Yeah my point is what happens if they get first or second overall and sit the kid to start the year and play him bottom 6 minutes.
I mean look at how DC treated Ekberg. Amidovski wasn’t exactly handled the best either
I don’t feel that is the complete picture. I try to keep it real. I may not feel that DC is the ideal option for the 67’s and I would like to see him replaced; however, I will come to his defence when I feel it is warranted.
The Head Coach’s primary job is to win games. So, they set a lineup that suits winning games. Other than his love affair with Korbler, I believe he mostly did that. Rookie opportunities (as well as younger players that lack experience) get “responsible” ice time. They get placed in protected situations until they prove they can handle more of a workload. You cannot just will a kid into confidence and performance.
Amidovski started very slow. HE didn’t do anything to help his own case. He struggled on the 4th line. He struggled on the 3rd line. The type of game he plays wasn’t translating at his maturity level. Should have have suited up for the home opener? Absolutely. But, I don’t have any issues with how he was deployed in the first half. The second half he had a fair amount of injury issues that really hurt his opportunities. The second half is wher ethe 16 year olds tend to start to gather steam but he didn’t play much.
For Ekberg, it was sort of the same thing. HE was contributing on the power play with extra time and space but he wasn’t consistently able to generate offence at even strength. Personally, I would have played him more consistently higher in the lineup but I can see why DC didn’t. My main issue was that he didnt get a chance at centre. I think his skill set translates well at centre ice.
The reality is, it is Boyd’s responsibility to clear the deck for the young guys. Pinelli and Foster should have been gone at the deadline. No question about it. Clearing that deck was imperative to opening up space for young guys. But, he didn’t. You cannot play Pinelli 16 minutes per game in favour of rookies. You have ot play him 24 minutes. You have no choice. That first line is going to get run out there at a minimum of every third shift. You can shelter the young guys in the fist half but you then need to push them in the 2nd half and doing that required Boyd to clear the deck at the deadline.
In fact, Boyd has a horrible habit of hoarding players. They need to settle on a roster sooner. I understand injuries come into play but dressing 11 ‘08s is silly. How can you do anything with so many guys vying for the same minutes? Crazy.
So, this isn’t a DC issue IMO. This is a GM issue. Sure, the coach can dictate who plays and how often but when the Head Coach and GM put their brain boxes together and decide this team actually had a chance to do something special this year, that is a sign of just how disconnected they both are. Of course DC Is going to play to win. He is gong to ride his veteran players to death. Look at the goalie splits in the 2nd half. MacKenzie played 20 games to Nelson’s 13. They were trying to win at all costs. No coach is going to focus on developing young guys when the GM decides to keep Pinelli and Foster. That is just azz-backwards.
OSEG needs to make a major change IMO. The evidence of mistakes, poor judgement, poor self realization, leading to a lack of positive direction has really put this team in an awful situation. But, if we look at it from an individual player perspective, one that is drafted top 4, I don’t see the current Ottawa situation being a net negative for that player at all. Could it be better with a GM/Coach change? YEs. Could it end up being worse. Absolutely. Depends on who they hire! For example, who is to say that Egert taking the reins as GM and Milley manning the bench changes anything? Both worked under the guys that got canned. Will they be any different?