Ottawa 67's 2023-24 Season Thread (Part One)

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Beast, I don’t understand the not enough players if we make trades comment.

We have 12 rostered forwards now that Uronen is out for the year. Sirman is back in less than a month and Yanni is signed to an affiliate card. That gives us 14 players. If we trade Stonehouse, we still have 13 forwards.

We have eight rostered D-Men (assuming Sirman returns as a forward). We have Dietsch signed to an affiliate card and he did look good when he played his games. Clearly the depth of defence is why he isn‘t on the roster yet.


I see no reason to believe this team cannot make trades at every position if they choose to. We traded away Ethan Quick last year for a 7th round pick at the deadline. if we need a depth forward, we can trade a mid-round pick in that 7-9 range for a warm body If they don’t feel Yanni is capable.

Ideally, we only trade Stonehouse and Donoso if we are “selling.” If we feel we can move a player like Smyth at a decent return because we have enough depth at defence, then so be it. I think he’d be worth more keeping him than trading him though. Whatever we can get for him now, we can likely come close to getting next year at the beginning of the season. May as well keep him unless we can score a 3rd round pick or better.
You actually are making my point. We have 12 players right now that are playing. There is no one in the stands if someone gets hurt or tired.

We have 8 players that sort of play defence lol again no spare in case of injury

Yanni , Dietsch and Nelson should be left where they are unless they are going to get a good amount of ice time.

I would actually be ok with trading a late draft pick for a backup goalie for this year.
It really depends on where teams sit closer to the deadline. Even teams like Sudbury with no open OA spots can shuffle OA’s if they feel an OA goalie is their best shot at solidifying their net. I feel DiVin is the best candidate for them but just sayin’.

A team like NB, if they trade DiVin, may want a guy like Donoso. If they were to go into seller mode and part with a couple of their good OA’s, they may want to shore up their net.

Flint is another team giving up too many goals. If they feel Day has lost confidence, they could look in that direction as a moderately cheap alternative. They can also move a good OA forward and probably end up with more picks than it takes to acquire Donoso.

Kingston has an OA spot available. Their back end could use better goaltending. I do like Vaccari but he is kinda small and if they decide to make a bit of a push to get more playoff games in to prepare for next year, they may want better goaltending.

Brantford has an OA spot open. If they have lost faith in Dorval, he is also an OA that could be replaced.

I think there are options out there. It is more a matter of waiting on teams to make a decision on what their goals are this year.

I don’t think it would happen but if the 67’s feel next year isn’t their year, is there any possibility they keep Donoso and flip MacK out? Far fetched, I know. BUT, what would his value be at the deadline? Imagine him sliding into Sudbury? Talk about an overnight turnaround in net for them.
Funny you are talking about Donoso and Kingston Frontsfan and I are talking about the same thing.

The problem then is whether can you platoon Vaccari and Donoso

The question for a lot of teams is going to be price, does Donoso want to go there and what is their future plan.

MacK has to stay here there is just not enough depth for them at the defence that they can afford to go with a weak goalie next year.

Nelson is going to need a year to get ready for the OHL the last thing you would want to do is put him in the position that he is going to be the number 1 goalie and have no experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: frontsfan67
Looking at the Scorers sheet. Lawrence is back but Marrelli is out.
 
Gotta love Barlas on the wing. So much more engaged and effective. His tenacity is more appreciated coming from the boards.
 
I’m starting to see a lot of Brendan Bell in Henry Mews. All the tools with no toolbox. Just a lot of dumb, low chance shots that turn the puck over.

Barlas was great today. I think he plays really well off the wing.

The team needs the centre added ASAP. Foster was ok down the middle but he is so much more dynamic off the wing.

Nice to see Lawrence back but he was rusty and sluggish.

We need a win tomorrow against North Bay. They should be tired tomorrow with a 3 in 3. Thy play in Peterborough tonight.
 
Gotta love Barlas on the wing. So much more engaged and effective. His tenacity is more appreciated coming from the boards.
Beat me to the punch, totally agree he was one of our players today and his future is on the wing. I kind of disagree with you on Foster though, I think he is a legit option at center unless we acquire one. That being said I think we should play him there to prepars for next year. That Barlas/Fosted/Gerrior line was by far our best line today.
 
I’m starting to see a lot of Brendan Bell in Henry Mews. All the tools with no toolbox. Just a lot of dumb, low chance shots that turn the puck over.

