage forwards.I assume Pete’s trade Sztuska and roll with 2 of those guys and bring in an OA D? Rather than 3 OA F
Bowen is 19 now and they have rye/Johnson to back up. Some team should pay a decent package for Sztuska.
I forgot about jenken. He is a d.That was my initial thinking but with the acquisition of Matthew Jenken I think they will go with the three overage forwards.
Assuming Sztuska is traded, I can’t imagine the Petes shuffle the remaining 3 OA forwards and acquire a different one assuming that’s what you meanI forgot about jenken. He is a d.
Of the 3 forwards who do you think they trade? I think Melee should get the most value of the 3 but I believe he’s also been there the longest
The only way I could see the Petes not trading Liam Sztuska is if they feel Zach Bowen cannot carrying the load as the starting goaltender. If they decide to keep him I would expect that Peterborough would keep the two forwards they think will contribute the most.Assuming Sztuska is traded, I can’t imagine the Petes shuffle the remaining 3 OA forwards and acquire a different one assuming that’s what you mean
please disregard what I said. I thought jenken was an OA d man. I was wrong. He is an 05. I was confused about why they’d keep 3 OA forwards and then trade for an OA d but obviously I was wrong about that.Assuming Sztuska is traded, I can’t imagine the Petes shuffle the remaining 3 OA forwards and acquire a different one assuming that’s what you mean
If Bowen can’t carry the load he won’t be here then. Might as well give the backup spot to Rye or JohnstonThe only way I could see the Petes not trading Liam Sztuska is if they feel Zach Bowen cannot carrying the load as the starting goaltender. If they decide to keep him I would expect that Peterborough would keep the two forwards they think will contribute the most.
I fully expect one of Easton Rye or Masen Johnston to be the backup to either Zach Bowen or Liam Sztuska. If the Petes keep Sztuska I expect Bowen will be traded.If Bowen can’t carry the load he won’t be here then. Might as well give the backup spot to Rye or Johnston
There is a post on the Kitchener Forum that has a screen shot from OHLRangersNation Instagram Account that suggests the OHL is going to change the overage rules. One item in the post is that a team could keep an overage goaltender that does not count against the three currently allowed. Has anybody know if this is on the table?
There is a post on the Kitchener Forum that has a screen shot from OHLRangersNation Instagram Account that suggests the OHL is going to change the overage rules. One item in the post is that a team could keep an overage goaltender that does not count against the three currently allowed. Has anybody know if this is on the table?
The 67’s have kept Michelone on the roster. To me, that made no sense. I couldn’t see a team out there looking to use an OA spot on a backup goalie. Michelone is fine, probably average or so, but I wouldn’t have thought he’d return as an OA. At first I thought the 67’s were trying to give him an opportunity somewhere and if he didn’t garner any interest then he’d get released at the end of the pre-seaosn.
With this news, I am thinking that the intention would be for him to be a backup or 3rd goalie as a safety net if the OA Goalie doesn’t count. To me, that makes a lot more sense. Then if you factor in the rumour of Flint approaching Ottawa and inquiring about MacKenzie when they already have Day, adding an OA Goalie that doesn’t count toward an OA roster spot would make that rumour more sensical.
The more odd things I am seeing and hearing make more sense with this particular potential rule change coming into effect. Those odd things aren’t quite as odd.
It is the OHL. Anything could happen!its been talking about for 5 years, its not in place right now.
please dont report this to a moderator, the petes are the best!
its not happening, the rule had to be voted in in july
It is the OHL. Anything could happen!
wakley will be signing soon, he wont be back in nb for the start of the season, if at all
What's your definition of "soon"?
This got me interested, so I did some searching. OA goalies with at least 10 games played, since the covid season.Interesting to note that a full half of the league is carrying an OA goalie.
Seems higher than in past years, but I haven't specifically tracked it.
24-25 *ROSTERED* | 23-24 | 22-23 | 21-22 |
Nolan Lalonde - Kingston | Michael Simpson - London | Brett Brochu - London | Mack Guzda - Owen Sound / Barrie |
Jackson Parsons - Kitchener | Matteo Drobac - Brantford | Marco Costantini - Hamilton / Kitchener | Luke Cavallin - Flint |
Owen Willmore - London | Benjamin Gaudreau - Erie | Kevyn Brassard - Sudbury | Zach Paputsakis - Oshawa |
Jacob Oster - Oshawa | Ben West - Barrie | Tristian Lennox - Saginaw | Roman Basran - Mississauga |
Owen Flores - Niagara | Max Donoso - Ottawa/Windsor | Will Cranley - Flint | Mitchell Weeks - Sudbury |
Collin MacKenzie - Ottawa | Ethan Fraser - Erie | Joe Ranger - Sudbury | |
Liam Sztuska - Peterborough | Nick Chenard - Owen Sound | ||
Charlie Schenkel - Soo | |||
Nick Surzycia - Sarnia | |||
Andrew Oke - Saginaw |