Whitesnake
If you rebuild, they will come.
- Jan 5, 2003
- 91,411
- 41,077
At this point, the East will be so competitive that the team that will get out from the East might have no juice left against the Western team that they will face...
Boston will probably sweep everything on its way...At this point, the East will be so competitive that the team that will get out from the East might have no juice left against the Western team that they will face...
I felt like i didn't need to add the emoji given how obviously obvious it was...
True I don't like them much but I do prefer them to Boston who look poised to conquer the East.Its easy to root against the rangers given the distinct advantages they have as an organization.
Thankfully, as their entire existence indicates, they almost always deliver a failure.
My brain has been fried twice, thanksConnor McDavid has 47 (29 games -- 1.62ppg) of his 118 points against playoffs teams and 71 (33 games -- 2.15 ppg) against non playoffs teams and 45 points against bottom 10 teams. This should tell us what kind of player he is and it’s not one we should have in Montreal.
Too bad we can't sneak into the playoffs to beat them once again.Can’t wait for the presidents trophy jinx
And MB apparently really wanted Pasta.. ok then, he couldn't have made a trade with boston 1 spot?? Nahh we'll take Scherbak.Was hoping against all hope Boston was going to come up short with the $$ to sign Pastrnak...
So damn jealous of them
I just hope Boston chokes!!!At this point, the East will be so competitive that the team that will get out from the East might have no juice left against the Western team that they will face...
FWIW - Moving even 1-spot up after 20OA typically costs 1-2 2nd round picks - Habs didn’t have any in 2014And MB apparently really wanted Pasta.. ok then, he couldn't have made a trade with boston 1 spot?? Nahh we'll take Scherbak.
Yeah I could see how much of a waste of ice he was last night against the playoffs bound Leafs...Connor McDavid has 47 (29 games -- 1.62ppg) of his 118 points against playoffs teams and 71 (33 games -- 2.15 ppg) against non playoffs teams and 45 points against bottom 10 teams. This should tell us what kind of player he is and it’s not one we should have in Montreal.
True I don't like them much but I do prefer them to Boston who look poised to conquer the East.
Hamilton was a 9th oaI get it.
But I also respect the way Boston has built it. They did it without tanking.
Right, they did it with competence!I get it.
But I also respect the way Boston has built it. They did it without tanking.
Boston has been the class of the league for the past 15 years. Moreso than Tampa Bay.Right, they did it with competence!
I remember when we drafted Mailloux, posters were asking "why didn't they just take a similar prospect with that pick?" As if they're all interchangeable and you just develop scherbak into pastrnakAnd MB apparently really wanted Pasta.. ok then, he couldn't have made a trade with boston 1 spot?? Nahh we'll take Scherbak.
They're the masters of the 2 year reset. Been doing it like that since forever.Hamilton was a 9th oa
Seguin was a 2nd oa
Phil Kessel 5th oa
Joe Thornton 1st oa, Samsononv 8th oa
two other top 10 in the two years before Big Joe (one busted hard)
Boston do 2 years-ish at the bottom every 7 years or so. They sell some vets for picks, draft well post 1st round, signs some UFAs and right back into the playoffs afterwards. Rinse and Repeat since forever (I stopped checking after the 80s).
They were fortunate this year to have Bergeron deciding to not retire, and Krejcy coming back from his country for another kick at the can. Without these two, a totally diffrent story.They're the masters of the 2 year reset. Been doing it like that since forever.
This is a very good point… assuming Scherbs and Pasta had similar draft prospect profiles. Otherwise different teams might prefer or heavily bias toward certain qualities or essential traits.Boston has been the class of the league for the past 15 years. Moreso than Tampa Bay.
I remember when we drafted Mailloux, posters were asking "why didn't they just take a similar prospect with that pick?" As if they're all interchangeable and you just develop scherbak into pastrnak
They didn't tank for Seguin and Hamilton. They got those picks from the Leafs for Kessel compliments of Brian Burke. They both got traded for questionable returns. Joe Thornton was drafted last millennium.Hamilton was a 9th oa
Seguin was a 2nd oa
Phil Kessel 5th oa
Joe Thornton 1st oa, Samsononv 8th oa
two other top 10 in the two years before Big Joe (one busted hard)
Boston do 2 years-ish at the bottom every 7 years or so. They sell some vets for picks, draft well post 1st round, signs some UFAs and right back into the playoffs afterwards. Rinse and Repeat since forever (I stopped checking after the 80s).
Sounds about right as to what our development program was like before hugo.Boston has been the class of the league for the past 15 years. Moreso than Tampa Bay.
I remember when we drafted Mailloux, posters were asking "why didn't they just take a similar prospect with that pick?" As if they're all interchangeable and you just develop scherbak into pastrnak
I am sorry for you because you're gonna regret this one for a long long timePierre-Luc Dubois has 19 (28 games) his 55 points against playoffs teams and 36 (32 games) against non playoffs teams and 24 points against bottom 10 teams. This should tell us what kind of player he is and it’s not one we should have in Montreal.
i still remember in the 70's before the cap how NY and Stars were both signing the best free agents on the market years after year. Each time, i remind telling my friends that they were unbeatable , but each season they found ways to looseIts easy to root against the rangers given the distinct advantages they have as an organization.
Thankfully, as their entire existence indicates, they almost always deliver a failure.