Barlas was great today. I think he plays really well off the wing.

The team needs the centre added ASAP. Foster was ok down the middle but he is so much more dynamic off the wing.

Nice to see Lawrence back but he was rusty and sluggish.

We need a win tomorrow against North Bay. They should be tired tomorrow with a 3 in 3. Thy play in Peterborough tonight.
Mews actually played a very good game today imo. Was more agressive to push the play offensively and engaged! But in overtime he layed an egg. I think he was on the ice the last two minutes of that 3 on 3. Kepth telling my buddy...get off the f...ice. Ah well.

Last word on Pinelli. Hate to critisize the kid as he's a stud and a hell of a competitor. However imo he's trying to be too cute with the puck recently. Stop dangling Luca and make the simple play.
 
Mews actually played a very good game today imo. Was more agressive to push the play offensively and engaged! But in overtime he layed an egg. I think he was on the ice the last two minutes of that 3 on 3. Kepth telling my buddy...get off the f...ice. Ah well.

Last word on Pinelli. Hate to critisize the kid as he's a stud and a hell of a competitor. However imo he's trying to be too cute with the puck recently. Stop dangling Luca and make the simple play.

For Mews, it isn’t about his play between our goal line and the offensive blueline. It is ONLLY his decision making with the puck int he offensive zone. For the next few games, pay attention to what he does with the puck. Notice how often he shoots the puck into bad lanes and how often he makes poor decisions on feeds down low.

He has 42 shots on goal and about 400 shots toward goal. The number of times his shots lead to a turnover is astounding. Then watch Marrelli. See how often he shoots on net, how many get through and how many are productive.

This is something Mews needs to work on.

Foster is likely our best option at centre but his value on the wing with Gardiner on the front line is invaluable. Dever in his spot is much less productive. If the plan is to convert him to centre for next year and we are giving up on this season, I am fine with that. But, that should also mean Stonehouse is out the door with one or two of the D-Men.

I agree about Pinelli but all of those types of guys go through those phases and then they learn. This is just him going through that phase. Cameron won’t let it get out of hand.
 
At the game today, had the chance to wish Killer and Mrs. Killer a Merry Christmas. We haven't seen Judy for a few years and they both looked great.

I agree that, for the most part, Mews played well today, except for a couple of brain farts. If there is one thing that he is weak on it is the decisions he makes when pressed, and the opposition knows it. Same for far too many 67s. Ewles was pushing the puck up ice and had two forwards available and flying at the Flint blue line. Instead, he carried the puck a bit more and everyone was offside. Overall, this team makes very poor decisions all over the ice. Clearing passes through their own crease, half-hearted passes that get cut off, taking late penalties when goaded, bad shooting choices.

Is Cameron's system a bit too complex for players of this age? The whole "rag the puck behind the net while everybody changes" (1st and 3rd period only) seems to be ineffective. It also seems to gut the stretch pass idea.

Barlas played as well as he ever has. Lawrence was competing hard. Marrelli would have helped the result today.
 
I think once Mews is drafted we will see a great change in him as the NHL coaches will guide him more.

Right now i think he probably is trying too hard to get noticed of offense and the idea of shooting if it is on the net is always a good thing.

I would hate to see him go the other way and pass all the time.
 
For Mews, it isn’t about his play between our goal line and the offensive blueline. It is ONLLY his decision making with the puck int he offensive zone. For the next few games, pay attention to what he does with the puck. Notice how often he shoots the puck into bad lanes and how often he makes poor decisions on feeds down low.

He has 42 shots on goal and about 400 shots toward goal. The number of times his shots lead to a turnover is astounding. Then watch Marrelli. See how often he shoots on net, how many get through and how many are productive.

This is something Mews needs to work on.

Foster is likely our best option at centre but his value on the wing with Gardiner on the front line is invaluable. Dever in his spot is much less productive. If the plan is to convert him to centre for next year and we are giving up on this season, I am fine with that. But, that should also mean Stonehouse is out the door with one or two of the D-Men.

I agree about Pinelli but all of those types of guys go through those phases and then they learn. This is just him going through that phase. Cameron won’t let it get out of hand.
OMG I do agree about his decisions in the O zone particularly on the pp but I guess I forget he's 17 as as you know I have been a bit critical of him lately. What I liked about the game yesterday is how he carried the puck and supported the offense at five on five. I've been waiting for him to play more dynamically, he's certainly got the tools to do it. In the O zone he needs to learn to use hes skating to move laterally " walk the line" to open up lanes. It will come the kid is too talented. That being said I would use Marelli on the first pp for a while as I feel his game is a bit more mature.
 
