beastintheeast
Registered User
- Mar 27, 2013
- 3,807
- 823
You actually are making my point. We have 12 players right now that are playing. There is no one in the stands if someone gets hurt or tired.Beast, I don’t understand the not enough players if we make trades comment.
We have 12 rostered forwards now that Uronen is out for the year. Sirman is back in less than a month and Yanni is signed to an affiliate card. That gives us 14 players. If we trade Stonehouse, we still have 13 forwards.
We have eight rostered D-Men (assuming Sirman returns as a forward). We have Dietsch signed to an affiliate card and he did look good when he played his games. Clearly the depth of defence is why he isn‘t on the roster yet.
I see no reason to believe this team cannot make trades at every position if they choose to. We traded away Ethan Quick last year for a 7th round pick at the deadline. if we need a depth forward, we can trade a mid-round pick in that 7-9 range for a warm body If they don’t feel Yanni is capable.
Ideally, we only trade Stonehouse and Donoso if we are “selling.” If we feel we can move a player like Smyth at a decent return because we have enough depth at defence, then so be it. I think he’d be worth more keeping him than trading him though. Whatever we can get for him now, we can likely come close to getting next year at the beginning of the season. May as well keep him unless we can score a 3rd round pick or better.
We have 8 players that sort of play defence lol again no spare in case of injury
Yanni , Dietsch and Nelson should be left where they are unless they are going to get a good amount of ice time.
I would actually be ok with trading a late draft pick for a backup goalie for this year.
Funny you are talking about Donoso and Kingston Frontsfan and I are talking about the same thing.It really depends on where teams sit closer to the deadline. Even teams like Sudbury with no open OA spots can shuffle OA’s if they feel an OA goalie is their best shot at solidifying their net. I feel DiVin is the best candidate for them but just sayin’.
A team like NB, if they trade DiVin, may want a guy like Donoso. If they were to go into seller mode and part with a couple of their good OA’s, they may want to shore up their net.
Flint is another team giving up too many goals. If they feel Day has lost confidence, they could look in that direction as a moderately cheap alternative. They can also move a good OA forward and probably end up with more picks than it takes to acquire Donoso.
Kingston has an OA spot available. Their back end could use better goaltending. I do like Vaccari but he is kinda small and if they decide to make a bit of a push to get more playoff games in to prepare for next year, they may want better goaltending.
Brantford has an OA spot open. If they have lost faith in Dorval, he is also an OA that could be replaced.
I think there are options out there. It is more a matter of waiting on teams to make a decision on what their goals are this year.
I don’t think it would happen but if the 67’s feel next year isn’t their year, is there any possibility they keep Donoso and flip MacK out? Far fetched, I know. BUT, what would his value be at the deadline? Imagine him sliding into Sudbury? Talk about an overnight turnaround in net for them.
The problem then is whether can you platoon Vaccari and Donoso
The question for a lot of teams is going to be price, does Donoso want to go there and what is their future plan.
MacK has to stay here there is just not enough depth for them at the defence that they can afford to go with a weak goalie next year.
Nelson is going to need a year to get ready for the OHL the last thing you would want to do is put him in the position that he is going to be the number 1 goalie and have no experience.