Petes1987
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2013
- 1,335
- 988
The Peterborough Petes have reassigned Quinn Binnie. The Petes are down to four overages, Chase Lefebvre, Ryder MacIntyre, Jonathan Melee and Liam Sztuska.
The list was most recently updated yesterday with all the preseason rosters being put outAny updates on this list?
I assume Pete’s trade Sztuska and roll with 2 of those guys and bring in an OA D? Rather than 3 OA FThe Peterborough Petes have reassigned Quinn Binnie. The Petes are down to four overages, Chase Lefebvre, Ryder MacIntyre, Jonathan Melee and Liam Sztuska.
That was my initial thinking but with the acquisition of Matthew Jenken I think they will go with the three overage forwards.I assume Pete’s trade Sztuska and roll with 2 of those guys and bring in an OA D? Rather than 3 OA F
Bowen is 19 now and they have rye/Johnson to back up. Some team should pay a decent package for Sztuska.
I forgot about jenken. He is a d.That was my initial thinking but with the acquisition of Matthew Jenken I think they will go with the three overage forwards.
Assuming Sztuska is traded, I can’t imagine the Petes shuffle the remaining 3 OA forwards and acquire a different one assuming that’s what you meanI forgot about jenken. He is a d.
Of the 3 forwards who do you think they trade? I think Melee should get the most value of the 3 but I believe he’s also been there the longest
The only way I could see the Petes not trading Liam Sztuska is if they feel Zach Bowen cannot carrying the load as the starting goaltender. If they decide to keep him I would expect that Peterborough would keep the two forwards they think will contribute the most.Assuming Sztuska is traded, I can’t imagine the Petes shuffle the remaining 3 OA forwards and acquire a different one assuming that’s what you mean
please disregard what I said. I thought jenken was an OA d man. I was wrong. He is an 05. I was confused about why they’d keep 3 OA forwards and then trade for an OA d but obviously I was wrong about that.Assuming Sztuska is traded, I can’t imagine the Petes shuffle the remaining 3 OA forwards and acquire a different one assuming that’s what you mean
If Bowen can’t carry the load he won’t be here then. Might as well give the backup spot to Rye or JohnstonThe only way I could see the Petes not trading Liam Sztuska is if they feel Zach Bowen cannot carrying the load as the starting goaltender. If they decide to keep him I would expect that Peterborough would keep the two forwards they think will contribute the most.
I fully expect one of Easton Rye or Masen Johnston to be the backup to either Zach Bowen or Liam Sztuska. If the Petes keep Sztuska I expect Bowen will be traded.If Bowen can’t carry the load he won’t be here then. Might as well give the backup spot to Rye or Johnston