For Mews, it isn’t about his play between our goal line and the offensive blueline. It is ONLLY his decision making with the puck int he offensive zone. For the next few games, pay attention to what he does with the puck. Notice how often he shoots the puck into bad lanes and how often he makes poor decisions on feeds down low.

He has 42 shots on goal and about 400 shots toward goal. The number of times his shots lead to a turnover is astounding. Then watch Marrelli. See how often he shoots on net, how many get through and how many are productive.

This is something Mews needs to work on.

Foster is likely our best option at centre but his value on the wing with Gardiner on the front line is invaluable. Dever in his spot is much less productive. If the plan is to convert him to centre for next year and we are giving up on this season, I am fine with that. But, that should also mean Stonehouse is out the door with one or two of the D-Men.

I agree about Pinelli but all of those types of guys go through those phases and then they learn. This is just him going through that phase. Cameron won’t let it get out of hand.
Speaking of Cameron. Great coach but am a bit puzzled by a few choices recently. One using Smyth on the second pp?? Ok Marelli wasn't there but really. If you're gonna do that use Mayich or even Ewles. Heck go with five forwatd my buddy Gerrior can play the point responsibly. The second is his choice on the 3 on 3. He started with Gardiner, Pinelli and Mews no issue with that. Then with a face off in our zone he went with Smyth, Lawrence and Foster. He also did it again later in OT. Now I get he felt Lawrence could win the face off but man only one guy on the ice can really skate! Sorry but you've got to get better skaters out there..Stoney , Gerrior, Dever Ewles. Not like we don't have them.
 
Speaking of Cameron. Great coach but am a bit puzzled by a few choices recently. One using Smyth on the second pp?? Ok Marelli wasn't there but really. If you're gonna do that use Mayich or even Ewles. Heck go with five forwatd my buddy Gerrior can play the point responsibly. The second is his choice on the 3 on 3. He started with Gardiner, Pinelli and Mews no issue with that. Then with a face off in our zone he went with Smyth, Lawrence and Foster. He also did it again later in OT. Now I get he felt Lawrence could win the face off but man only one guy on the ice can really skate! Sorry but you've got to get better skaters out there..Stoney , Gerrior, Dever Ewles. Not like we don't have them.
YOu might consider that at this stage part of the plan my be to showcase the ability of players for trade purposes.

Putting lawrence and Foster allows him to have 2 face-off people on the ice in case one gets waved.

Let's remember that this coach and GM have done some amazing things with this team in he past 2 years.

Seems kind of interesting that we have one of the best coaches who have a team that has limited scoring and is still one of the powers in the East and you are second-guessing him.

Got to wonder what makes people happy. As to Mews give him a break this is a kid with a lot of pressure on him this year
 
  • Like
Reactions: OMG67
OMG I do agree about his decisions in the O zone particularly on the pp but I guess I forget he's 17 as as you know I have been a bit critical of him lately. What I liked about the game yesterday is how he carried the puck and supported the offense at five on five. I've been waiting for him to play more dynamically, he's certainly got the tools to do it. In the O zone he needs to learn to use hes skating to move laterally " walk the line" to open up lanes. It will come the kid is too talented. That being said I would use Marelli on the first pp for a while as I feel his game is a bit more mature.

He’s 17 which is why I have mostly ignored it but we are at a point now where it is far too noticeable to ignore. I am more positive that he will make the necessary changes but this highlights the need to acquire a true top pairing D-Man if they decide to make a bit of a run. The concept of a top 4 is not enough. Mews is still too immature as a player to be counted on as a top pairing D-Man. This is the only reason why I am highlighting it. It isn’t to slag the kid because, in all fairness, he is still a kid and learning.

Speaking of Cameron. Great coach but am a bit puzzled by a few choices recently. One using Smyth on the second pp?? Ok Marelli wasn't there but really. If you're gonna do that use Mayich or even Ewles. Heck go with five forwatd my buddy Gerrior can play the point responsibly. The second is his choice on the 3 on 3. He started with Gardiner, Pinelli and Mews no issue with that. Then with a face off in our zone he went with Smyth, Lawrence and Foster. He also did it again later in OT. Now I get he felt Lawrence could win the face off but man only one guy on the ice can really skate! Sorry but you've got to get better skaters out there..Stoney , Gerrior, Dever Ewles. Not like we don't have them.

I was screaming for Whitehead over Lawrence 3 on 3. And I was also confused like crazy about Smyth on the 3 on 3. It looks more lik ehe is showcasing guys outside their normal responsibility zones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sirius67fan
YOu might consider that at this stage part of the plan my be to showcase the ability of players for trade purposes.

Putting lawrence and Foster allows him to have 2 face-off people on the ice in case one gets waved.

Let's remember that this coach and GM have done some amazing things with this team in he past 2 years.

Seems kind of interesting that we have one of the best coaches who have a team that has limited scoring and is still one of the powers in the East and you are second-guessing him.

Got to wonder what makes people happy. As to Mews give him a break this is a kid with a lot of pressure on him this year
I stand chastized...lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: OMG67
YOu might consider that at this stage part of the plan my be to showcase the ability of players for trade purposes.

Putting lawrence and Foster allows him to have 2 face-off people on the ice in case one gets waved.

Let's remember that this coach and GM have done some amazing things with this team in he past 2 years.

Seems kind of interesting that we have one of the best coaches who have a team that has limited scoring and is still one of the powers in the East and you are second-guessing him.

Got to wonder what makes people happy. As to Mews give him a break this is a kid with a lot of pressure on him this year

I am also getting that “showcase” vibe as well, Beast. I am seeing some players playing in situations that are outside their normal responsibilities. Seeing Smyth out there replacing Marrelli in the more offensive opportunities was odd. You’d think Ewles would be the next guy up in those situations. Even Brady has shown some promise in that area.
 
Dietsch is playing today. I saw Horner take a pretty good hit along the boards yesterday. Looked like he may have popped the shoulder a bit. He’s out today. Mack starting. No other changes in the lineup from yesterday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section5Petes
67's win 6-5

SHOTS ON GOAL
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TH]Teams[/TH]
[TH]1st[/TH]
[TH]2nd[/TH]
[TH]3rd[/TH]
[TH]Total[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]NB[/TH]
[TD]11[/TD]
[TD]14[/TD]
[TD]11[/TD]
[TD]36[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]OTT[/TH]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]12[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]42[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


STARS OF THE GAME​

Stonehouse

FIRST
#17 Brady Stonehouse RW
G 2A 1+/- +1Ottawa


Pinelli

THIRD
#20 Luca Pinelli C
G 2A 0+/- +1Ottawa
 
Last edited:
Can anyone not agree that It’s coming to the point where it’s how don’t you go for it? 2nd in the East & 4th overall. we will call it a month from the deadline I guess the last 12 games before the deadline will really tell the tape but this could quite possibly be a go for it season
 
Can anyone not agree that It’s coming to the point where it’s how don’t you go for it? 2nd in the East & 4th overall. we will call it a month from the deadline I guess the last 12 games before the deadline will really tell the tape but this could quite possibly be a go for it season

The problem is the eye test. A lot of one goal games which is great but as team go into the second half and bulk up, can Ottawa sustain their current pace and push forward?

I guess it comes down to how much will it cost to ideally position ourselves to compete and are we willing to make those sorts of moves?

We need a similar two guys as we acquired last year if we honestly want to compete. We’d likely need at least an additional big winger that can score.

Pinelli - Gardiner - Foster
Stonehouse - Dubois(Trade OA) - Gerrior
Barlas - Lawrence - TRADE
Sirman - Whitehead - Dever
Korbler-Hilton
(Trade - Kelly)

Mayich - Mews
Marrelli - Mayer(Trade OA)
Smyth - Brady
Horner
(Trade - Ewles or Brady)

MacK
TRADE
(Trade - Donoso)

I’m not sure that is a Championship roster. Maybe strong enough to get out of the Conference but only because the conference is weak. I’d like to improve the 3rd pairing defence as well. Put someone beside Smyth that just kills people around the net. Someone like Leskovar.
 
Hey 67's fans, going to make the trip up when Saginaw is there next month. I've been to the arena once previously. Just wanted to ask if anyone had any comments/thoughts on the "ICE" seating that is being offered - can't find any pictures/info on it. Is it worth the small upcharge for those seats? It says section 4.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad